Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary: Does she support Unions?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 11:42 AM
Original message
Hillary: Does she support Unions?
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/05/31/1412212

A new expose in The Nation magazine finds that while Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton is publicly trying to win support of unions in her presidential campaign, behind the scenes she is being advised by a team of strategists closely affiliated with unionbusters, GOP operatives and conservative media. We speak with the reporter who broke the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. She is DLC enough said
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Since She Was A Huge Supporter...
of her husband's permanent 'free' trade with China legislation, I'm thinking that she's not exactly a friend of the workin' stiff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. political ones like matlin and carville
or other DLC whores.

oh. not those type of unions, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. Whoa!
I was listening to a story yesterday morning on NPR about Obama and how blue-collar and union people are big on him.

Which candidate do most support? Hillary. Interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Let's see how the VOTING comes down when the primaries start
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bellasgrams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Remember the saying don't believe everything you read
This is especially true in the 'Nation'. I stopped reading it after the hit piece on Wes Clark a few years ago. They have their favorites and they push them and nit pick others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. True, true ...
I supported Clark myself. And ... :party: WELCOME TO DU!! :party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. All media sources have some degree of bias. But, if something is true --
like a broken clock is correct twice a day -- then it's true.

It just goes to show how close the Republicans Hillary is. After watching it, I thought: Maybe the (R)'s know they don't have a chance in 2008 so they are going with their next best choice: a DINO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doggyboy Donating Member (586 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. If "what" is true?
That some of the people on Hillary's staff are connected to big business interests?

Yeah, that's real special. I'm sure the other campaigns are staffed by angels and bunny rabbits
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. "angels and bunny" - I'm not looking for either, but also do not expect
those associated with union busting and links to the GOP. Being a DLCer, Hillary may not see this as a problem; others may.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doggyboy Donating Member (586 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. then you are being naive
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Do you have links to other candidates, say Kucinich or Edwards, where
they are saying they support Unions but have as advisors union-busters?

I think you're more accepting of duplicity than I am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprobate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Oh, BULLSHIT! You'd prefer Free Republic? The Nation and The Progressive


are the only left leaning mags worth reading. Your bias is showing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. "Outsourcing will Continue" Hillary?
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/GC01Df03.html

Hillary Clinton made it apparent where she stood on outsourcing during her India visit, in an attempt perhaps to clear the Indian misgivings received during the Kerry campaign. "There is no way to legislate against reality. Outsourcing will continue," she told an audience of Indian big-wigs. She pointed out that there were 3 billion people who feel left behind and are trying to attack the modern world in the hope of turning the clock back on globalization. "It is not far-fetched to imagine ... if the Indian miracle would be the one of choice of those who feel left behind," said Hillary.

Not to mention she goes on to talk about the Anti-India sentiment here. No one is anti-India, Hillary. We're anti-corporate greed, which she seems to facilitate depending on the audience. How do we get worker protections, or is that even a possibility? Workers here are hurt by this practice, and it's only going to get worse before it gets better.

Hillary Clinton stands up for Tatas, outsourcing

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/538674.cms

Senators form 'Friends of India'

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/593175.cms
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. Get real. Hillary is DLC, and the DLC thinks of Unions as interference.
If they give her a nickel, they deserve the royal screw-gee they'll get from her in the end.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. The Unions seem to think so...
Who would know better whether Hillary supports the Unions or not...than the unions themselves...

Looks to me like they like her just fine...



2006 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Service Employees International Union 94 percent in 2006.

2005-2006 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers 75 percent in 2005-2006.

2005 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers 100 percent in 2005.

2005 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Service Employees International Union 100 percent in 2005.

2005 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the United Auto Workers 93 percent in 2005.

2005 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the AFL-CIO 93 percent in 2005.

2005 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the United Electrical Radio and Machine Workers 84 percent in 2005.

2005 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Worker 100 percent in 2005.

2005 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees 88 percent in 2005.

2005 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the American Federation of Government Employees 83 percent in 2005.

2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the AFL-CIO 100 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the American Postal Workers Union 100 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the United Auto Workers 110 percent in 2004.

2004 On the votes that the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers considered to be the most important in 2004, Senator Clinton voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.

2004 On the votes that the Service Employees International Union considered to be the most important in 2004, Senator Clinton voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.

2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Communications Workers of America 100 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the United Electrical Radio and Machine Workers 33 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Worker 100 percent in 2004.

2003-2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees 100 percent in 2003-2004.

2003-2004 On the votes that the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers considered to be the most important in 2003-2004, Senator Clinton voted their preferred position 79 percent of the time.

2003-2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Bakery, Confectionary, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers Int 62 percent in 2003-2004.

2003-2004 On the votes that the National Association for the Self-Employed considered to be the most important in 2003-2004, Senator Clinton voted their preferred position 0 percent of the time.

2003-2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the American Federation of Government Employees 100 percent in 2003-2004.

2003 On the votes that the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers considered to be the most important in 2003, Senator Clinton voted their preferred position 73 percent of the time.

2003 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Transportation Communications Union 100 percent in 2003.

2003 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the United Auto Workers 92 percent in 2003. Those who supported or provided other assistance in connection with a UAW organizing drive are given an extra 10% bonus.

2003 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the AFL-CIO 85 percent in 2003.

2003 On the votes that the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers considered to be the most important in 2003, Senator Clinton voted their preferred position 71 percent of the time.

2003 On the votes that the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Worker considered to be the most important in 2003, Senator Clinton voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.

2003 On the votes that the United Electrical Radio and Machine Workers considered to be the most important in 2003, Senator Clinton voted their preferred position 67 percent of the time.

2003 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees 100 percent in 2003.

2003 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Workplace Fairness 80 percent in 2003.

2003 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Service Employees International Union 100 percent in 2003.

2002 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Transportation Communications Union 100 percent in 2002.

2002 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the American Federation of Government Employees 100 percent in 2002.

2002 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees 100 percent in 2002.

2002 On the votes that the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers considered to be the most important in 2002, Senator Clinton voted their preferred position 50 percent of the time.

2002 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Communications Workers of America 86 percent in 2002.

2002 On the votes that the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Worker considered to be the most important in 2002, Senator Clinton voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.

2002 On the votes that the United Electrical Radio and Machine Workers considered to be the most important in 2002, Senator Clinton voted their preferred position 72 percent of the time.

2002 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the AFL-CIO 92 percent in 2002.

2002 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the United Auto Workers 102 percent in 2002.

2002 On the votes that the Service Employees International Union considered to be the most important in 2002, Senator Clinton voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.

2002 On the votes that the Pennsylvania State Nurses Association considered to be the most important in 2002, Senator Clinton voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.

2001-2002 On the votes that the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers considered to be the most important in 2001-2002, Senator Clinton voted their preferred position 92 percent of the time.

2001-2002 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the American Postal Workers Union 100 percent in 2001-2002.

2001 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees 100 percent in 2001.

2001 On the votes that the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers considered to be the most important in 2001, Senator Clinton voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.

2001 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Transportation Communications Union 100 percent in 2001.

2001 On the votes that the United Electrical Radio and Machine Workers considered to be the most important in 2001, Senator Clinton voted their preferred position 72 percent of the time.

2001 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the American Federation of Government Employees 100 percent in 2001.

2001 On the votes that the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Worker considered to be the most important in 2001, Senator Clinton voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.

2001 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the United Auto Workers 93 percent in 2001.

2001 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the United Food & Commercial Workers 100 percent in 2001.

2001 On the votes that the Service Employees International Union considered to be the most important in 2001, Senator Clinton voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.

2001 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the AFL-CIO 100 percent in 2001.


www.vote-smart.org

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. The unions' opinions don't count. Only crumudgeons with obvious axes to grind are believible!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. And Edwards was advised by anti-Catholics, and Obama attended a terrorist school.
Despite all that, the three candidates have similar ratings from unions, Obama hasn't blown up any buildings, and Edwards has not canceled Mardi Gras.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. You're behind the times. Obama didn't attend a madrasa. This was
debunked by CNN of all people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. That was my point. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemDem07 Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. Not likely, no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ToeBot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
17. Support Unions? Sure she does, if that's who she happens to be talking to. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
19. guilt by association?
I would think her actual voting record might be of more value in determining her support for unions, rather than articles from organizations like the ""Nation or "Democracy Now", organizations that, apparently, can't be trusted to even do their homework...



Quite frankly, this is the sort of "journalism" I expect from the right wing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StudentsMustUniteNow Donating Member (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
22. DLC, NAFTA, Tata Consulting
Enough said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Psssssst Hillary had no bearing on NAFTA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. And opposed CAFTA...and her involvement with TATA...
Had to do with convincing them to keep offices in New York State, where btw, she is a U.S. Senator!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandrakae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
24. Ask James Carville.
Edited on Thu May-31-07 04:44 PM by sandrakae
Hilary doesn't have an opinion unless James Carville gives it to her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
27. off topic, but i read this as :Hillary: Does she support Unicorns?"
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC