Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

One of the WORST consequences of Clinton's impeachment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rhiannon55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 12:58 PM
Original message
One of the WORST consequences of Clinton's impeachment
is that it cheapened the very idea of impeachment and has made impeachment seem like a political trick rather than a remedy for HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS. Will * have to kill someone with his bare hands and eat the entrails on the south lawn of the WH before impeachment will be put back on the table?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hey, Dick shot someone in the face
and nothing happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Heh-heh. You said "Dick." And "face."
I'm sure that if VP Gore had blasted a friend in the face, the press would have been just as deferential to him re: his failure to report it to the police in a timely manner, etc...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nope. We just have to re-re-educate people and our reps.
Visualize it. And...

Never Give Up.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhiannon55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. Maybe implementing this idea would help us (and Americans, in general) visualize it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's the way the GOP used it - as political revenge against Clinton
for the high crime of beating their guy twice in a fair & free election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. He would have to kill a White person, because it seems congress
is not so interested in the fact that nearly ONE MILLION Iraqis have died in Bush's genocidal war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Newt's famous quote: "We did it because we COULD."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. Pretty much, yes.
I'm sad to say it, but re: your second sentence, pretty much, yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. This might do the trick...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Exactly, they need to X Cheney...
that would solve most of our problems, at least the most insidious ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. LOL. I was talking about the video at the link I posted, but that works too.
Edited on Tue Jul-10-07 01:26 PM by cui bono
I ran across the pic while sorting files on my computer and felt it was even more appropriate than the impeach bush pic I had there before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm convinced they did it to DISGRACE THE PROCESS
because, as we know, Clinton was a fiscal conservative who had handed them many of the things they wanted, from NAFTA and GATT through the horror of a welfare reform bill. Obviously, they weren't trying to rid themselves of an ally.

I think they knew exactly what they were doing when they tried to impeach him over such a tissue of lies. Yes, it was an obvious political witch hunt and yes, it should never have been allowed to proceed.

However, it has provided excellent cover for the treasonous bastards in control now. Because the process of impeachment, itself, got such a bad rap, Congress is loath to repeat it.

It was their plan all along, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhiannon55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. In a roundabout way, this is another example
of republicans "framing" the debate, e.g., WE used impeachment for bullshit political reasons, so of course, Democrats MUST want to do it for bullshit political reasons as well.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. I seriously think they Republicans did that on purpose.
Edited on Tue Jul-10-07 01:14 PM by Totally Committed
They found the most non-senseical thing to impeach a President on, and they beat us over the head with it for two years, rendering the next half-dozen Presidents (which they planned on being all Republicans) Impeachment-proof.

They counted on it taking at least that long for America to get the bad taste out of their mouths.

That having been said.... The next Democratic POTUS will not be given this sort of "off-the-table" treatment, no matter how soon he or she is elected. Trust me.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. In that case, maybe a Hillary Clinton win would be a good thing..
what could they possibly dredge up on her that hasn't already been spun a gazillion times before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Hm... I wonder what they will try on the next Dem president?
At that point I think they will be so desperate I shudder to think what they'll do.

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. I can't go there, with all due respect....
The thought of her as our nominee and/or our POTUS is a thought too black to bear.

We need a TRUE Left-Wing Liberal/Progressive in '08, or this won't be the Democratic Party I grew up wanting it to be any longer.

TC


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhiannon55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. "...the Democratic Party I grew up wanting it to be..."
Sigh. Kind of like "the America I grew up wanting it to be..."

Sometimes our ideals out-pace reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Isn't that the truth?
I grew up thinking that all I had to do was work hard for the Dems, give as much as I could, and everything they told me would come to pass.

Here we are 45+ yrs. later and there is still no racial or sexual equality. Marriage is still only okay between a man and a woman. Children are still not educated, nurtured, and wanted equally. We are still at war. Choice is disappearing, along with the seperation of Church and State. The gulf between the rich and the poor is widening. We are building walls and digging ditches at our southern border.

As if that were not enough, I still have awful dreams about Katrina, and those poor, desperate people.

And, is this Party going compassionately and humanistically to the Left in response? NO. It is triangulating to the Right to please the corporations and appease the Republicans.

This really isn't the Party I thought it would be.

TC


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. We certainly are not where we should be..
in terms of equality, but to say that things are no different than they were 45 years ago is simply incorrect in my opinion. We've made strides, however slowly. The Reagan years definitely set us back in terms of race relations, and the Roberts court is certainly looking like it will be troubling to say the least.

Katrina can't be pinned fairly on the Democratic party, that falls squarely in the putrid lap of George W. Bush and his sycophants in Congress, but the Democrats need to make sure that it doesn't happen again, and that we can somehow begin to make things right again in New Orleans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Unfortunately, a true left wing/progressive can't win the POTUS..
not next year anyway. Look how they eviscerated Howard Dean.

Hell there are places right her in my state where a good number of people wouldn't vote for Hillary because she's a woman, or Obama because he's black. We can keep dreaming though. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. That's exactly right....
impeaching Clinton was revenge for impeaching Nixon, so now impeaching Bushy II will look like revenge for impeaching Clinton, and so on and so on....It just becomes ever more clear what a filthy piece of crap Newt Gingrich really was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. Hyde said it was payback,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
19. Kick and Rec n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
25. Pretty much
and exactly.

I started a thread yesterday wondering something similar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC