Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lieberman: Let's Murder 2.6 Million Iranians Now!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 08:03 AM
Original message
Lieberman: Let's Murder 2.6 Million Iranians Now!
Edited on Sat Jun-16-07 08:04 AM by sellitman
Lieberman: Let's Murder 2.6 Million Iranians Now!
by dick bell
Thu Jun 14, 2007 at 04:08:21 PM PDT

Should we not consider Joe Lieberman to be psychotic and in need of immediate hospitalization?

In his war cry to attack Iran, Joe Lieberman is actually calling for the immediate deaths of at least 2.6 million Iranians, assuming that the United States uses nuclear weapons ("earth penetrators") , as has been so carefully planned by the Pentagon, to "dig out" Iran's nuclear weapons production facilities. (Source: Physicians for Social Responsibility.)

* dick bell's diary :: ::
*

What does Joe Lieberman think would be the result of acting on his insane words that the U.S. bomb Iran? Does he have even the remotest comprehension of how many people would die if the U.S. attacked Iran's nuclear weapons facilities with nuclear weapons? How about 2.6 million IMMEDIATE deaths!

More: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/6/14/19257/4339

--I'm a CT Jew who considers himself a Zionist to a point , yet this monster I have as a Senator has to go. We must make him irrelevant in 2008. Once we have the votes to do that he must be treated like the pond scum he is. It cannot happen soon enough.- Kevin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
crim son Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. This asshole could have been our VP.
I agree; his irrelevance cannot happen soon enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think Gore would have made sure Joe was on the sidelines.
At least I would hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. He could have been the incumbent VP running for President and leading in the polls
The 2008 ticket could have been this:

Lieberman/Clinton '08
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crim son Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Jeepers H. Creepers.
Edited on Sun Jun-17-07 08:48 AM by crim son
The nightmare ticket.

edited for typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. Well, the devil himself would have been an improvement on Cheney!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. Joe Lieberman is a lot like Bush.
He has allusions of grandeur. Lieberman wants to look like a hero in the eyes of some Israeli hawks. However like Bush, Lieberman will go down in flames.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. The man is an AIPAC tool.
Edited on Sat Jun-16-07 08:28 AM by Totally Committed
He should have been honest and called his new party "AIPAC for Lieberman".

I wish the people from CT could find a way to recall him. He's a lying ghoul of a warmonger.

TC

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Not with their allies like Bill Clinton quietly backing them every step of the way.
Ever notice that neither Clinton publicly opposes these policy statements from Joe or Bush?

Too busy undermining any Dem who DOES speak against those policies.


This talk by historian Douglas Brinkley occurred in April 2004:


http://www.depauw.edu/news/index.asp?id=13354


Whom does the biographer think his subject will pick as a running mate? Not Hillary Rodham Clinton. "There's really two different Democratic parties right now: there's the Clintons and Terry McAuliffe and the DNC and then there's the Kerry upstarts. John Kerry had one of the great advantages in life by being considered to get the nomination in December. He watched every Democrat in the country flee from him, and the Clintons really stick the knife in his back a bunch of times, so he's able to really see who was loyal to him and who wasn't. That's a very useful thing in life."




http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/coffeehouse/2006/oct/07/did_carville_tip_bush_off_to_kerry_strategy_woodward



Did Carville Tip Bush Off to Kerry Strategy (Woodward)

By M.J. Rosenberg |

I just came across a troubling incident that Bob Woodward reports in his new book. Very troubling.
On page 344, Woodward describes the doings at the White House in the early morning hours of Wednesday, the day after the '04 election.

Apparently, Kerry had decided not to concede. There were 250,000 outstanding ballots in Ohio.

So Kerry decides to fight. In fact, he considers going to Ohio to camp out with his voters until there is a recount. This is the last thing the White House needs, especially after Florida 2000.

So what happened?

James Carville gets on the phone with his wife, Mary Matalin, who is at the White House with Bush.

"Carville told her he had some inside news. The Kerry campaign was going to challenge the provisional ballots in Ohio -- perhaps up to 250,000 of them. 'I don't agree with it, Carville said. I'm just telling you that's what they're talking about.'

"Matalin went to Cheney to report...You better tell the President Cheney told her."

Matalin does, advising Bush that "somebody in authority needed to get in touch with J. Kenneth Blackwell, the Republican Secretary of State in Ohio who would be in charge of any challenge to the provisional votes." An SOS goes out to Blackwell.
>>>>>>>>




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dk1k0nUWEQg




Wonder why?


http://consortiumnews.com/2006/111106.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. Peace Train.... this is for you Joe, get a brain.
www.lucasgray.com/video/peacetrain.swf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. I have seen that video before, and I love it!
Thank you for posting that here this morning.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. The red and blue camps
Edited on Wed Jun-27-07 12:21 PM by Robson
The more I see the disconnected with reality happenings in DC, the more I believe the root problem is not one of Democrats versus Republicans, but primarily one of rich elitists, corporatists with large economic interests (and those with strong ties to such), who wish to manipulate the 90-95% of Americans to the aforementioned group's benefit (economic and political) through the many peripheral issues into red and blue camps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shenmue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. Baker Act, anyone?
He's a danger to himself and others. What an asshole.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. Unfortunately you will have to wait until 2012 to elect another Senator
But, making him irrelevant in 2008 can be done by electing enough Senators to give the Democrats a margin that makes his support unimportant. As an independent the Democrats will not be obligated to give him any choice committee assignments. If he wants a choice committee assignment with the majority party he will have to keep his mouth in order or suffer removal. If he swings to the opposition party he could still get a choice committee assignment but what a minority party member can do is limited especially one that is new to a party. I doubt the Republican Party would give him top spot in any choice committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Since we cannot pass anything in the Senate now
We probably should give him the boot now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
9. 2 million Iraqis killed, maimed or displaced not enough for Joe?
Worst humanitarian crisis in history not enough for Joe?
Is Joe just trying to get back on MTP by out-stupiding the neocons?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC