Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Staying course poses huge risk for Republicans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 09:02 AM
Original message
Staying course poses huge risk for Republicans

Staying course poses huge risk for Republicans

Carolyn Lochhead, Chronicle Washington Bureau

Friday, July 13, 2007

(07-13) 04:00 PDT Washington -- Facing rock-bottom poll numbers and the judgment of history, President Bush has little to lose politically in using the last 18 months of his presidency to try to prove critics of his war policy wrong. The president followed that path Thursday, finding promise in a "young democracy" in Iraq despite descriptions by his own administration of a deeply fractured society.

<...>

Democrats have expressed rising outrage and astonishment at what they call Bush's refusal to face reality and have said the only thing likely to change between now and mid-September is that more American troops will die in a war that is in its fifth year.

"The president has his head in the sand," said Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif. "The Iraqis have not met a single of the 18 benchmarks we laid out, and yet this president has the audacity to ask for more patience while our troops are getting killed every day policing a civil war."

Democratic Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, defeated by Bush in 2004, said the Iraqi government has shown no indication it can unify the country.

"No general, no administration official has come to us ... in our secret briefings and said this is a winning strategy," Kerry said. "What we have is a hope, a wing and a prayer that somehow these Iraqis are going to come together and make some decisions."

Republicans have so far largely stuck with Bush on major votes and many defend the war despite its cost of more than 3,600 American lives and $500 billion. Democrats remain four votes short of the 60 senators needed to break the procedural hurdles in the Senate and gain approval of legislation setting dates to withdraw American forces from Iraq.

more


House OKs Iraq pullout

But vote to leave isn't veto-proof

Renee Schoof and Margaret Talev
McClatchy
July 13, 2007

WASHINGTON – Hours after President Bush appealed for more time for his Iraq plan to work, the House of Representatives voted 223-201 Thursday for a dramatic change of course – a troop withdrawal to start in four months and a shift in the mission by next year mainly to fight against international terrorists.

Both the House vote and a similar one planned in the Senate next week add pressure on Republicans facing widespread frustration with the war. Most Republicans say they won't vote to force Bush to withdraw troops on a timetable and that they'll wait for a mid-September report to decide whether to change course.

House Democrats said that with casualties in Iraq high and worldwide terrorism threats growing, there was no reason to hold back, and they pressured Republicans to reject the president's strategy now. They were 67 votes short of the two-thirds majority necessary to override a presidential veto, however.

<...>

"The report in September, I guarantee my colleagues, will reflect exactly what we see today. The civil war will be raging on. There will be no real political progress," Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., said in a speech in the Senate.

"Each member really has to ask themselves in these next days, what is our responsibility to our soldiers and to our country? We hear people in cloakrooms privately saying it's wrong. But it doesn't translate into votes. How are you going to feel in September if you finally wind up saying, 'Well I think the policy is broken now?' "

more


John Kerry: New Iraq Policy Can’t Wait Until September
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rydz777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Policing a civil war." Well said, Sen. Boxer. That's exactly what
is going on, and when anyone pauses to reflect on what "policing a civil war" means in all its implications, it is evident that it is an insane mission that Bush has committed our troops to.

Yet, it is clear that Bush fully intends to drag this out and dump it into the lap of his successor. For the sake of the country and for the sake of the next Democratic President, the Democratic Congress needs to act now - urgently - to cut off the funding of this disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bravo Zulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. "circling the wagons"


Regarding the despairing and spineless Republican Senators (plus turncoat Lieberman), the pic -- straight out of the survivalist handbook -- speaks of "circling the wagons."
At the Senate Thursday to monitor Iraq were, from left, Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina; Joseph I. Lieberman, Independent of Connecticut; and three other Republicans, Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas, Trent Lott of Mississippi and Christopher Bond of Missouri.


http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/la-na-bush13jul13,1,7980796.story?coll=la-headlines-frontpage&track=crosspromo

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC