Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LA Times Poll: Clinton 33%, Obama 22%, Gore 15%, Edwards 8%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 08:58 AM
Original message
LA Times Poll: Clinton 33%, Obama 22%, Gore 15%, Edwards 8%
June 11, 2007

Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll:

Clinton 33%, Obama 22%, Gore 15%, Edwards 8%

"On the Democratic side of the ledger,the race remains stuck in place:

Hillary Clinton is the party's solid favorite; Barack Obama runs a solid, but clearly distant, second."

Bloomberg Poll
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nancyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. I doubt this.
I have a problem believing that Clinton is s solid favorite. Why? The ones who are solidly for her are the right-wing of the Republican party. They are anxiously waiting the day when they can smear her. If the Democrats proceed with the plan to nominate her they can get ready for 4 more years of being and doing nothing. Does anyone agree with me? Does anyone honestly believe that she would EVER be elected President??? Let's get real here. Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. You said, "Let's get real here. Please." LOL!
I have a problem believing that Clinton is s solid favorite. Why? The ones who are solidly for her are the right-wing of the Republican party.

Let's get real here. Please.

If the Democrats proceed with the plan to nominate her they can get ready for 4 more years of being and doing nothing.

Let's get real here. Please.

Does anyone honestly believe that she would EVER be elected President???

Only the majority of Democrats who responded to the poll. Let's get real here. Please.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Yeah because Koresh knows
....they've done no Hillary smearing at all for the last 15 solid years. It's all Karl Rove's macchiaveliian plot ya know - just PRETEND to go after every single possible shred of stupid innuendo against Hillary and run into brick wall after birck wall of nothing being there for a decade and a half of non-stop talk radio cable news and conservative blog attack doggery - just as a fake sucker setup mind - while really he's got all this damaging lock-solid dirt on her that he's kept absolutely silent about - not a whisper of a leak to anyone - for 15 years knowing that she'll eventually be the nominee and THEN he can let it all out and scuttle her bid for the White House and his plan to install a thrice-married cross dressing gun grabbing gay rights lover from NYC in the oval office will be complete! BWAHAHHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!! Foolish Democrats to not realize my evil plan!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nedsdag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. So Tellurian,
I guess it's over.

No need for me to vote in the New Jersey primary, right?

My vote won't count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. If you want a democrat in the WH...you need to vote for Hillary..
she is the only one who will be on the survivor's list when all is said and done!

So, it would behoove you to place your vote with the strongest candidate, Sen Clinton!

GO HILLARY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nedsdag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Yeah, so was Walter Mondale.
And we saw what happened to him.

I'll vote for her but I'll be the one in the voting booth crying over another forced selection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. save your tears..
for the celebration of getting a Dem FINALLY elected..

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nedsdag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. But what kind of Dem?
A triangulating, DLC lead, stay the course Dem or a Dem who can actually bring together people and not keep us divided?

Apparently, you like the former over the latter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. I mean the kind that can win...the only one is Hillary!
Obama's numbers will only get worse.. He is not up to the task!

He'll learn much finishing out his term and spend more time planning a reelection campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
26. Is that supposed to be snarky?
If so, it is lacking the humorous component necessary, therefore it comes off as just mean. Let me see if I can help.

"Tellurian, you are going to keep posting polls even when HC fades to third, right?" :evilgrin:

Or something like this:

"So Tellurian, do you have some netbot that constantly searches for polls in which HC is ahead or what?"

Maybe this:

"If Bloomberg runs a poll with HC leading, we know it can't be true."

Nah, that one's not so funny. But I think you get the idea. Snark is great. You get to make your point and have a little fun too!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. STOP POSTING GOOD POLL NUMBERS ON CLINTON!
It is demoralizing to people who support other candidates. It forces them to leave the reality-based community and create all manner of conspiracy theories to discredit the polls. It makes the feel like they shouldn't vote at all.

But if ANOTHER candidate does well, by all means, post that. Those polls are gospel! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. mmmm...
we agree most of the time...but, I can't hear you- LOUDER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
23. But good poll numbers are all we have!
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. TPMCafe Election Central's take on this LA poll: Hillary Least Electable Dem, Obama Most Electable
Poll: Hillary Least Electable Dem, Obama Most Electable

A new Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll finds Hillary Clinton losing to the top three Republicans — Rudy Giuliani, John McCain and even the lesser-known Mitt Romney. The other top Democrats all do better. John Edwards tops Romney and McCain, while losing out to Giuliani. Barack Obama is the most electable in this poll, beating Giuliani 46%-41% and doing even better against McCain and Romney. Approval of Congress is at 27%, its lowest level in a decade, down from 36% in January when Democrats took power.

http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2007/jun/12/election_central_morning_roundup#comment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Has the TPM analysis factored in Obama's love for Republicans?
I wonder at times if he'll ask Luger to be his running mate.

Like Kerry did with McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Lugar respects Obama. I see that as a positive--your snarky comments aside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Powell Too?
Just asking...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. In a word, yes. Most of the electorate doesn't follow the Iraq debacle like we do.
And the man is still widely respected in this country, despite everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. Powell is not respected unless you believe media hype..
people haven't forgotten Powell gave his bonafides labeling Saddam Husein a threat to America, holding up a vial of yellow cake at the widely televised UN telenews, bolstering Bush's call for a preemptive strike on Iraq!

People aren't as stupid as you think they are. Where they are asking why Obama is colluding with Republicans, when they are the people we want to get rid of in the next election! Powell is complict in War Crimes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nedsdag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Just because he spoke to Powell
doesn't mean he'll take anything Powell says as gospel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. Who cares!
Powell is as responsible for the push for war as Bush & Cheney...

He should be treated as the outcast that he is and held accountable for the loss of American and Iraqi lives.

I don't want the taint of Republicans on any part of the new President. Why would I?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edwardsfeingold08 Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
11. Why include Gore in the poll?
Where does his 15 percent go if he doesn't run? I assume most of his supporters go to Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
13. Great News.............I'm sure it means nothing as usual, but >>>>>



:woohoo: :woohoo: :yourock: :woohoo: :woohoo:



Thanks for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
14. wow! gore`s running!
when did he announce? dam this is really going to get interesting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
17. Methodology
Note: for more results and poll analysis, visit: http://www.latimes.com/timespoll

Methodology: The Los Angeles Times / Bloomberg Poll contacted 1,183 adults nationwide by telephone June 7 through 10, 2007. Included are 1,056 registered voters, 449 Democratic primary voters and 408 Republican primary voters. "Primary voters" include both registered party members and eligible others who plan to vote in the party primaries. The 2008 presidential election match-up questions were split among two random subgroups of 513 and 543 registered voters respectively. Telephone numbers were chosen randomly from a list of all exchanges in the nation, allowing listed and unlisted numbers to be contacted. Multiple attempts were made to contact each number. Adults were weighted slightly to conform with their respective census proportions by sex, ethnicity, age, education, and national region. The margin of sampling error for all adults and all registered voters is plus or minus 3 percentage points. For Democratic and Republican primary voters, it is plus or minus 5 percentage points. For each of the odd/even subgroups, the margin of error is plus or minus 4 percentage points. For certain other subgroups, the error margin may be somewhat higher. Poll results may also be affected by factors such as question wording and the order in which questions are presented.

Sources: LATimes/Bloomberg Poll


I am on a crusade to include methodology in poll threads :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
21. Gore is NOT RUNNING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geek_Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
22. Gore is not running so why through Gore in this poll
Gore probably would pull votes from Obama and Edwards. This poll is flawed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Do you have a link showing Gore pulling votes from Obama and Edwards?
I haven't seen that trend. I thought I saw Gore votes moving to Clinton. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. I think that's the same thing. eom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
churchofreality Donating Member (545 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
28. She will win the nomination and win the general handily
I think she is looking better and better as this thing goes on. Her debates have been awesome, the bloser we get, more people will pay attention and see how capable and knowledgable she is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC