Tellurian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-26-07 12:15 PM
Original message |
Clinton 32%, Obama 22%, Edwards 11%. |
|
June 26, 2006
Cook Political Report (pdf) poll
Clinton 32%, Obama 22%, Edwards 11%. Note, Hillary at 51% when combined 1st and 2nd choice are included.
June 25, 2006
Survey and Policy Institute California poll (pdf):
Clinton 37%, Obama 15%, Edwards 15%.
"With overwhelming support among women and non-white voters,New York Sen. Hillary Clinton holds a commanding lead in the California Democratic Party primary, while former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards and Illinois Sen. Barak Obama are tied in a distant second."
June 25, 2006
Clinton 37%, Obama 25%, Edwards 13%.
LINK
"For the sixth straight week, New York Senator Hillary Clinton is in the mid-30s...However, she has been at 35% or above for six of the past seven weeks... Clinton is viewed favorably by 80% of Democrats while 69% have a favorable opinion of Obama and 73% say the same about Edwards.
|
ddeclue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-26-07 12:18 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Yawn...meaningless national polls of registered as opposed to LIKELY voters mean nothing. n/t |
Tellurian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-26-07 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Why because Registered Voters prefer Clinton to Obama? |
|
Edited on Tue Jun-26-07 12:28 PM by Tellurian
:rofl:
|
ddeclue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-26-07 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Registered voters DON'T VOTE - LIKELY VOTERS VOTE.. |
|
Apparently you are another cyberspacer who doesn't work on real world elections....
Doug D.
|
Tellurian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-26-07 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. They'll vote this time, friend.. |
|
nobody wants a Republican in the WH..you can factor that in to your real world election calculations..
and quit with the lame excuses.
|
durrrty libby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-26-07 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
16. Hillary is unstoppable, That scares the wee ones |
emilyg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-26-07 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
William769
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-26-07 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
21. Somebody needs to go back to spin school. |
|
I won't say who though. I know your smart enough to figure it out, actually a monkey is smart enough to figure it out.
|
rinsd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-26-07 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
13. You work real elections? |
|
Somone who has insitnuated polls now are predicative of the GE but not the primaries?
So how many losses have you racked up?
|
Tellurian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-26-07 12:19 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Obama's negatives are rising.. |
|
Edwards favorables greater than Obamas'
High Fives!
|
Nedsdag
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-26-07 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Seeing someone else's negatives go up?
You're a sick person, Tellurian.
|
William769
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-26-07 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
Shoots the shit out of several memes that have inundated DU.
|
jsamuel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-26-07 12:42 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Hillary: Resistance is FUTILE! YAY! |
|
Edited on Tue Jun-26-07 12:42 PM by jsamuel
:sarcasm:
Your polls fail to mention that Gore was included in some and that both Obama and Hillary have lost points while Edwards has been steady or gained.
|
Nedsdag
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-26-07 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. Yes, Hillary IS the "Borg Queen." |
|
"Resistance is futile" indeed!
|
SaveElmer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-26-07 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. Better make that "President Borg Queen"... |
Nedsdag
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-26-07 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. Why bother with the presidential title. |
|
She already has the lemming vote.
|
William769
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-26-07 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
durrrty libby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-26-07 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
15. I get it. Smart women scare you. Don't worry, she will be awesome |
rinsd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-26-07 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
12. That 4 pt boost from Gore being removed puts him at 15% |
|
Beware the Edwards juggernaut!
:rofl:
|
Turbineguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-26-07 12:49 PM
Response to Original message |
10. It does not really matter who's on top |
|
When the time comes you know the republican smear machine will open the throttle wide. Since they have more on Hillary Clinton than anybody else and it does not matter whether it's the truth or not, they should be happy if she wins as it makes their job easier.
|
dmallind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-26-07 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
14. Again this Hillary is better target spiel misses one point |
|
Everything they can find on Hillary is already out there. The RW noise machine has been ghoing after her nonstop for 15 years. The general public may be easily swayed sheep but they are also easily bored sheep, and breathless repeats of travelgate, Whitewater, Rose Law etc will just be ho hum seen it before.
Of course they will look for new stuff - Fox has tried floating the Indian connections etc - but they will do that for ANY Dem candidate. The fact that HRC's skeletons have all been aired for 15 years is more likely to be a help than a hindrance as it will bore the American Idol crowd. Her negatives are indeed high, but there's limited to no way to get them higher. Same cannot be said for any other candidate (gore would be a second perhaps but he's been ignored by Scaife et al for the last few years while Hillary has remained in the crosshairs)
|
Turbineguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-26-07 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
silverojo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-26-07 01:46 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Could you lay off the bold type a little? It's only supposed to enhance certain words and phrases. Everything in bold is like everything in all caps--it looks like screaming, and it's hard on the eyes.
Thanks! :)
|
Tellurian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-26-07 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
I couldn't decide..????
Bold the %%? no, Bold the commentary? no, Bold the date?
ok, I think the date is least important..I'll try to remember for tomorrow, thanks-
|
churchofreality
(545 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-26-07 02:45 PM
Response to Original message |
20. I apologize to all Obama and Edwards people but.... |
|
She is gonna kick your candidates ass!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 14th 2024, 04:49 PM
Response to Original message |