Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why haven't we fixed the pardon system - after the Nixion scam

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
goddess40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 08:02 AM
Original message
Why haven't we fixed the pardon system - after the Nixion scam
It should have been done after Ford paid for his presidential appointment with is pardon of Nixon.

What incentive does the law hold against treasonous traitors like those squatting in our White House right now if they know they can pardon their way out of any legal trouble they create for themselves? If we have to rely on honor and ethical values to stop these people we have a government that is ripe for a fascist take-over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. We Need to Fix a Lot of Things
But given the footdragging over the most simple steps, it may take a civil war to get anywhere. That would be expensive, and not certain of good results, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. If assholes can become president - then the problem isn't with ...
... pardons. Either people aren't qualified to elect presidents; or, we need to fix the system so that only an elected person can become president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zensea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. Because it requires a constitutional amendment
and because it is a grey area regarding pardons.
When you are dealing with grey areas in situations it's very hard to get a majority let alone two-thirds of people to agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. We shoulda called the Repukes on their faux outrage over the Marc Rich pardon.
"We totally agree - Clinton misused the presidential pardon power. How about we amend the constitution so any future president would have some checks on that power?"

I guarantee the Marc Rich "outrage" would have stopped before it began.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Marc Rich was an IranContra-BCCI player. The outrage for many of us was that he
Edited on Thu Jun-07-07 10:37 AM by blm
was being pardoned for Poppy Bush's ongoing crimes and NOT the 'tax evader' charges trumpeted by Clinton WH or the RW corporate press who were protecting Rich's ACTUAL involvement with Poppy Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Throwing Stones Donating Member (730 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. The power of the pardon is in the Constitution
The Constitution isn't something to "fixed" in a reactionary way. Is the power abused? yes, but if we're going to tinker with the Constitution, I can think of several other pieces that require more immediate attention, such as the Electoral College and recess appointments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. Should have fixed it after Clinton pardoned Rich too. EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. What exactly do you propose to "fix" the pardon situation?
Eliminate it altogether? Limit it to people who have actually served their time? Limit it to people who belong to a particular political party?

Seriously, what's your proposal? Because changing it requires a Costitutional amendment, and frankly, I don't like the idea of tinkering with the Constitution.

Let's take the Libby case. The Libby prosecution affected the entire nation - it was ongoing news, it uncovered and made public facts that the public needed to know, and it resulted in a conviction that ought to send chills up the back of every administration staffer (of this or future administrations) who is part of any criminal investigation. If Libby is pardoned, those chills will be no less present, because if a future staffer lies and gets caught, there's no guarantee he or she will get the same pardon that Libby is surely going to get.

On top of that, if Bush DOES pardon Libby, that's just one person, but the Bush administration and, by extension, the Repuke party, are going to pay a political price for it.

Bottom line, I don't think the "system" needs fixing at this point. We're talking about PARDONS, not exonerations.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. First, No President Should Be Allowed To Pardon Anyone Who Worked For Him
Either before, during or after his term in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC