Anyone see Drudges poll on who won the debate: SHOCKING numbers so far

[bigdarryl]

Very interesting not scientific and in fact more than likely most of the correspondences are not democrats. http://www.drudgereport.com/
DRUDGE REPORT 2007®

[Connie_Corleone]

1. Maybe you should post results or something.

[A-Schwarzenegger]

2. I'm shocked.

[DemDem07]

13. I'm not shocked

Hillary is just a few blips from an unknown entity like Gravel.

Former 1st lady can't buy a love.

[A-Schwarzenegger]

14. Shocked, I tell you.

And I didnt even have to go there. Do you know who/what Drudge is?

[DemDem07]

15. Yes of course I know who Drudge is.

[A-Schwarzenegger]

16. And you take him or his poll seriously?

I got a bridge for you.

[DemDem07]

21. As serious as I take any personal online poll

I got a losing candidate named Clinton for you.

[A-Schwarzenegger]

24. Who's your candidate?

[DemDem07]

25. ANNC

[A-Schwarzenegger]

27. Ann Coulter?!

[JustJoe]

32. Who is ANNC?

[Colobo]

3. What are the numbers?

[bigdarryl]

5. Just go to Drudge web page the numbers are to the right of the page

[flyarm]

10. won't go there he makes money when you go to his site..nope won't bite!! eom

[Auntie Bush]

19. I wouldn't give Drudge the credit. Why can't you copy and paste

the results? No wait...don't bother. I don't care what he and his audience have to say. They are all fools!

[The Count]

23. Are you on comission per # of hits? Are they THAT desperate now?

How pathetic is that!

[The Count]

4. If you want to give the hienna hits, you are in the wrong forum.

[NMDemDist2]

6. yup, pretty much

:rofl:

[wyldwolf]

7. I watched as hundreds of votes were shaved off of Clinton and Obama's totals

I voted in the poll. Clinton had 1,776 votes (I remembered it because it was like the year 1776). Obama was leading here in the poll by 3021 votes at the time.

When I switched computers, Clinton's numbers were 1,608 and Obama's numbers were only 2500 or so ahead of hers.

Suddenly, Richardson has jumped 2000 votes.

[bigdarryl]

8. And the point is?

[wyldwolf]

11. you honestly don't see the point there?

Geez. You post a Drudge poll then don't see how the numbers could be being manipulated a wee bit?

[DemDem07]

17. It's a conspiracy!

Drudge is working for Richardson! lol

[wyldwolf]

22. : )

[DemDem07]

28. Do you post that everytime you lose a debate?

How sad.

[wyldwolf]

37. only when I've had this debate before

[wyldwolf]

34. .

.

[The Count]

26. The point is that what Drudge's buddies think is of no consequence as they

don't vote in OUR primaries.

[still_one]

thanks, because I won't go to the drudge site /nt

[illinoisprogressive]

9. for the first time I agree with the Drudge report.

[zulchzulu]

12. PUHLEAZE don't link that little twit's web site here!

What was the point? I ain't gwoin' to that site.

[Dinger]

18. Me Neither. Is This A Trick To Me Me Look? Please Just Post The Results If You want Me To Know nt

[mitchtv]

20. WTF? You put a teaser and expect us to visit?

You work for him ? post the results please

[Catherine Vincent]

29. Phuck Drudge! n/t

[Jackpine Radical]

30. Jesus, I just read through this #@$%^& thread.

What the *&^%$#@ is wrong with me? 5 minutes gone irretrievably from my life over this!!

[dweller]

31. i took one for the team ... now, i gotta shower.

Biden
7% 1,767
Clinton
12% 3,050
Dodd
5% 1,273
Edwards
6% 1,526
Gravel
9% 2,166
Kucinich
10% 2,362
Obama
35% 8,733
Richardson
15% 3,766


dp

[bklyncowgirl]

36. Thanks, I wish I'd seen your post before I peeked. Interesting results.

Obama first at 35% is not a shocker. Clinton third at 12% was surprising--I thought she did very well--seemed more natural than last time) as was Edwards at 5%.

The one which stands out is Richardson in second place at 15% and also Gravel and Kucinich at 9% and 10% respectively.

Are the Republicans doing what we did in the GOP debates when we all went out and voted for Ron Paul?

[seabeyond]

39. mkes me wonder op refuse to show the result insisting we go to drudge site

which i have no interest in doing. refuses to post results regardless of the number of requests all down this thread. thank you for putting up the numbers.

[OHdem10]

33. These are strange results---I swear I saw these same

numbers in response to something else. Before the debate.
Not at Drudge. I had not been to Drudge in at least 2 years.

Now , I have to rack my brain.

[ShortnFiery]

35. Oh, please stop promoting that horse's patootie's site? Just report the numbers so we don't have to

add to the traffic?

Remember fellow DUers, every time you click on smarmy Drudge's web site, a Rovarian Hell's Angel gets its winger. :evilgrin: :thumbsdown:

[churchofreality]

38. Because Obama doesnt throw up on himself, he wins?

I'm not impressed by this guy. Hillary, Dodd, and Biden seem much more at ease and have things to say that are relevant and concise. Obama drones forever and CNN lets him go, but cuts off everyone else. If the dems are stupid enought ton nominate this guy, we will lose BIGTIME.