Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is GOP Senator Kit Bond A Liar Or Just Plain Stupid?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bob Geiger Donating Member (505 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 09:39 AM
Original message
Is GOP Senator Kit Bond A Liar Or Just Plain Stupid?


Lost in the coverage Monday of Senate Republicans blocking the no-confidence vote on Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, was a silly little speech given by Kit Bond (R-MO) about the Iraq war, the Democratic response to the quagmire and, as the Congressional Record labeled it, "Media Bias" in reporting on the American occupation.

Bond covered all the usual Republican bases, saying that Congress should not oppose the war because "it is critical that we not fall into this trap set by al-Qaida" and that withdrawal resolutions tell "the Sunni terror cells and the Shia militias that America's political will is wavering."

Blah, blah, blah.

But this time, Bond, who recently returned from a trip to Iraq that I'm sure included John McCain-like protection and carefully-selected photo opportunities, said that what he's seen in Iraq compared to recent media coverage at home tells him that the horrible liberal press is once again doing its hate-America thing.

"We had the opportunity to meet with the commanding officers and troops on each location," said Bond of his trip. "On the floor of the Senate I spoke to you about witnessing firsthand some of the progress being made. Since I have seen so little coverage of that progress, I think progress bears repeating."

Bond then gave a glowing report of how well things are going on the ground in Iraq.

"The new plan, the counterinsurgency plan, is showing initial signs of progress. Violence in al-Qaim, Haditha, Hit, Ramadi, and Fallujah has dramatically decreased due to local leaders now siding with coalition forces pursuing al-Qaida in Iraq," declared Bond. "In Baghdad, U.S. and Iraqi security forces are clearing and holding some of the most dangerous areas, and sectarian violence has decreased."

So I decided to go to one of the prime sources of liberal media bias, the place where I'm sure we'll see a real slant against how peachy things are going in Iraq -- Stars and Stripes military newspaper.

"Violence outside Baghdad on the rise since ‘surge’ started," proclaims a headline in today's Stars and Stripes, in which they describe a quarterly United Nations report on the situation in Iraq.

“The situation in Iraq remains precarious. Insurgent attacks persist and civilian casualties continue to mount,” Stars and Stripes quotes the report as saying. “While there was a brief lull in the level of sectarian violence early in the reporting period, it now appears that militia forces are resuming their activities, including targeted killings and kidnappings.”

And more:
“The security situation has been further compounded by the increase in car bombs in the vicinity of entry checkpoints” to the Green Zone, the report found.

The report also noted that in Baghdad military casualties have gone up as civilian casualties have gone down.
Ouch.

But this is nothing new from those left-wing naysayers at Stars and Stripes. On Sunday, they ignored how swimmingly things are going in Iraq by publishing a story called "Iraqi district struggles to accommodate families fleeing violence in other parts of the country."

The article talks about 4,000 Iraqi families who have fled civil-war violence in one part of Baghdad for another, cites a U.N. report that says "more than 2 million Iraqis have been displaced inside Iraq" and echoes the belief of international aid groups that what's happening there is "a humanitarian crisis."

Bond, who ironically enough, is the ranking Republican member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, went on to complain about the media bias evident in reporting on an attack that took place in Fallujah at the end of May in which up to 25 people were killed by a suicide bomber near a police recruiting station.

Based on an e-mail he claims to have received from one soldier in Fallujah, the Missouri Republican took both the Baltimore Sun and the Los Angeles Times to task for their coverage saying "A number of media outlets carried these headlines. From the Baltimore Sun, 'Attack on Iraq Police, At Least 20 Dead.' From the Los Angeles Times, 'Twenty Iraqis Die in Suicide Attacks.'"

According to Bond, the e-mail he received said that the soldier had "…checked it out every way he could, but it appears to have been a false report."

"The headlines refer to the failed attack but depicted a dramatically different outcome," said Bond. "There has been no apparent retraction, so thousands upon thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands who saw the headline assumed yet another tragic incident occurred in Fallujah and just lumped that in with all the other bad news that makes up a grim picture of Iraq. And you see why our men and women fighting over there are frustrated."

Eager to see how some other liberal rags handled this coverage, I went over to the Army Times and the Marine Corps Times to see what half-baked, leftist propaganda they would be spewing.

They both had the same headline, from the same Associated Press story on May 31: "Suicide bomb at police recruit station kills 25," and they go on to give the news to their military audience that " A suicide bomber hit a police recruiting center in Fallujah on Thursday, killing at least 25 people and wounding 50, police said."

Neither has issued the retraction that Bond seeks which naturally begs the question: Why do the Army Times and the Marine Corps Times hate the troops?

It should also be noted that those rat-bastard communists at the Wall Street Journal ran the same report and have also failed to take it back, based on Bond's e-mail source.

But Senator Bond ended his speech on Monday with an odd reference that pretty much tells us where his head is at.
"I was able to see an article, a TV story by Ollie North this past Sunday, a war story. He was talking about the good old days in World War II. If there was anything good about the old days in World War II, Hollywood and the media were on the same side as our troops. What a wonderful vestige of the old times."
As opposed to the likes of Stars and Stripes and the Army Times who we know, of course, are in bed with Osama and hate America.

Freakin' liberal media.

You can read more from Bob at BobGeiger.com.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes
Those are not mutually exclusive choices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. R = Stupid Liar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm gonna go with stupid liar...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shain from kane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. Probably drunk. What time in the morning was it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
potisok Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. A generous mix of both?
Over the years he has been rather consistent in matters ie. Lack of honesty and intelligence. His track record speaks for its self.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
6. All of the above
He also has been rumored for years to have a bit of a drinking problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. No wonder he and the chimp get along so famously...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. you should have a poll
I vote for Both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
9. GOP is by definition both
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhiannon55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
10. He was a stupid liar when he was governor of Missouri
and he's a stupid liar still.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamahaingttta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. I vote for Just Plain Stupid.
But then, we've always known that about Bond, haven't we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. Oh, don't get me started on Kit Bond.
At hearings and press conferences, he's always bound to open his mouth and say something ignorant, and his grasp of reality is tenuous at best.

The people of Missouri have a lot of 'splaining to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. "it is critical that we not fall into this trap set by al-Qaida"
So he is saying that the United States is stupid enough to fall into al-Qaida's trap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. Both?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
15. "Good old days in WW 2"
Yeah, when America actually had a real reason to go to war and a real enemy to go after. Now, it seems that we are fighting somebody somewhere for some reason. Osama Bin Laden? Uh... no. Fighting the terrorists "over there"? Ooooohhhh, so thats why people are plotting to blow up gas lines in NYC. Because they are in Iraq... um, wait that's untrue also. Hussein had weapons of mass destruction... not yet, nor ever. Iraq had everything to do with 9/11...that is so fuckin' stupid I am not really sure why I wrote it. So, no real enemy, no real reason, and "Liberal" Hollywood. Yep, now it makes sense. At least to Bond. I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC