|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
bigdarryl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 02:03 PM Original message |
This Thompson is a ASS but what does his wife have to do with him running and being President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
1. Because she's a younger trophy wife -- and she's the least of his problems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigdarryl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 02:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. thats a bullshit excuse so does that mean all the other candidates wifes should be open to scrutiny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 02:14 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Uh, they are. Which wives are not scrutinized? Have you not - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 02:30 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. I don't want Fred in there because he's a fascist pig -- I was speaking of public perception |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
2. It's the way it is and always has been. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 02:21 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. I'll raise you one, and take you back to the early days of the Republic ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
clydefrand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
4. Good fodder for the late night shows, don't you think? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
8. So edwards big haircuts and the rest of the crap isn't? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 07:08 PM Response to Original message |
9. Four words: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maximusveritas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-07-07 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
10. Luntz pulling stats out of his ass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:37 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC