Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is anyone watching the Senate floor now?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 02:24 PM
Original message
Is anyone watching the Senate floor now?
Iran, Iran, Iran is in every sentence being spoken. The Repugs have taken over the discussion supporting the Lieberman amendment. Linsey Graham speaking now. Snowe is onboard with her support too. (They don't change their spots - so don't trust any of them.)

Where is Reid? Whimping out somewhere in the cloakroom? The Webb amendment to limit the duty time for the troops was defeated but Lieberman's is going to pass? What is going on here?

The Senate is setting the stage for an invasion into another country - IRAN? Are we going to let this happen again?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, they are beginning their go after Iran spin.
It's been non-stop now for the last 20 minutes with McCain and Graham and I should add in their identical color coordinated outfits today. Losers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. the republicans get equal time to spout off their insanity
does`t matter what they have to say because they are in the minority. i`m not sure what they think we can do to iran. russia,china,and others in our trading partership would be throughly pissed if we disrupted the gas and oil out of iran. our economy would collapse and take years to recover
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Coming up Hagel gets two hours.
Should be interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. AAAkK Turned it on & lierberman is whining on my screen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muffin1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Heard Joe Liermann
Talking that same shit to Wolf Blunder yesterday. Of course, Wolfie just ate it up...didn't really question him at all.:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Two HOURS? Jesus, how could he have THAT much to say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. The democrats are joining them - Levin and Durbin just now.
Like sheeps being led to the slaughter. We need to end this war not expand it into another country.

Lieberman just mentioning "use of force" against Iran trying to soft peddle it but an idiot would get the gist of what he means.

I looked on the Senate site but cannot find a copy of the Lieberman amendment to find out what exactly it says.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Wasn't Lieberman just perfect.(sarcasm) Hell, it was a vote for war
Edited on Wed Jul-11-07 02:47 PM by lyonn
speech. Sounded like the IWR. Has everone lost their mind? They act like they have the never ending military............

Edit: and the absolute right to invade any country they feel threatens us. My head is spinning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Just turned it on in time to watch Lindsay Graham, Fantacy land speaking
He is up there spouting what will happen if we leave. The whole middle east will be winners and we will be loosers. It was pure doom, gloom and terror. I have low blood pressure but, lordy, palpitations have set in. The Insanity of all this Lieberman and Graham terror talk has me Livid.

Well, I have a solution. According to Linsay we need to stay the course in Iraq until it is a stable country and all the ME will also become peaceful, like Libya is now!

OK, if it is critical that we stay for years or decades in Iraq to make that safe, secure and democratic then let's institute a draft so that every American can participate in this hugh project.

Since the repubs don't want to give our troops a decent internal between combat duty it is apparent that we need Many More Troops. They need to put up or shut up.

There is no way our present military can continue at the pace they put through now. Damn Them!!!

Our troops are not laundry, wash, rinse and set out to dry and then when they get dirty repeat the procedure.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. It becomes patently obvious why the Webb amendment was defeated.
The troops will get no rest when the invasion of Iran begins (if they get their way.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Oh leave Reid alone.
Where would you have him be? Standing in front of the camera shouting "shut up shut up shut up" at the Repubs during the debate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. At the moment I am not trashing the Dems on the floor, with a few
exceptions. The repubs have their alloted time to speak. It is what they are saying that is shocking. At the rate the repubs are going we should have a clean sweep in the next election. But, they have their right to demand 60 votes to pass anything and that's the law. What can we do but perform like Webb, Boxer and other did yesterday and keep hammering away and making them explain themselves. And boy are they explaining.

Since I tuned in late don't know what the Levin amendment is. Sorry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. This is on the screen on C-Span 2:
Lieberman (I-CT) Amendment


Requires report by US government detailing Iran's part in equipping and funding terrorists in Iraq.


:wtf:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Thanks, just now noticed
Edited on Wed Jul-11-07 03:16 PM by lyonn
Iran is a problem but it seems so obvious why Lieberman wants the subject front and center, he has wanted Iraq and Iran blown off the map for years.

The word that keeps going through my mind as I am watching this is "Insane". The opposite is sorta like rational thinking, or intelligent, or giving thought to something. The repubs have totally lost me with their logic.

It's like if we don't know how to negotiate with another country we just bomb them... This stuff couldn't be made up for a high suspense movie. Who would even believe it?

Edit: Right, let's get a report on Iran. We can't even get one on Iraq. If we do it's full of crap (bs).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. and McCain is more and more off the deep end...
if the Reps are pressuring Bush to set a deadline to get out of Iraq, why in heall would they be talking about Iran?


Are they suggesting that we get the troops out of Iraq and then send them right over to Iran?


They are beyond belief. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. they won't give troops a rest
from war.....our troops are worn out......perhaps they should get fresh bodies by installing the draft?.how else are we suppose to fight 3 wars?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 04:08 PM
Original message
just when you think their irrationality can go no further, it does
It's incomprehensible... the voice of reason seems to be silent...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. just when you think their irrationality can go no further, it does
It's incomprehensible... the voice of reason seems to be silent...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
16. Do you consider Feingold a wimp too?
Before you smear Sen. Reid, listen to what Russ had to say about him just a few short weeks ago:

http://www.wispolitics.com/1006/070629_Feingold.mp3

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nealmhughes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
18. Yes, the usual suspects: Lieberman, Kyl, McCain and Graham.
Evidently, Iran is responsible for the drought in the SE and the high temps. in the West, are hand in glove with al Qaeda, the Taliban and probably the KKK and Global Warming Advocates, since these men of virtue have accused Iran of being behind everything but the JonBenet Ramsey murder and stashing the body of the girl on Aruba.

What a convenient memory we in the US have! Iran trains paramilitary for extralegal activity. Wow, you mean like the Bay of Pigs or the Eliot Abrams/Roberto D'Aubusson unholy alliance in El Salvador? You mean like the US training the Shah's SAVAK and arming Iraq during the Iraq-Iran War?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Iran is also responsible for the
Edited on Wed Jul-11-07 03:40 PM by trashcanistanista
wildfires in California, and 43 million Americans without health insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muffin1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. duh
obviously...bombing begins tomorrow...
Hey, I've been depressed lately...can I blame Iran for that?:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
44. ......yeah and they told China to send us shitty tooth paste, I bet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Oh gawd nealmhughes, I needed that, tooo funny. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
22. My Senator (Hagel) on now...
reporting on Nebraska Guard soldiers just coming back from 18-MONTH DEPLOYMENT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
23. Hagel is on now and is laying it out there
How our military is stretch and tired, etc., with quotes from Generals backing his up. This is well worth listening to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. He did well--proud of him. Always just puts it out there without wasting words.
Webb up now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Two intelligent people at once. How refreshing.
Restores some of my faith in govt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Yep--two old vets (and old friends) backing each other up, even
though they're on opposite sides of the aisle--nice to see. So sad their amendment got shot down today--I am very pissed about it. Hopefully the new amendment (Hagel-Levin) that they are discussing will come closer to passing--sounds like it covers some of the same territory RE troop deployment length.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. The first bill on the troop deployment time was a sure thing, I thought??
How could they vote that down? Now this one to make deployment time and home time equal will probably be voted down. What is wrong with these people. It will interesting to hear what the repubs have to say against this amendment. Lieberman will probably be the first one up to hack on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spearman87 Donating Member (252 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
29. Bombing. Not invasion, bombing. Setting the stage for
Edited on Wed Jul-11-07 04:47 PM by Spearman87
an invasion is pointless without the troops to do it. And we don't have them. But don't be shocked if we attack some supposed terrorist training camps or IED-related equipment stocks.

Or even heaven-forbid, an all-out bombing of Iran's nuclear program related facilities. But I don't think we are stupid enough to go that far......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
30. Kyl up, arguing against upcoming Hagel amendment--saying that
Edited on Wed Jul-11-07 04:48 PM by wienerdoggie
members of Congress can't "dictate" or micromanage deployment schedule. Hagel has said that the reason this is necessary is because we are fighting two lengthy wars with an all-volunteer force--has never been done before, need some new guidelines to keep from wrecking force structure. Kyl says Hagel amendment is "throwing down gauntlet" at Bush's feet, Senate telling him how to run war. Kyl is a grade-A ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
31. Lady Lindsey arguing for his amendment now, counterpart to Hagel-Levin and Webb amendments--
This war is unpopular--he's blathering on--no visionary politics in Congress. Blah blah--micromanging, unconstitutional to impede President in deploying troops, just because polls show war in unpopular. His amendment says same thing almost as Hagel's but is OK because it's a suggestion, not mandate. Now he's off on tangent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
32. Things have gone to Hell on the Senate floor - Inhofe speaking
How could Oklahomans do this to our country? We can't seem to vote that jerk out. I have tried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
33. Inhofe--Bush inherited military personnel crisis from Clinton.
Fucking liar, actually has a chart--it's all Clinton's fault that our military is broken--he tore down the military, now we're paying for it. Petraeus is God, everything's working in Iraq--blah blah, we are WINNING, it's a dramatic change over there! Still going on about the 90's and military cuts from Clinton, but Bush is helping build military back up--help is on the way! Jesus, he's totally scattershot--what the fuck is his POINT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Inhofe has got to be terribly jelous of Clinton, he can't get over him!
Like a spurned lover thingy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
34. Webb--no constitutional issues in Hagel amendment--perfectly appropriate--
Congress placed restrictions on Truman when troops sent in harm's way without training, so there is precedent. Amendment will not carry on to other wars--is only applicable to Iraq, won't affect future wars. Graham amendment only for political cover, only a sense of Congress, and basically asserts CURRENT/EXISTNG policy--why vote for it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
36. Hagel--points to Constitution--what is role of Congress in war--
Congress can make rules regarding land/sea wars, quoting Constitution. Hagel PISSED!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
37. Calling roll--will vote on Hagel and Graham amendments...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Seems like you and me are the only ones getting into this hearing
today. This is the most action and varied testimony about the war that we have seen in a long time. We really get to hear how they are thinking - or not thinking.

Wonder if there are any other opinion post of this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Don't know--but looks like it will be a party-line vote--even Coleman voted no.
Oh well. Guess they're all going to vote for the meaningless Graham amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Did I hear that Cole voted yes?
Since I don't watch constantly I sometimes hear things wrong, but that would be nice if I heard correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. I may have missed it--can't tell you. This won't be as close as the Webb amendment--
defeated--52-45, withdrawn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Expletives!! Swell bunch
Would they have voted that way had 20 or so active military that had done double duty in Iraq been in the audience?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Nope-- bunch of assholes--watch them all vote for the Graham "political cover"
amendment though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. Hey, hey, this one may go Down. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. Yep, I'm on it on GD thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
47. This vote was more important than the amend. to get report on Iran
This seemed to be a sneaky way to make new rules without really looking like that was happening. Kinda like the abortion issues that go before the Supreme Court where they are slowing working their way towards abolishing abortions.

The idea of not allowing two consecutive "15" month tours is not doing the troops any favors. One 15 month tour is too long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC