Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm willing to give Pelosi the benefit of the doubt

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 05:40 PM
Original message
I'm willing to give Pelosi the benefit of the doubt
in terms of her being a skilled politician.

But no matter how skilled she is, the dems are working in the Congress with thin (or non-existent) margins.
Even if the dems win the White House in 2008, unless the voting margin increases not much will be able to get done because unlike the GOP the dems don't vote en bloc.

Her symbolic votes provide ammunition for dems to overturn GOP seats.
Forcing the GOP to back the President even after the country has awoken from its stupor and realized what a disaster he is, will pay off in the next election.

If you imagined anything other than this type of situation when the House and Senate were barely won, you weren't being realistic to begin with.

Did you imagine that the GOP'ers in the Congress would suddenly have a change of heart?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent insight. Thanks.
NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Did any of us stop to think
since Pelosi is closer to the house (and senate) that she might know that we couldn't even get an impeachment off the ground. That maybe she is trying to get enough on board to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. People in Congress don't strike me as being into taking actions
they know they can't win.

They're not into noble but futile gestures.

You don't want to make that leap and the end up with LESS than you had before in terms of what you're able to accomplish.

For some reason people thought that if we squeaked the Dems in there that they'd work some sort of miracles. We need to give them more of a majority. But people also need to remember that even with a majority Tip O'Neil wasn't able to go crazy with the agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Also useful to remember the MODERATE Repubs got swept out in 06 - Chaffee, Leach etc
Leaving the batshit crazies who are still covering for Bush and voting against real change. The ones that got booted out were the ones that were likely to vote w Dems now and again. The ones that are left? Fanatical Bush-nuts

It is really a matter of math, and a lot of DU'ers don't seem to get it -- The margin in the Senate is 1 vote, and that includes LIE-BERMAN.

You are right -- Dems need to keep pushing legislation and make the Repugs put thier insane support of Bush on the record. Hopefully a few will wake up at some point and start voting the right way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Absolutely, they have to vote on every dream
piece of legislation the public is looking for.

Make the GOP defend itself in the next election after voting against troop rest, college tuition, healthcare, education, oversight, envirnomental protection, and union interests.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm not gung ho on impeachment, but I'm not so sure about her political skills
There are multiple things that she could have done besides give everything he wanted in that supplemental appropriations bill. Like put in totally un-related items that he wouldn't otherwise like (minimum wage, environmental standards, etc.) that he would otherwise never sign. And instead of funding the war for four months, fund it for one month at a time so that he will have to accept more of these things.

IMO, when we have a Democrat in the White House, I think she'll do a good job of managing the House and getting the President's agenda passed. But as the leader of our party, I am not impressed with her thus far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. you dont know about her political skills?
tell me, how many other women speaker of the houses have there been in the US?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Ascending to power and using it properly are two entirely different things
Nobody can deny that Pelosi has done the first very well. But as far as doing battle with the executive branch, I'm not impressed. Again, I think she'll do a good job herding cats when we have a Democratic President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. She ain't perfect to be sure
She has a bit of Bush in her in the form of cronyism and rewarding loyalty. I also suspect she's quite stubborn.

But she is also a good woman whom I've heard give good statements regarding issues like Gitmo in the past. She's said things I was thinking, which I appreciated. And she was willing to buck tradition to give Murtha a chance at Majority Leader. I like her, and don't think she deserves the devil horns some would put on her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Bone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. But when there's an groundswell of public support
from their constituency.....failing to file articles of impeachment would be a great folly.

public opinion polls already show enough support to impeach V.P. Cheney...and Bush's #'s don't look too good either.

http://americanresearchgroup.com/

When these #'s begin to change more in favor of impeachment, Democrats must embrace the idea..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'm willing to give her until 23 July. Then, I just want to know where to
send money to Cindy. Right now, I've stopped giving to the Dems until impeachment is on the table. After the 23rd, I know where to send my contributions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC