Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Political Trivia: Mitt Romney related to "Billy The Kid."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 10:29 AM
Original message
Political Trivia: Mitt Romney related to "Billy The Kid."
Edited on Tue Jun-12-07 10:34 AM by wyldwolf
Some genealogists say he (Billy The Kid) was born William Henry Bonney and was son of William Harrison Bonney and wife Katherine Boujean, paternal grandson of Levi Bonney and wife Rhoda Pratt and great-grandson of Obadiah Pratt (Saybrook, Connecticut, September 14, 1742 – Canaan, New York, March 2, 1797) and wife Jemima Tolls (New Haven, Connecticut, August 11, 1754 – Washington, New York, November 24, 1812) (who in turn were the great-great-great-great-grandparents of Mitt Romney).

Wikipedia reference to: http://www.wargs.com/political/romney.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not a descendant then, unless Billy
was shooting off more than his gun out there in the sands of New Mexico.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. heh! Right. Related to, then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. Mitt is related to Ken, Barbie's boyfriend nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Don't forget related to Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Saddam, Mengeli, Blair, Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. According to the ancestry.com website, I am a direct descendant of
Geoffrey Chaucer, the guy who wrote Canterbury Tales. It's interesting in light of my interest in writing, and my niece getting accepted at U of Iowa's graduate writer's program..........

Genealogy is fun. I would have far less interest in history, particularly US colonial/revolutionary period, if I didn't have so darned many ancestors involved in obscure events of the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I agree
I found out an awful lot about the Salem witch trials after I found one ancestor who was foreman of the jury in the Rebecca Nurse trial, and another ancestor who was tried and condemned as a witch (not Rebecca Nurse, though--that would have been toooooo weird!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. uhh, take ANYTHING on Ancestry with a massive grain of salt
There's lots of unadulterated BS posted there, from genealogists who were less than thorough. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I never claimed it was properly documented. Everybody there knows
there's the stuff you know because you've properly researched and documented it, and then there's the other stuff - which could prove to be completely wrong.

I haven't had a close look at what documentation of that hypothetical line there is. With my New England roots there is LOTS, because everybody went to church and all the churches kept detailed BMD records.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Sorry if it seemed like I said you were claiming anything
I was involved with alot of the pre-Ancestry information gathering and quite a lot of it was questionable. And there were genealogists in the past that would make up family history for a price - usually linking families to old-world royals. And this bogus information was being loaded at Ancestry.

Ancestry isn't the only place on the web to verify family roots. Rootsweb.com is one of the best to start at. I tell my gen clients that they should look at Ancestry, but then start doing the work on their own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Because my dad's family was LDS, I have found Ancestry AND
Rootsweb invaluable in tracking down various and sundry cousins, uncles, aunts, in the 20th century. Then I go to the census online at Ancestry and actually FIND them. That census is GREAT, but the indexing is a bit problematic for some years. The online SS death index is priceless, too.

My goal is merely to track back all my lines to original immigrant ancestors. I doubt I will be able to do this in the decades before I die. There are simply too many - most of them came to New England in the 1600s and 1700s. My mom's cousin is the family genealogist (semiprofessional) and I have swiped an awful lot of her work, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. It's fun when you get way back
one of our lines goes back to 900AD in Scotland, another to 1500AD in France, etc. I've been doing genealogy for about 30 years, and I have my stuff at Rootsweb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
10. Whatever anyone says about their underwear and multiple marriages, Mormons make thorough genealogies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. that is because they plan on posthumously baptizing all their ancestors
It's really not a service to humanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC