Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, how do we use what we learned from the Lieberman experience?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JAYJDF Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 02:59 PM
Original message
So, how do we use what we learned from the Lieberman experience?
Face it, he was only elected because of the repuks.

So, since most Dems just want a Dem elected, do we register repuk so we can screw with the primaries?

I ask only because I still am not satisfied that the next election is going to be fair.

I am afraid that election fraud is alive and well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. No, he was elected because CT law allowed him to scam the system
Once he lost the primary, he shouldn't have been able to kick-off an independent second bite at the apple. That's why he won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalkydem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. not to mention
He's a crook
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. What the hell do you mean?

"most Dems just want a Dem elected"

Here in Illinois we had a Democratic gubernatorial candidate start campaigning FOR HIS REPUBLICAN OPPONENT one election because he got saddled with a nutcase running mate out of the primary. I believe most Dems want what they believe is best for this country.

For that matter, your own example misproves your statement. If all Democrats wanted was to elect someone with a (D) after their name, the Democrats in Connecticut would have re-nominated Lieberman. They voted him out of the Democratic party precisely because they wanted something more than just any Dem.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joffan Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. And...
the Democratic primaries in CT were not skewed. Why would you want to mess with the Republican primaries? Who would you want to finagle into place, come to that? A moderate Repub with a higher chance of electablility? A screaming Bushbot that makes Lieberman look more moderate?

Frustration I understand. Don't let it get translated into pointless gestures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JAYJDF Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I read here all the time that whomever gets the Dem primary nod
will be well supported by us Dems.
Doesn't that mean vote for any Dem?
Yeah, I agree that there are very different Dem reps but bottom line seems to be to get a Dem elected.

Like my final opinion, it's all eye wash if the election process isn't fixed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Didn't that happen 25 years ago?
"Here in Illinois we had a Democratic gubernatorial candidate start campaigning FOR HIS REPUBLICAN OPPONENT one election because he got saddled with a nutcase running mate out of the primary. I believe most Dems want what they believe is best for this country."

Are you not referring to Adlai Stevenson III's 1982 gubernatorial election? You really couldn't find a more recent example?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Yeah, I sort of remember that
Can't remember the Democratic candidate's name at this moment, but didn't he get some La Rouche cultist as a running mate? It was sad really. But in reality, is Blago any better? As a border person, I look in on Illinois politics from time to time and Blago doesn't seem like the best Governor the state has ever seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Blagojevich is a disappointment.

He refuses to face harsh realities and promises more than he can deliver. He is also greatly faulted for not getting along with Democrats in Springfield, but that may not be his fault. If those Democrats really are as crooked as everyone says they are, then shouldn't he keep his distance?

He gets a really bum rap on ethics issues. One of the first things he does in office is use his authority to shut down a dump that had been operating illegally for years under Republican administrations. The dump itself was owned by an in-law of Blagojevich's. So he does the right thing in shutting it down as soon as he has the power to do so, but gets himself forever associated with the very wrong he chose to right.

And then there is the Rezko thing. EVERYBODY appears to have trusted Rezko. Obama, Blagojevich and Daley. Accordingly, Blagojevich gives him the job of contracting out state work. And Rezko starts shaking down the contractors. Blagojevich finds out and immediately fires the guy. Prior to this, nobody ever accused Rezko of doing anything wrong. So it's hard to blame Blagojevich for not anticipating Rezko's actions when nobody else did either.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Don't forget the flu vaccine shortage, too
Fought w/hubby over that one up through the election. When they announced there would be a shortage of vaccines, Blago secured doses for Illinois citizens and Bush had them stopped at the ports. We still ended up paying the tab though. But, I'm betting that if it had been Sonny Perdue, Haley Barbour, or Jeb Bush those doses would have shipped right through without a hitch!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. you can't hurt the repukes by registering as one. If you vote for a moderate in the primaries,
that helps them.

If you vote for the biggest dipshit hillbilly, he could actually win and you would have helped propel us into the third term of DELIVERANCE: the White House Years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. It's tempting...very tempting
If nothing else, I'd get on their mailing list. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. that would have some entertainment value: "please join us in prayer for the elimination of
the estate tax."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. we need to be better at pointing at that "moderates/mavericks" aren't better politicians by way of
their ideology or political affiliation.

We lost that race because Independents voted in droves for Lieberman, even those holding the lowest opinions of the war and the Bush administration, because of the myth that as a supposed independent, he would better represent them in Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. That Is An Excellent Point, Sir
This whole 'parties are bad' thing has gotten well past any conceivable usefulness. The more splintered the whole, the smaller the determined clique that can manage to drive and control events....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. Lieberman exploited a loophole in state election laws
in Connecticut that allowed him to refile on another party line after losing in a primary. Most states do not allow this sort of gross idiocy. What we learned, or what I learned from that sorry episode was that if we energize the base and run a good candidate we can knock out dipshit corrupt dinos. The blogbarians helped fund and energize the Lamont campaign, and we can and must do this again and again until we, the people, once again have a progressive party of the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC