Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Edwards gets rural right

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 11:20 PM
Original message
Edwards gets rural right
Opinion: Edwards gets rural right
(Madison, WI) Capital Times
Wednesday, June 13, 2007

----
(...)
This year, Edwards has done a lot better.

His Rural Recovery Act, which was issued recently by the campaign, is far savvier than the one peddled four years ago by the Edwards camp. It lines up the candidate for the 2008 Democratic nomination with working farmers rather than the big agribusiness interests that his 2003 plan would have aided. It promises that Edwards "will strictly enforce laws against anti-competitive mergers and unfair pricing, and will support country-of-origin labeling laws."

It also pledges that Edwards will oppose consolidation of ownership of food processing companies, crack down on the abuses of factory farms, and make sure that farm subsidies go to farmers who actually work the land -- as opposed to corporate interests and hobbyists.

The Edwards plan puts him in sync with progressive rural groups such as the National Farmers Union and the National Family Farm Coalition on many, if not all, issues. And it displays an understanding of the great challenges facing rural regions, which are often on the losing end of the "two Americas" equation that is the theme of the Edwards campaign.

There are smart commitments to ending predatory lending and other unfair banking practices that are particularly prevalent in rural America, to investing in rural broadband access, and to improving rural health care.

Underpinning the whole of the Edwards plan is a recognition that federal government investments that are labeled "rural" do not always go to farm country and small-town America.

"More than half of the U.S. Department of Agriculture's $70 billion in rural development funds has gone to metropolitan regions, suburbs, and resort towns like Martha's Vineyard," the plan explains. "Edwards will rewrite funding rules to bring resources to needy rural areas."
(...)
----
Read the rest here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. sounds good...I'm "listening"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. He gets it...
"Underpinning the whole of the Edwards plan is a recognition that federal government investments that are labeled "rural" do not always go to farm country and small-town America."

He's not going to pander to big corporations and that's what is scaring the media....I can't wait until the Edwards family is in the WH in '09.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. I Can't Understand Why He's Sinking in the Polls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. He's not getting any favorable media exposure. It's Hillary/Obama; Obama/Hillary 24/7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. He is the only one even talking to the 16% of voters who live in rural areas nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 15th 2024, 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC