Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Red States Hillary can win or be competitive in

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 03:26 AM
Original message
Red States Hillary can win or be competitive in
She will hold all the 2004 Kerry states regardless who wins the republican primary. Giuliani is much ado about nothing. He has so much baggage that in a general election campaign he will implode just like he did during his initial campaign against Hillary for the senate.

There is no chance Romney and Thompson will flip any 2004 Kerry states. McCain is pretty much a non entity at this point.

So that leaves us with the states Hillary can win or be competitive in:

* Arkansas - can win (Big Dawg will make sure of it)
* Florida - can be competitive in
* Virginia - can be competitive in
* West Virginia - can be competitive in
* Iowa - can win
* Missouri - can win
* Ohio - can win
* New Mexico - can win
* Arizona - can be competitive in
* Colorado - can win
* Nevada - can win

That's 11 states she can potentially flip in my estimation. She only really needs Ohio to win. But combinations of a handful of the others can most certainly work as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLL!!!!
Whatever you say Hermie..

You are such a dedicated HRC'er ~ good for you!!!

But..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 03:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. You're looking at a best case scenario, which is fine for now
But a year from now is when things really count.

At this stage of the game you might as well speculate
about a ticket of Joe Biden and Bill Richardson against
Sam Brownback and Mike Huckabee.

Yes, Hillary looks strong now, at least for the nomination,
but there is a lot of water to yet flow under the bridge.
There are few things to consider: the right wing's hate
machine is locked and loaded should she be the nominee, even
though they would have less to fear from her as President than
they would from Edwards or Al Gore. We don't know who her VP
choice would be, and we don't know if Al Gore will decide to
run after all, and trash every prediction yet made about where
we will stand in 12 or 16 months.

Plus--with the mechanism of tried and true Republican electoral
fraud already in place, and time running out to clean house (make
that disinfect, as they stink) before November, 2008, we need not
only to win those marginal states, but win decisively. If she is the
nominee, due to her baggage, perceived as well as real, she will not
have an easy road to 1600. It CAN happen, but it's too early to bet
your inheritance on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 04:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. She can win any red State any other Dem can win if not more of them.
Edited on Mon Jun-18-07 04:30 AM by William769
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 04:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yeah, come to think of it.. Kucinich could take Idaho and Texas easily too..
Edited on Mon Jun-18-07 04:27 AM by larissa
Well... ..At least that's what his supporters keep saying on here!

I guess the moral to this whole story is..

Be happy and support who YOU think can win.

And just be prepared for a Plan B if it doesn't work out.

Easy enough!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. LOL!!!
You Hillary supporters sure have been funny lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. We are funny, serious, but most of all dedicated
Which of course will hake her to be the Next President of the United States. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueManDude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. Zero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nedsdag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
32. I agree.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. Yeah, but those are states ANY Democratic nominee should have a chance at
The question with Hillary: Does she negate or even reverse our generic advantage in '08?

The only state on that list with a major GOP partisan index edge (comparison of state voting pattern to national) of nearly 10 points is Arizona. Everything else is reasonable although we're bigger underdogs in Missouri and West Virginia than is generally agreed upon.

And don't be too sure about Arkansas. The favorite son (daughter, whatever) dynamic won't be fully in play with Hillary, and even if it were, a state gets blase after a while so you don't get the full boost. That's what happened in Tennessee in 2000. They had already seen Gore on a national ticket in '92 and '96 so it was no longer a big deal. He would have received a much larger bump as a first timer. Similarly, Arkansas isn't going to go wild for Hillary after having Bill atop the ticket in '92 and '96. It's one of the reasons I hope we consider Mark Warner for VP. You'll get a big boost there, even at VP, since Virginia hasn't been represented on a national ticket in so long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
8. I don't think anyone will be competitive in West Virginia
That state has shifted rightward in the past decade. It's weird because it went for Dukakis in '88 but Bush won it in a landslide in '04.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Just like Virginia has trended the other way - more Democratic.
Maybe VA will surprise some folks, and make us happy, in '08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. Well... I Live In Florida & I SERIOUSLY Doubt This His One Of Her
"good to win" states. I get asked all the time if I support her because I have bumper stickers all over my car.

Of course I DO live in a "red" county, but most Dems I talk to either like Obama or Edwards. Just a little input from my little part of the world.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
churchofreality Donating Member (545 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yep, I agree.
All she needs is Ohio or Florida, but other combos are possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ripple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
13. This could be changed to read
Red states Obama is more likely than Hillary to win or be competitive in.

After all, he is polling much better than Hillary in head to head match-ups with potential republican nominees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. Which could be changed again to read
Red states Edwards is more likely than Obama who is more likely than Hillary to win or be competitive in.

After all, he is polling much better than Hillary in head to head match-ups with potential republican nominees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ripple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. LOL, that it could
Although Obama is also polling ahead of Edwards in head to head matchups with republicans.;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. That is a best case scenario...
The Hillary detractors have so internalized the meme that Hillary has no chance in the general that you will be slammed for this...but the fact is under ideal circumstances all of these states would be in play with a Hillary candidacy...

Arkansas is a good bet...I've seen polls (kinda old now), that have her well ahead there

Florida - no worse chance than past Democratic candidates, and with her potential appeal to women, not at all out of reach

Virginia (my home state) - My take is probably not likely, but definitely worth money to keep Republicans pinned down...

West Virginia - Depends on how the gun issue plays...her appeal to union households could help her here

Iowa - I think this will go Dem no matter who the nominee is

Missouri - Not out of the question, but less likely

Ohio - Have seen a number of polls showing her beating Republican candidates here...Ohio will go Dem

New Mexico - Prime pick up opportunity here

Arizona - Less likely, but not out of the question. If McCain is the nominee forget it

Colorado - Could be a big surprise win here

Nevada - My upset special. Hillary will take it if she is the nominee..

If I had to guess now, Hillary takes Ohio, Iowa, Nevada, New Mexico, and Arkansas...with Florida and Colorado just behind...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemDogs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. You forget what they will do to her. What she has allowed to be done to her
Imagine the R's GOTV in Arkansas -- I'm not betting she wins Iowa.

Florida - no better but maybe worse than other D candidates who are not hated as much, I would guess

Virginia - Have to take some military family vote and just cannot see it in a state where Webb shows what a real D who cares about military issues sounds like. More Ds stay at home in Virginia, too, I'd guess: those who know her best.

West Virginia - Under no circumstances will she even campaign there. And what makes you think NAFTA Jane is popular with union households?

Iowa - "I think this will go Dem no matter who the nominee is" This may be right but why chance a D running third now. Why do you think Mike Henry of her campaign suggested not doing the caucuses? Think he had polling info you don't have. I do.

Missouri - She will not campaign there.

Ohio - Ohio may go Dem, but she is our worst chance there. Ohio jobs killed by NAFTA. Local candidates don't want her at the top of the ticket. And in 2004, the R's really got out the vote to beat Kerry who got more votes than Gore. Imagine what they will do in 2008, and what they have to work with?

New Mexico - If nominated, she doesn't pick Richardson, who is too much like Bill, and his half-hearted support is a problem for every D

Arizona - Hillary adds nothing.

Colorado - Hillary adds nothing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. RW attacks are like a virus...
Those that have been attacked before build up an immunity...those that have not, are vulnerable...

Even Hillary detractors have discounted the myriad bogus scandals surrounding the Clinton's. Everytime they are attacked they become more popular...

On the other hand, one who has not been attacked extensively is vulnerable...hence Swift Boat has legs...

I hope the rw attack machine cranks up against Hillary, will simply prove she is the superior candidate at dealing with it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. How I wish you would leave your office and visit the real world sometime
The one where Hillary is a horribly flawed candidate with the baggage of an organization that believes in an election strategy that is a sure loser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. How I wish...
You would pull your head out of the sand, and recognize the left/right wing meme that Hillary is not electable is simply false...

btw: Where do you suppose I work? You seem to have made a conclusion about me based on the fact I disagree with you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. ok tell me your pet campaign isn't based inside the beltway
Edited on Mon Jun-18-07 05:04 PM by Capn Sunshine
Tell me the genesis for all of its philosophy is not located there or at a think tank in Va, which is just a suburb of the beltway ?

BTW I concluded Hillary's inelectabilty long before it was popular. It's not that I don't like her, I do. I have some nice photos of HRC in my personal collection. I've spent time with her; I think she has charisma. I respect what she's done. But it's important that a Democrat win the WH this time around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Funny...
I am a small business owner in Northern Virginia, active in local civic life, active in local politics, am a precinct captain, so as you can see...I do live in the real world... I support Hillary because I believe she would make the best President...am not privy to her campaign in any way...but.

Looks to me like her campaign strategy is based largely on that of the last Democratic candidate to win the white house...and seems to be working quite well so far...

Do I have more confidence in the political judgment of two people (Bill and Hillary Clinton), who combined are 10-2 in state and national campaigns, including two terms as President and two as Senator, than in the other candidates...you bet I do...and I have seen nothing to persuade me otherwise.

I do not want yet another Democratic candidate (Dukakis, Gore, Kerry), that looks like a frightened deer when attacked by the right wing...I want one that has been through the wringer, been the subject of attack and has a demonstrated ability to deal with it effectively and ruthlessly...

My assessment of Hillary's chance are not solely derived from polls 17 months out, but on her demonstrated skill as a campaigner. She is the one person about whom I do not have to worry when attacked by the rw sleaze machine. Can't say that about any of the others...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
22. That post is right out of the Twilight Zone. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
election_2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
24. And Obama/Edwards/Richardson *couldn't* be competitive in those same states....?
Edited on Mon Jun-18-07 11:11 PM by election_2004
Richardson, especially, would probably be even more competitive in those states than Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
25. standin' downtown at the railway station...one toke over the line.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redneck Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
26. I like wake 'n' bake as much as the next guy, but...
Edited on Tue Jun-19-07 09:30 AM by Redneck Socialist
but four twenty six's a little early to be hittin' the bong that hard. LOL!


4:20/insanely optimistic Hilary post. Coincidence? I don't think so. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
27. Ohio a "can win" for Hillary?
Uh, NO.

FAR too many rural (red) counties housing Fox News junkies, conservatard Christians, males who would "never stand for a female runnin' this country". One major city (Cincinnati) in a red county. 3-5 lavender counties. Cuyahoga, despite being heavily blue, has many Hillary haters residing here. Us, Lorain, Mahoning, Trumbull, Franklin and Athens cannot carry the state. You'd have a hard time selling your polarizing windsock in a state that's been trained to hate anything Clinton since the 90s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
29. Wait, let me catch my breath?
:rofl:

*I learned this quip from wyldwolf. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
30. With all due respect, you live in a dream world...
if you really believe that.

Democrats and Left-Leaning Indies I know won't even vote for her, and Red Staters will? I don't think so.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
31. OTOH she could lose
Ohio, New Hampshire (to Romney), Iowa, Wisconsin, etc... and then we're f'd.

Here's a map I did with the same EV totals from 2004 looking at certain scenarios.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC