Mattforclark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-13-04 01:22 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Who would you vote for? |
|
Edited on Fri Feb-13-04 01:30 PM by Mattforclark
Given this choice?
And if you can't be bothered to vote in real life, you can't be bothered to vote in this poll.
|
liberal72
(405 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-13-04 01:28 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Is the person who just voted for Bush/Cheney a Freeper?
|
krkaufman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-13-04 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
6. Naw, just people not happy with a Kerry/Clark ticket... |
|
... and are trying to skew the results.
|
name not needed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-13-04 01:28 PM
Response to Original message |
BidMarx
(23 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-13-04 01:29 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Tainted poll: 3RD Party w/ Weak State not Included. |
|
Abstaining isn't, nor is writing people in.
|
Mattforclark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-13-04 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
"3RD Party w/ Weak State not Included"
Yes it is.
"Abstaining isn't"
Yes it is. --- "And if you can't be bothered to vote in real life, you can't be bothered to vote in this poll." ---
"nor is writing people in."
It is now.
|
krkaufman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-13-04 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. Those choices are included.... |
|
... under the choice "I am delusional."
|
krkaufman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-13-04 01:43 PM
Response to Original message |
5. "Solid state" 3rd party vote not a reasonable argument |
|
Knowing that the Republicans, in the 2000 election, were prepared to legally challenge a Gore electoral win over a Bush popular vote advantage, voting 3rd party or not voting at all is less harmless than you let on.
EVERY VOTE cast needs to be cast to throw these oil-loving, empire-building, penis-envying schmucks out of office -- regardless of the state in which you live and whether or not the anti-Bush candidate looks to win.
(Above argument is void, of course, if you're not ABB.)
|
NewYorkerfromMass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-13-04 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. Yes. I told people that in 2000 knowing it would be close |
|
Even though Gore would win NY, NJ, and Connecticut handily I implored everyone that the popular vote/electoral college schism might come to bear and sure enough.....
|
beyurslf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-13-04 01:46 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Abb. Why are there 4 votes for Bush on this? |
progressiverealist
(460 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-13-04 01:54 PM
Response to Original message |
10. so 10% of DUers will VOTE FOR BUSH??? |
|
I don't care if this gets me banned. YOU SUCK!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:39 PM
Response to Original message |