Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama campaign to emphasize electability

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 06:42 PM
Original message
Obama campaign to emphasize electability
Edited on Wed May-23-07 06:45 PM by jefferson_dem
From http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2007/05/clinton_and_obama_iowa_memos.html?nav=rss_blog

In a feat of fortuitous timing, Sen. Barack Obama's (Ill.) campaign is moving a memo of its own around Iowa that makes the electability argument -- citing two recent independent polls.

"With over seven months until Caucus day, the polls will fluctuate," writes Obama Iowa communications director Josh Earnest. "While our campaign's focus will be continuing to build on our strong grassroots organization, the early polls indicate that Barack is emerging as the most 'electable' candidate in the eyes of Iowa Democrats."

<SNIP>

But, the fact that Obama's campaign has begun to paint him as the candidate best able to reach across the aisle is telling. Obama is well aware of the whispers among Democratic activists that Clinton is simply too divisive to win the White House and that Edwards' strong liberal stances (immediate withdrawal from Iraq, a healthcare plan that could result in a tax increase for wealthy Americans) could hobble him if he becomes the Democratic nominee.

By injecting the electability argument into the Iowa caucuses, Obama is hoping to force likely caucus goers to think not just with their hearts but also with their heads. He's making sure the caucuses are thinking about electing a president not just about choosing a Democratic nominee.

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2007/05/clinton_and_obama_iowa_memos.html?nav=rss_blog

*****

NOTE: In addition to the polls cited in this piece, a new Zogby poll, scheduled to be released today, will also show that Obama is more electable than either Clinton or Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Todays' Poll: Clinton at 36% ... Obama at 26%
May 23 2007


Engagement in the 2008 Presidential Election


With just under 18 months until the 2008 presidential election, the vast majority of registered voters report being closely engaged in the campaign. The overwhelming majority express “a lot” of interest (77%) in the campaign, with another 15% reporting at least “some” interest. In addition, four in ten (40%) report having watched or listened to at least one of the debates between the candidates. Of the three debates, the Democratic debate on April 26th was the most popular, with 53% reporting seeing the debate (compared to 38% for the Republican debate on May 3rd, and 39% for the Republican debate on May
15th).


2008 Primary Vote


Among likely Democratic primary voters (self-identified Democrats who say they typically vote in their party’s primary election), Hillary Clinton takes the top spot with a 10-point lead over closest rival, Barack Obama. Former Vice President Al Gore and John Edwards are in a statistical dead heat for third place.


Hillary up at 36%

Obama down at 26%

Edwards....at 10%

moe +/- 3.5%


http://www.diageohotlinepoll.com/07_May_Pressrelease.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah, i saw that. Nice bold type... but what's your point?
Edited on Wed May-23-07 06:59 PM by jefferson_dem
Another ten point advantage for Hillary for the nomination bears no relevance on whether she is ultimately electable in the General, which is the point of the OP. Do you have anything to add to that discussion?

EDIT: Have a look at the polls referenced in the story at link. Add to it to the fact that 47% of the public will "definitely vote against" Hillary in Rasmussen and the soon to be released Zogby poll that shows Hillary faring poorly against the Repukes as compared to Obama and Edwards... She may be on top for nomination (for now) but she is virtually unelectable in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. If you want to focus on the GE..
be my guest.

There will be only one winner in the Dem Primary and it will be Hillary!

Arguing about the GE now is a waste of time and bandwidth..imo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Brilliant insight. She will win the Nomination because she will win...And who cares about the WH.
Typical...ly lame and short-sighted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Republicans are polling @ 27% in the GE Dems are already @ 56%
I have no fear whatsoever of the country electing another Republican President...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I'll file this one in the "prediction" folder and hope you never have a chance to be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. If Polls meant a lot
She would not be considering skipping Iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. And where did you hear that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. See what I just posted on Mrs. Clinton & New Hampshire.
Thats our Girl!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Awww....an "inspirational woman" in NH. Now there's some credentials...
Your "Girl."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Theres more than just that, but I knew you wouldn't comment on the other.
Edited on Wed May-23-07 07:41 PM by William769
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. LOL!
By the way, Gobama!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemDem07 Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. That's bad news for Hill and Co.
15 years in the national spotlight, Senator of New York, A beloved ex-president of a husband, and her numbers are this low?

This really doesn't look good for Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. I heard a couple things today that may be why Obama is the most electable.
The rumors about clinton's temper came to light again when a reporter asked how she would vote tomorrow and clinton got snippy and snotty with her.
I heard Craig Crawford this morning point up why edwards is having problems. He said he is probably the most decent and honest guy who comes across as untrustworthy. That Edwards is a good person but, for some reason he is projecting the opposite and if he could find out why and correct it he would be a major force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Chaos and confusion are part of the game..
the weak are easily confused because they choose to let someone else do their thinking for them. Then they are sure to peddle the propaganda indoctrinating the masses. "If so many are saying it, it must be true". Then sadly, they discover, it was never true at all and slowly they devolve into chaos and can't believe anything anymore. It seems you've taken the bait...and arrived.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
13. I guess nothin else is workin for him...
Try a new strategy....hard to make an electibility argument when you can point to exactly one state that you are consistently ahead in the polls though...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC