Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ralph Nader is a political predator, and I am his Chris Hansen.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 05:39 PM
Original message
Ralph Nader is a political predator, and I am his Chris Hansen.
There is much talk today about Nader signaling his intentions to get involved in the 2008 presidential race. I have stated before that I think Nader is similar to Stalin, Nader is similar to Michael Jackson, and his supporters would vote for Pat Buchanan or Ted Kaczynski were he not running.

This is a man who preys on impressionable minds, and twists them to his own ends. Notice how often he tries to recruit college students - white, middle-upper middle class college students who use their priveledge of wasting their votes - to do his bidding.

He will not do this unopposed. If he enters the race, I am planning to produce hit pieces on him from now until the election. Many people have a primary focus in their political activities, and mine will be to be against Nader.

I will be Chris Hansen to Ralph Nader's political predations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. ...
:popcorn: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. omg.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. Do it.
But do it in an arena broader than DU. Get the word out. Nader must be not only defeated but humiliated.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. You need help.
Have you told your psychologist that you're making these posts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. If Nadar were serious about serving as an elected official, he'll start
with the House of Rep. He just wants to be a spoiler, and believe me, this time around, he's going to get hostility from the least likely places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downtown Hound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. BINGO!
Notice how Nader basically lays low and doesn't do shit in between elections? But when the election rolls around, oh boy! HEEEERREE'S RALPHIE!

What kills me is how is always uses the excuse that he is building a vast progressive grassroots with his presidential runs. Uh, Ralph, you've been at this for years now, and in that time the only contribution I've ever seen you make to the grassroots is to effectively bankrupt the Green Party and kill it's potential as an up and coming third party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Really. What the hell has he done lately? What has he done to
prepare himself for any political office? The guy is a deadbeat, has-been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. Start with a look into his finances
that's always an interesting read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. I am sure he is really frightened that you are going to say "dooga, dooga, dooga" to him
Please, don't show us any more videos of your campaign tactics though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. This is 2007
He's old news.

It's ridiculous.

Who cares?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. I agree it is ridiculous, Nader has lost most his previous supporters.
Focusing on a man who will get only a small handful of votes seems ridiculous when we could be focused on the Republican candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Are you talking about /this/ video?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Yep, that is the one sadly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #20
34. LOL!!!
That poor guy, he's like all of them. Idealistic, unaware of his use as a pawn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
12. Wonderful LoZoccolo! Have you seen this piece --
http://soc.qc.cuny.edu/Staff/levine/Ralph-Nader-As-Suicide-Bomber.html

RALPH NADER AS MAD BOMBER
_______________________________________________


Harry G. Levine

Department of Sociology, Queens College, City University of New York
March 2004 / hglevine@hereinstead.com

In the year 2000, Ralph Nader strapped political dynamite onto himself and walked into one of the closest elections in American history hoping to blow it up. He wanted to punish the Clinton-Gore Democrats for having betrayed him and the causes he believes in. His primary campaign mission was defeating Al Gore, but Nader concealed this from his supporters, even as he went after votes in swing states like Florida. On the day after election day, when everyone else was grim, and many Democrats were furious at him, Ralph Nader was a happy man.

The following essay presents evidence for this large claim and describes how I first learned this in the fall of 2000. Since the election, political discussions about Nader's campaign have often focused on its electoral effect. Did Nader's 97,000 votes in Florida defeat Al Gore making George W. Bush president? Most observers seem to agree that they did, but others insist that many factors defeated Gore. However, independent of the effect of the Nader campaign on the election results, one can ask about what Nader wanted to have happen. Now that he has decided to run again, in what promises to be another very close election, it is worth examining what Ralph Nader intended the last time.

SNIP

Nader also said many things that I did not think were true. He returned again and again to how Al Gore and George W. Bush were like "Tweedledee and Tweedledum," Lewis Carroll's obnoxious twins. They look and act the same, so it doesn't matter which one you get. Despite all the indications that this was to be a very close election, Nader also said that he couldn't possibly take the election from Gore -- "only Gore can do that." In effect Nader told people to ignore concerns about the handful of swing states where Nader voters might shift the electoral votes to Bush. Because there had been little media coverage of Nader's message at this stage, (especially in New York newspapers) one had to get close to the campaign to hear these things.

That night I received an email from an old friend, Ira Glasser, who had dealt with Nader occasionally over the years. Ira distrusted Nader and offered his educated guess that Nader would not withdraw anywhere because he "wants to punish the Democrats."

SNIP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Good find; thank you very much!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. Have a decoy lead him to a house where he thinks RNC operatives await
ready to sign him onto ballots, fund his campaign, and fuel him with ammo against the Democrats...

You'll have a chat transcript...

DECOY: Is this the first time you've ever done this?
STRALPH: Oh no, I'm really experienced.
DECOY: So are you, like, good at it?
STRALPH: Baby, they don't call me Spoiler cuz I'm some kind of sugardaddy...

He drives up, massive ego in tow; the decoy offers him some koolaid and excuses himself to dig up some "newly missing FBI files" on Hillary Clinton...

That's when LoZoccolo comes in...

LZ: Do you want to explain yourself?
STRALPH: They said they were progressives! Honest!
LZ: With the screenname GOPers?
STRALPH: I thought it was "Grand Old Progressives!" I had NO idea they were Republicans!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. Ha ha ha ha thanks!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. I lost ALL respect for Nader
back in 2000. He knew he wouldn't win and didn't care about drawing votes away from Gore. He just did it to satisfy his own ego.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. Ralph is little more ...
than a committed progressive who's determined to undermine our marvelous two-party system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Committed sounds about right
but I'm not sure about the rest.

What he WAS is not what he IS. If he were a committed progressive, he wouldn't take Republican money. A once great man has become a nutter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaJudy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
18. Reminds me of one of my favorite New Yorker cartoons
Here: http://www.cartoonbank.com/item/44793

Pity the print's so small on my monitor: it's totally prophetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
23. Yep, yep, sounds good lol.
Spoiler traps!

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
24. Where do I contribute? Do you take Pay Pal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
25. He took something like 97,000 votes in Florida in 2000; Bush "won" by 537
Burn this sanctimonious nut to the ground. He has the blood of hundreds of thousands of people on his hands and he needs to be reminded of it hourly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. get ready to hear from the self-deluded naderites
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #26
35. Few things more nauseating than a Virtucrat
This isn't my term, it was coined by some wag in the Bay Area at least 20 years ago, but it's a fun term: narcissistic obsessed with image that he/she can't ever stoop to pragmatism. It's also a sign of a superiority complex. These are to lefties what libertarians are to reactionaries: those who don't understand interdependence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
27. LOL, you do that!
Get yourself all worked up. Go write reams of paper, shout it from the mountaintops. And while you get your panties all in a twist, we will sit back and laugh at you, because for all of your energy and zeal, you're still getting all worked up over what, two percent of the vote, max. Ooo, big difference, big whoop, I'm sure you've got Nader trembling in his shoes:eyes:

Don't you think that all of this energy of yours could be better spent somewhere else, like perhaps changing the Democratic party to make Nader even more irrelevant than ever? Or simply working for your favorite candidate? But it is vastly amusing to see you getting all worked up over a person who is simply exercising their Constitutional right to run for office. Good job there, nice to see somebody has got the irrelevancy beat nailed down:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Why will you in particular be laughing at me?
I'm curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. Because rather than addressing the real problems in the Democratic party
You foolishly continue to tilt at the strawman of Nader, time and again. You expend all of this energy and vitriol on a candidate that has brought in what, two percent of the vote, max:eyes:

It is always amusing to watch the Nader Haters blow gaskets like this, demonizing Nader and all third party candidates, that is until the third party candidate happens to help the Dems ala Perot. The hypocrisy is amusing.

Thus do you see why I laugh? Nader does something, says something, anything, and predictably the Nader Haters go off, squawking like chickens think the world is going to end right now.

Have you ever thought that if Dems adapted a few of Nader or the Greens stances, they wouldn't have to worry about third party candidates? Naww, it's easier and more soul satifying to go squawk for awhile instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. Everybody has a job to do.
Mine is to be Chris Hansen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gelliebeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
29. Count me in for a K&R for those threads
I'll keep my peepers peeled
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainegreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
30. Nader will have a hard time making state ballots without a party supporting him. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LandOLincoln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
33. About bloody time, too.
I've hated that phony SOB for 40 years, ever since I had a long conversation with a couple of very bitter ex-Raiders at a party--but never more than when he deliberately threw the 2000 selection to Bush.

And those of you who were waxing all censorious yesterday about Al Gore's friendship with Mike Bloomberg?

One of Nader's best friends is...ta DAH...Grover Norquist.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC