House Grudgingly Accepts a Pay Raise, as Usualhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/27/AR2007062702790.html?referrer=email&referrer=email&referrer=email&referrer=emailDemocrats have for weeks been privately wringing their hands over whether to accept an automatic 2.5 percent pay increase, fretting that the raise may appear inconsistent with their campaign promises.
But last night, the House made its peace with it, rejecting a bid to block the automatic cost-of-living raise of about $4,400 on a 244 to 181 vote.
After engineering a minimum-wage increase, Majority Leader Steny Hoyer reportedly endorsed the pay raise. (Nikki Kahn - The Washington Post)
(snip)
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, with Emanuel at the helm last year, ran ads attacking Republicans for accepting automatic pay increases while voting against a minimum-wage increase -- a move that infuriated the GOP. "There has been an unspoken agreement between the parties that the leadership could bring the pay raise up and allow people to vote their conscience, but the members would not use it as a campaign issue," said one GOP aide, adding that Republicans are still mighty angry.
The cost-of-living increases for Congress are automatic by permanent law, and have for years been in the fine print of an appropriations bill, which also gives civil servants a COLA increase. Having the measure lumped with other legislation insulates the members from specifically voting on a raise just for themselves.
Members must actively vote to block the raise to stop it. As he has in the past, Democrat Jim Matheson of Utah moved to hold a direct vote to block the increase -- and his motion was defeated by a majority of both parties, as it has been in the past. The vote ends up being the only public record for members on the issue.
So by voting against Matheson's proposal last night, the House gave itself a pay raise.
"If you and I sat down and read the bill, we probably couldn't even find the language that authorizes the raises," said Matheson, who also gives his increase to charity. "I think it is important that we have an up-or-down vote just on the raise -- that what we do is transparent. It shouldn't be buried in an appropriations bill."
The issue was so touchy for Democrats that all staff was kicked out of a recent leadership meeting where it was discussed, sources say.
(more)