Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

George Will says "Dialectic of censorship is all too predictable"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LordJFT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 04:46 PM
Original message
George Will says "Dialectic of censorship is all too predictable"
Ok so in the first part of this article I actually agreed with him for once. He was criticizing the city of Oklahoma for taking down fliers advertising "a forum for people of faith to express their views on the comtemporary issues of the day. With respect for the natural family, marriage and family values" calling it "homophobic" and disruptive after they had allowed and advertisement called "Happy Coming Out Day." I've always been a strong supporter of free speech. Furthermore I don't find the words to be offensive. In fact, as a supporter of gay rights, if I lived in Oklahoma I might be inclined to go to this seminar and talk about how homosexual relationships occur naturally, how homosexual behavior has been discovered in animals, how I'm such a supporter of marriage that I want it to be expanded to more people and how I consider tolerance and equality to be family values. So Will's first point I totally agree with him. But then he he makes a huge incomprehensible leap and says,"Congress is trying to enact another 'hate crime' law that would authorize ehanced punishments for crimes committed because of, among other things, sexual orientation." He then goes on to say that people have united against it out of fear that it will be used to put a "muzzle" on the church. How the hell could the hate crime law be used to put a muzzle on the church unless the church plans on committing any crimes against homosexuals? The law doesn't create any new crimes, it just, as Will himself stated "enhances punishments for crimes committed because of sexual orientation." So unless anyone was already planning on doing something illegal it couldn't possibly be used as a muzzle. It infuriates me when conservatives make reasonable, rational arguments and then try to somehow connect those arguments to completely absurd claims. I couldn't find this article on line (I think you have to be registered to get it from the Washington Post site) but if someone is able to find it and post it i would be greatly appreciative, i think it was in yesterday's paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Punctuation and carriage returns are your friends
Edited on Tue Jun-26-07 04:50 PM by TechBear_Seattle
Also, a link would be nice.

Welcome to DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC