Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cheney attorney asked for data to be destroyed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 04:11 AM
Original message
Cheney attorney asked for data to be destroyed



Lawyer told Secret Service to erase visitor log at vice president's residence
WASHINGTON - A lawyer for Vice President Dick Cheney told the Secret Service in September to eliminate data on who visited Cheney at his official residence, a newly disclosed letter states.

The Sept. 13, 2006, letter from Cheney's lawyer says logs for Cheney's residence on the grounds of the Naval Observatory are subject to the Presidential Records Act.

Such a designation prevents the public from learning who visited the vice president.
The Justice Department filed the letter Friday in a lawsuit by a private group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, seeking the identities of conservative religious leaders who visited Cheney at his official residence.

The newly disclosed letter about visitors to Cheney's residence is accompanied by an 18-page Secret Service document revealing the agency's long-standing practice has been to destroy printed daily access lists of visitors to the residence.

Separately, the agency says it has given Cheney's office handwritten logs of who visits him at his personal residence.

Because of pending lawsuits, the Secret Service says it is now keeping copies of all material on visitors to Cheney's residence. According to the Secret Service document, Cheney's office has approved the agency's retention of the records, while maintaining they are presidential records subject to Cheney's control.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18927300/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 05:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Uh, Lord Vader is not the president?
Does the Presidential Records Act apply to the VP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 05:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Josh Marshall wrote several months ago that Cheney's gang
is trying to claim that they are a unique position - that the veep is not exec branch but part exec branch and part congressional branch (as head tie breaker vote in the senate) and thus outside some of the restrictions on the exec branch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Sounds like the unitary executive crap. Gonzo must be writing Cheney's jokes too.
The VP has only two Constitutional functions: first in line for the presidency and President of the Senate, where (s)he votes only to break a tie.

Lord Vader is outside executive branch restrictions in the same way as you and I. We have no authority there unless it is given by the president. IMO If we are given a role to play there we encounter restrictions just as those imposed on the Secretary of State, for example.

This week I've been again sharing that OP you did awhile back on employer provided healthcare. It is standing up to the test of time quite nicely.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=364&topic_id=210673
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. when they changed the rules by executive order they re-wrote it for VPs too
In 2001 it was more about Poppy Bush' I think but sure it was in prep for Cheney. They re-write lots of stuff with the intent to make him more of a peer of the president. Gee I wonder who wants that? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Who's he trying to hide? The D.C. Madam???? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC