Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FReeper letter to Kay Baily Hutchison....Not happy campers over there..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 03:48 PM
Original message
FReeper letter to Kay Baily Hutchison....Not happy campers over there..
Here’s the letter I just sent to Senator Hutchison:

Senator Hutchison,

I am a lifelong conservative and Republican (I voted for Reagan and Gramm when I turned 18 in 1984). In past elections I have supported you, though unenthusiastically, realizing that you were more of a party hack than a principled conservative. Still, you’re generally in the right place, so I’ve tolerated your representation.

Your vote today on the Coburn amendment to the immigration bill is a disgrace. It reveals that you and the more liberal Republicans in the Senate are not committed to the rule of law. The only reason there is an immigration problem is because those of you entrusted with the enforcement of the laws on the books have failed to do so. Now that the issue is seemingly too big a problem to deal with, you throw up your hands and say “we can’t just deport them”. But it is politicians like you who refused to deport them when you could have!

This problem is of your own making. For example - Congress passed a law to build an 800 mile fence on the Mexican border last year. Where is it? Employers of illegal aliens are supposed to be prosecuted. Where is the Bush justice department on this? Are you aware that prosecutions were at least twice as common during Clinton’s administration, back where there were millions less illegals in our country than now?

I’ve tolerated you as my Senator, but no longer. Should you run again, I will donate time, money, and word of mouth to your primary opponent. Should you win the nomination, I will probably just leave your election blank or write in “none of the above”. And should a principled Democrat run against you, I will even vote for him. I would strongly prefer a Zell Miller to a Kay Hutchison. Even a Pat Moynihan, a highly principled liberal, would be an improvement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LBJDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Immigration "Reform"
The Repubs are angry about it. And so am I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StudentsMustUniteNow Donating Member (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think this issue unites disaffected American workers of both parties
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Even a Pat Moynihan, a highly principled liberal, would be an improvement"
Note to triangulating Dems looking for undecided voters...have you been hit with the Clue Stick enough yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. What a great communicator
What a great way to grab someone's interest in a letter--calling them a "party hack" in the first para.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. "I would strongly prefer a Zell Miller to a Kay Hutchison"
:rofl:

What a moran!! Zell Miller principled? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thethinker Donating Member (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. Democrats are being stupid on this issue
This one issue is tearing the republicans apart. Bush is very much behind giving citizenship to the illegals to help his corporation buddies have cheap labor. The vast majority of republican voters are passionately against this. I have never seen some them so upset with their party.

So, how do the democrats play it? They are behind Bush 100%. Is that good strategy? They could have picked up a lot of cross over voters if they had played it smart. Even many republican congress people are not backing Bush on this one. They know better.

The bill before congress benefits no one but corporate America. What is the matter with the Democrats? The fact that Bush wants it so badly should have given them a clue.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unlawflcombatnt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 04:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Right you are
Edited on Sun Jun-10-07 04:31 AM by unlawflcombatnt
"The bill before congress benefits no one but corporate America. What is the matter with the Democrats? The fact that Bush wants it so badly should have given them a clue."

It's just another mechanism to drive down the wages of American workers, by increasing the supply of labor by legalizing all of the currently illegal labor in this country, and allowing (and encouraging) more to flood in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Any evidence for this theory?
"It's just another mechanism to drive down the wages of American workers..."

Is there any evidence for this theory? I've heard this from conspiracy guys like Alex Jones--but never with a shred of proof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Have you found any evidence or proof AGAINST it.?
This is one of those "walks like a duck" things...(By their fruits, and all that)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Can you guarantee it won't drive down wages? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texanshatingbush Donating Member (435 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Actually, I have heard some evidence from reasonable people:
can't remember who or give you a link, but these historical data referenced were hourly wages of employees in the meat packing business: $18-19/hour in about 1980, versus $9/hour now.

Can anyone provide a link or reference for this information?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BikeWriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Super point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
9. my problem with the immigration bill
and with other legislation is the attitude behind it.

The "Patriot Act" and "No child left behind" were passed with the excuse of "it's the best we could do, we know more work on it needs to be done", or the newer version of the excuse "we don't have to votes so we take what we can get"

The immigration bill has the same excuses attached. Is any legislation perfect? No, however this does not give a free pass to enact something that YOU KNOW falls well below a stated purpose. It says "Half-fast crap is better than nothing..."

I've seen the same sort of attitude many times over at various places of employment where a band-aid is applied to "temporarily" fix a problem, and find months later the band-aid is still there as is the problem.

The same is going on now with legislation that has been passed and what's being proposed for whatever problem. It's a quickie band-aid.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texanshatingbush Donating Member (435 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. I believe your statement is encapsulated in the following phrase:
Nothing is as permanent as a temporary solution
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
11. Hutchison is a repuke whore
pretty bad when the freeptards get their undies in a wad over her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
12. "Amnesty", yes, but only after the 'fence' is in place n/t
Edited on Sun Jun-10-07 10:29 AM by guruoo
edit: added quotes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC