mr715
(770 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-04-07 05:01 PM
Original message |
Do you think Al Franken is going to win? |
|
I'm worried, hes down by a lot last I checked.
I really, really hope he wins, though.
M
|
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-04-07 05:02 PM
Response to Original message |
1. What year is his election in? |
mr715
(770 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-04-07 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
KingFlorez
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-04-07 05:03 PM
Response to Original message |
3. The election is a year away, polls aren't really relevant now |
|
I think he has a good chance, but it's too early to make a prediction.
|
Mojambo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-04-07 05:05 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Don't sweat it.
He's going to spank Coleman pretty good.
|
MaineDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-04-07 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Doesn't he have a primary first? |
question everything
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-04-07 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Yes, pretty much a matter of formality |
|
The party convention endorses someone and the non-endorseed usually bow out, so that when the primary arrives, there is only one candidate. Truly an elitist process where the party activists determine the candidates, instead of "we the people."
|
lojasmo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-04-07 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
10. We the people ARE the party activists. YOU TOO could be a delegate. EOM |
question everything
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-04-07 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
13. Thus, you are going to punish individuals |
|
who choose not to be activists by preventing them from choosing their candidates?
After the last primaries someone wrote a letter to the strib saying that "only voters who take the time to really know the candidates should vote."
If this is not elitist I don't know what is.
Last, isn't the number of delegates limited? What if I want to be but the list is closed? (Yes, I know, probably never happened but it could)
|
Common Sense Party
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-05-07 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. I agree. If you haven't taken the time to find out who the candidates |
|
are, or what they believe, or how they will likely vote, then you shouldn't be voting. Know the issues. Know the candidates. Make an INFORMED decision.
Why is that elitist?
You don't have to be rich or privileged to get informed.
Plus, if only the INFORMED people voted, we'd have a lot fewer Freeper-type voters.
|
lojasmo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-06-07 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
17. Non-active people shouldn't chose the candidates. |
|
People can make as much difference as they chose to. I'm saying people who don't vote don't get a say in the overall result either. It's just facts.
|
dflprincess
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-04-07 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
12. It is NOT an elitist process |
|
Anyone may attend their precinct caucus and run as a delegate to their Senate District or County Unit Convention. In most areas, there isn't a contest for the delegate slots and anyone who wants to go on to the next level can. At the District Convention you can run for a position as a state delegate where the endorsing is done.
Unlike a primary system, the caucus system encourages grass roots organizing and the endorsements will go to the candidate(s) who get their people out. Generally, the people who attend the caucuses are better informed about issues and their candidates. A primary system usually bestows success on the candidate with the slickest ad campaign.
It is possible that the endorsed candidate will face a challenge in the primary and quite often the endorsed candidate has lost in the primary - largely because the challenger had more money to spend.
|
jgraz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-04-07 05:33 PM
Response to Original message |
7. In a fair count, Al wins in a walk |
|
Though, given Al's head-in-the-sand position on the 2004 election, it would be somewhat ironic if he lost due to election fraud.
Not that I want that to happen...
|
MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-04-07 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. I think that was more Air America's decision rather than the talent |
|
Randi has mentioned several times that she wasn't allowed to talk about it right after the election. I assume she can say that now because of the change of management.
|
jgraz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-04-07 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. For not being "allowed" to talk about it, she sure talked about it a lot |
|
As did Sam & Janeane and Mike Malloy (and Maron and Rachel, etc, etc, etc). Al was really the only host who refused to even talk about the election irregularities.
|
TheWatcher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-05-07 05:03 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
16. Irony has a funny way of biting one in the ass. |
|
There is a chance Al could have trouble sitting down after election day.
But his head will still be safely in the sand, so it may not register.
|
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-04-07 06:55 PM
Response to Original message |
11. it's too early to be worried or over confident, i am a big fan of Al, i have an al Franken |
|
website and i've sent him money already. Anybody underestimating him would be dead wrong, he is intelligent and thoughtful. Hopefully the public will swing his way and i really think if he wins the democratic primary the debates between him and Norm Coleman will be hella fun to watch.
|
TheWatcher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-05-07 05:01 AM
Response to Original message |
15. Since he is eternally in denial about what happened in Ohio in 2004 |
|
Edited on Tue Jun-05-07 05:02 AM by TheWatcher
I could care less whether he wins or not.
Milquetoast is not the answer.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 02:13 AM
Response to Original message |