Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BTW- it was *supposed to be* George Allen

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 07:09 AM
Original message
BTW- it was *supposed to be* George Allen
Edited on Mon Jun-04-07 07:12 AM by underpants
Sitting around yesterday morning watching George Will and Cokie and Sam and the ever pettable Stephanopolopagus fret about how none of the Republicans are really doing it for them. Will even said that the Republicans are engaging in Reagan envy (or something to that effect). They all agreed that Fred Thompson is the hot item right now but isn't he really just McCain minus the immigration issue when I remembered the shining beacon on the hill ..... well WAS on the hill










SWEET NECTAR OF LIBERTY!!!

I mean look at him!! That is all you can ask for in a Republican candidate can't you??? (including a horrific fiscal record and ending parole )

I mean Allen actually ran on his father being being the Redskins coach but would have been more than willing to morph pictures of his dad into Ronald Reagan for TV ads (they did foster the same basic look)

But alas no.

I don't mean this as gloating I really don't I just want everyone to remember that given McCain making another "I came in second last time" run and for all the Romneys and Guilianis trying to step into the void that void wouldn't be there if Allen had won with 60% or so of the vote as everyone and I mean EVERYONE (except for Jim Webb) expected.


Now they are rudderless and they are arguing about the wind direction.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Byronic Donating Member (379 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, I AM gloating
Nothing gave me greater pleasure during the mid-terms than Jim Webb's victory over George 'Felix' Allen. After the 'macaca' incident, and the ridiculous attempts to smear Webb over the contents of his novels, I was just desperate for the novellist to overcome the philistine.

For once, the good guys won, and sanity prevailed.

That was the sweetest victory for me in 2006.

And, you're right: it WAS supposed to be George Allen for President in 2008.

So Jim Webb should be thanked twice-over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Welcome to DU
Edited on Mon Jun-04-07 07:24 AM by underpants
if'n I haven't before :hi:

You either are from Va. or you paid really close attention especially at the end. The book thing was brutal and desperate and it didn't work, it very may well have been the final dagger to Allen.

Yes it was oh so sweet.

But hey-there is always Jim Gilmore!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Byronic Donating Member (379 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Thank you!
No, I'm not from Virginia, but I can tell you one thing, there were a lot of Democrats from other states who felt honorary citizens of Virginia the night Webb beat Allen!

You did us proud :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. I do remember hearing them say that yesterday
I wasn't paying too much attention to the talking heads but as you mentioned here, I do remember them bringing up Allen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Oh no they didn't mention Felix
no no no they couldn't bring that up that would be unfair.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chipper Chat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. Allen/Santorum
When FredThompsonMania is on the wane the FundiePubs that control the GOP just may draft these two. What a ticket!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. They were never going to back Santorum. But yes, Allen was being packaged.
I don't have to tell you who I mean by "they," do I?
.`
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. Definitely one of the better side-effects of the dems taking the Senate ...
... was that it meant George Allen couldn't run for president.

I'd like to believe that that clown could never win the presidential race; but, given recent presidential elections ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yes but they were taken completely out of their playbook
they don't do primaries. They don't do internal disagreement. They annoint their guy and then start running a national campaign complete with talk of "leadership" and "vision" and "indecisiveness by those weak Democrats" all packaged up and sent out for mass consumption.

The air of leadership and WINNING is huge. Now they have to slug it out and actually state their beliefs on issues and there is no central campaign to water down analysis of candidate X's history on _______ (insert issue) as liberal bias and so forth.

They haven't had anything close to an actual primary season in over 27 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Not a primary this time either
It's more like blowing the audition and not finding a single decent filler for the role. Should they stumble with this fundamental structural embarrassment into the actual voting booth the winner maybe the one who lines up the most nose-holders to actually form a meager base. they don't want excitement and it will be extremely painful to watch a primary that was never supposed to be a voter choice go on with a cast of non-starters who flunked their auditions for the role in front of the kingmakers. The media will be adrift and helpless trying to report on the competition that was only meant to be for show.

There will a dark smoke of burning ballots(figuratively in this digital age) should a plurality of angry GOP voters surge toward Ron Paul. Romney wins. yay. Come on gang, yaaaay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. And Would be President Fred comes in as the calming voice of reason
Did you know he is 6'6"??? Apparently that is about all it takes, according to Cokie (I would assume that she completely brushed off Gore's height back in 2000)

Great points Patrick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Same with Santorum ...
Living in PA, I regained hope in my state and country that the maniac was put out out of office, and it was not even close ... Make no mistake, especially sans Allen, Santorum WOULD be in the mix right now ... And that dude is just flat INSANE ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Both were the "Next great ones"
the golden childS if you will and both went down in flames
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nedsdag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
12. That's why the Repugs are in the messy state they're in.
Allen was SUPPOSED to be the "chosen one." The one to bring together the evangelicals, moderates, and other conservatives with his "folksy" charm and his "Reaganesque" persona.

It was not to be and I for one am grateful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Yyyyyyep
and Welcome to DU if'n I haven't before :hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaygore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
16. Webb wasn't the only person who thought that Allen would lose
"if Allen had won with 60% or so of the vote as everyone and I mean EVERYONE (except for Jim Webb) expected"

Webb had feet on the street and our feet defeated their $$$$s. Webb won because many, many, many people in Virginia believed he would and worked very hard to make it so. We believed that Webb would win because we had already had enough of that loser Allen, first as governor and then as senator. And, we saw a person of intelligence and integrity in Webb.

If the Republicans in Virginia had not been busy trying to steal the vote for Allen (which they would have been able to do had not one of the cities in Northern Virginia held off reporting their count which went heavily for Webb), the actual margin for Webb would have been much higher.

The United States of America owes a big thanks to thousands of us here in Virginia who worked for Webb's election (especially Susan Mariner in Hampton Roads who rallied many of us early on to the cause). Unlike Texas, we were able to stop an incompetent who claimed to be from our state from becoming president.

And, you are welcome!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Thank you
I didn't work on the campaign-wish I had but well I won't go into that.

I meant that if Webb weren't around, if he had listened to EVERYONE then Allen would have still been able to survive his disasterous cocky self-righteous campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC