Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary Clinton: Why is She Hated by Progressives and Right-Wingers Alike?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 09:06 PM
Original message
Hillary Clinton: Why is She Hated by Progressives and Right-Wingers Alike?
Published on Sunday, July 15, 2007 by the Independent/UK

Hillary Clinton: Why is She Hated by Progressives and Right-Wingers Alike?

America’s anti-Hillary Clinton alliance is growing by the day

by Leonard Doyle


WASHINGTON — There is something about Hillary that raises the blood pressure of otherwise easy-going Americans - and they don’t need to be Republicans. At a 4th of July barbecue, with the band working its way through the “Battle Hymn of the Republic”, I made the mistake of asking a pleasant young woman what she thought of Hillary’s chances. Red white and blue fireworks were going off over Capitol Hill, as she morphed into the sort of person who goes on the Jerry Springer Show. She would “never, ever” vote for America’s most famous politician, she said. More than 50 per cent of Americans agree with her.

With everyone on tenterhooks over terrorism and the looming defeat in Iraq, there is a febrile atmosphere in the US. Many are taking their anger out on Hillary as she attempts to break through the last remaining glass ceiling. Something called the “Hillary Conundrum” has emerged to cause deep unease inside her party while giving comfort to the Republican party, which by now should be in disarray.

The most seasoned political honchos are uneasy about the candidate who looks like a shoo-in as next year’s Democratic nominee for the presidential elections. Hillary has the war chest, a formidable political machine and she is riding highest in the opinion polls.

She is probably the most competent in the field. Virtually everyone agrees that she should have the best chance of wresting the presidency from the Republicans in 2008 and repairing the damage from the wrecking ball (omega) of the Bush presidency. She also has Bill Clinton by her side, a formidable campaigner who took to the road for the first time in Iowa this month.

But behind the scenes, Americans are deeply worried at the prospect of having Hillary (and Bill) back in the White House. While she inspires ordinary women voters, men are not so moved and she has the highest voter-disapproval ratings of any top-tier candidate in the race. She also has a big problem with left-wing feminists.

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/07/15/2545/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. i don't hate her.....but I don't hate hardly anyone nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because she hopes to be "a uniter, not a divider" too? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Because she tries to appeal to everyone..
... and hence appeals to almost no one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Who was she appealing to when she refused to apologize for her IWR vote and who was she appealing to
when she has stated that if people disagree with her , don't vote for her.......said the same thing during B Clinton's run for the presidency, except then it was about their marital issues?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #15
57. Her..
... Iraq war position has moved with public opinion like every important position she takes. She's just 6 months behind the power curve, that's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Few people can provide a serious answer.
Edited on Sun Jul-15-07 09:20 PM by jmp
People hate her for any number of silly reasons. The Clintons inspire loons like nothing this side of UFOs and Elvis.











Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. i do not like hillary
she has nothing in common with me. edwards has actually worked in a no collar job and obama is kind`a like my buddy in high school who figured color don`t mean shit when neither has much. young republicans have never had anything in common with me or the people i grew up with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. I am a woman who is not inspired by her. I am so sick of the clintons in general.
and I have a real problem with third terms. I have other reasons but, will not voice that here and now.
But, I wish the Clintons would exit graceful like others rather than hang around, want to relive yesterday and act like a guest who never leaves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Winning is not ...
"hanging around".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gelliebeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
76. I agree with you completely
I don't like the idea of a dynasty, Bush, Clinton, Bush, and Clinton.
There is a huge factor of the voting public that will never support the Clintons. Even if she won the primary there are still millions that will be inspired to vote against her. The other Democratic candidates don't have that particular negative factor looming over their heads. When I saw that poll out there that said that 52% would vote against her is something everyone should look at and consider. I don't want another 4 years of repuke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. I don't hate her. I just don't want her to be the candidate.
Yes, I will vote for her, but I won't work for her. She just does not inspire me. That's what is missing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. Clinton Fatigue 2.0
I thought it was over in the 90's and officially over when Gore ran without Mr. Smilin' NAFTA... we need a friggin' re-run of this crap?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. here's some of that "crap"
A NATION TRANSFORMED

Clinton-Gore Administration Accomplishments: 1993 - 2000

For the past seven and a half years, President Clinton and Vice President Gore have been guided by three core values: building a community of all Americans; creating opportunity for all Americans; and demanding responsibility from all Americans. Pursuing policies based on these values has resulted in tremendous progress for our nation, and a strong America at the dawn of the 21st Century. The President and Vice President are committed to a "New Opportunity Agenda" to build on our progress and expand our prosperity until it reaches every corner of the nation.

Economy: the Strongest Economy in a Generation

Longest Economic Expansion in U.S. History. In February 2000, the United States entered the 107th consecutive month of economic expansion -- the longest economic expansion in history.

Moving From Record Deficits to Record Surplus. In 1992, the Federal budget deficit was $290 billion - the largest dollar deficit in American history. In January 1993, the Congressional Budget Office projected that the deficit would grow to $455 billion by 2000. The Office of Management and Budget is now projecting a surplus of at least $230 billion for 2000 - the third consecutive surplus and the largest surplus ever, even after adjusting for inflation. Compared with original projections, that is over $685 billion less in government drain on the economy and over $685 billion more potentially available for private investment in this one year alone. The 2000 surplus is projected to be 2.4 percent of GDP -- the largest surplus as a share of GDP since 1948. This is the first time we have had three surpluses in a row in more than a half century, and it is the second consecutive surplus excluding Social Security.

Paying Off the National Debt. In July 2000, the Treasury Department announced that the United States will pay off $221 billion of debt this year -- the largest one-year debt pay down in American history. This will be the third consecutive year of debt reduction, bringing the three-year total to $360 billion. Public debt is on track to be $2.4 trillion lower in 2000 than was projected in 1993. Debt reduction brings real benefits for the American people -- a family with a home mortgage of $100,000 might expect to save roughly $2,000 per year in mortgage payments. Reduced debt also means lower interest rates and reduced payments on car loans and student loans. With the President's plan, we are now on track to eliminate the nation's publicly held debt by at least 2012.

More Than 22 Million New Jobs. 22.2 million new jobs have been created since 1993, the most jobs ever created under a single Administration -- and more new jobs than Presidents Reagan and Bush created during their three terms. 92 percent (20 million) of the new jobs have been created in the private sector, the highest percentage in 50 years. Under President Clinton and Vice President Gore, the economy has added an average of 248,000 jobs per month, the highest under any President. This compares to 52,000 per month under President Bush and 167,000 per month under President Reagan.

Fastest and Longest Real Wage Growth in Over Three Decades. In the last 12 months, average hourly earnings have increased 3.8 percent -- faster than the rate of inflation. The United States has had five consecutive years of real wage growth -- the longest consecutive increase since the 1960s. Since 1993, real wages are up 6.5 percent, after declining 4.3 percent during the Reagan and Bush years.

Household Income Breaks $40,000 for First Time in History. Income for median households rose $1,072, or 2.7 percent, from $39,744 in 1998 to $40,816, marking an unprecedented fifth year of significant growth in income. In 1999, the median income of African American households increased from $25,911 in 1998 to $27,910 -- an increase of $1,999, or 7.7 percent, which is the largest one-year increase ever recorded. The income of the median Hispanic household, adjusted for inflation, increased from $28,956 in 1998 to $30,735 in 1999 -- an increase of $1,779, or 6.1 percent, which is the largest one-year increase ever recorded.

Unemployment is the Lowest in Over Three Decades. Unemployment is down from 7.5 percent in 1992 to 3.9 percent in September, the lowest in more than three decades. The unemployment rate has fallen for seven years in a row, and has remained below 5 percent for 37 months in a row -- over three full years. Unemployment for African-Americans fell to the lowest level ever recorded, and for Hispanics it remains at historic lows.


Highest Homeownership Rate in History. The homeownership rate reached 67.2 percent in the second quarter of 2000 -- the highest ever recorded. Minority homeownership rates were also the highest ever recorded. In contrast, the homeownership rate fell from 65.6 percent in the first quarter of 1981 to 63.7 percent in the first quarter of 1993. There are almost 9 million more homeowners than in 1993.

Lowest Poverty Rate Since 1979. In 1999, the poverty rate dropped from 12.7 percent to 11.8 percent, the lowest rate in two decades. Since President Clinton and Vice President Gore passed their Economic Plan in 1993, the poverty rate has declined from 15.1 percent in 1993 to 11.8 percent in 1999 - the largest six-year drop in poverty in nearly 30 years (1964-1970). There are now 7 million fewer people in poverty than in 1993, and over 2.2 million, or over 30 percent, of this decline occurred during the past year.

Largest One-Year Drop in Child Poverty in More than Three Decades. Under President Clinton and Vice President Gore child poverty has dropped by 25.6 percent -- from 22.7 percent in 1993 to 16.9 percent in 1999. While this is still too high, it is the lowest child poverty rate since 1979 and includes the largest one-year decline since 1966, which occurred from 1998 to 1999. The African American child poverty rate has fallen 28.2 percent since 1993, and dropped from 36.7 percent in 1998 to 33.1 percent in 1999 -- the largest one-year drop in history and the lowest level on record (data collected since 1959). The Hispanic child poverty rate has fallen by 26 percent since 1993, and dropped from 25.6 percent in 1998 to 22.8 percent in 1999 -- the lowest level since 1979.

Families and Communities: Strengthening America's Working Families

Tax Cuts for Working Families. 15 million additional working families received additional tax relief because of the President's expansion of the Earned Income Tax Credit. In 1999, the EITC lifted 4.1 million people out of poverty - nearly double the number lifted out of poverty by the EITC in 1993. This year, the President proposed expanding the EITC to provide tax relief to an additional 6.8 million hard-pressed working families.

Helping Parents Balance Work and Family. The Family and Medical Leave Act allows workers to take up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave to care for seriously ill family members, new born or adoptive children, or their own serious health problems without fear of losing their jobs. Nearly 91 million workers (71% of the labor force) are covered by the Family and Medical Leave Act and millions of workers have benefited from FMLA since its enactment. President Clinton has proposed expanding FMLA to allow workers to take up to 24 unpaid hours off each year for school and early childhood education activities, routine family medical care, and caring for an elderly relative.

Improved Access to Affordable, Quality Child Care and Early Childhood Programs. Under the Clinton-Gore Administration, federal funding for child care has more than doubled, helping parents pay for the care of about 1.5 million children in 1998, and the1996 welfare reform law increased child care funding by $4 billion over six years to provide child care assistance to families moving from welfare to work. Since 1993, the Clinton-Gore Administration has increased funding for the Head Start program by 90 percent, and in FY 2000, the program will serve approximately 880,000 children - over 160,000 more children than in 1993.

Increased the Minimum Wage. The minimum wage has risen from $4.25 to $5.15 per hour, increasing wages for 10 million workers. The President and Vice President have called for an additional increase to $6.15 over two years.

Enacted the Workforce Investment Act. The Workforce Investment Act reformed the nation's employment and training system so that it works better for today's workers. The WIA empowered individuals by giving adults more control and choice over their training or retraining and providing universal access to core labor market services; streamlined job training services by consolidating a tangle of individual programs into a simple system and creating a nationwide network of One-Stop Career Centers; enhanced accountability through tough performance standards for states, localities, and training providers; and increased flexibility so that states can innovate and experiment with new ways to train America's workers better. All 50 states are now up and running and the number of One-Stops has reached 1,200 nationwide.

Signed the Adoption and Safe Families Act. The Adoption and Safe Families Act, which was based in large part on the recommendations of the Clinton-Gore Administration's Adoption 2002 report, made sweeping changes in adoption law so that thousands of children in foster care move more quickly into safe and permanent homes. In 1999, 46,000 foster care children were adopted - more than a 64 percent increase since 1996 and well on the way to meeting the President's goal of doubling the number of adoptions from 28,000 in 1996 to 56,000 by 2002.

Putting Families First. The President and Vice President developed and implemented first-ever plan to protect our children from tobacco and end tobacco marketing targeted to young people. They also required the installation of V-chips in all new televisions, and encouraged schools to adopt school uniform policies to deter school violence and promote discipline.

Supporting Community Service. In just five years, AmeriCorps has allowed 150,000 young people to serve in their communities while earning money for college or skills training.

President's One America Initiative. President Clinton has led the nation in an effort to become One America: a place where we respect others' differences and embrace the common values that unite us. The President has been actively involved in public outreach efforts to engage Americans in this historic effort, and followed up on the work of the Initiative on Race by appointing Robert B. (Ben) Johnson as Assistant to the President and Director of the new White House Office on the President's Initiative for One America. The office is working to ensure that we have a coordinated strategy to close the opportunity gaps that exist for minorities and the underserved in this country, and build the One America we want for all of our nation's children. The President's FY 2001 budget includes $5 million for One America dialogues to promote and facilitate discussions on racial diversity and understanding. President Clinton has also appointed the most diver! se Cabinet and White House staff in history, presiding over an Administration that looks like America.

Welcoming New Americans. Since 1993, the United States has welcomed 4.4 million new American citizens. Faced with this unprecedented number of applications, the Administration undertook an initiative that has significantly reduced the backlog of citizenship applications and is restoring timely processing. Furthermore, the Administration's English as a Second Language/Civics Education Initiative will provide limited English speaking adults with instruction in both English literacy and critical life skills necessary for effective citizenship and civic participation.

Providing Fairness for Legal Immigrants. The President believes that legal immigrants should have the same economic opportunity and bear the same responsibility as other members of society. In 1997 and 1998, the President fought for and succeeded in restoring disability, health and nutritional benefits for certain legal immigrants, and he will continue to press for additional restorations. The President and Vice President have also taken executive actions to ensure that immigrants who are eligible for benefits are not deterred by language or other access barriers.

Education: Largest Investment in Education in 30 Years

Opening the Doors of College to All Americans. President Clinton proposed and enacted the HOPE Scholarships and Lifetime Learning tax credits, which in 1999 were claimed by an estimated 10 million American families struggling to pay for college. The HOPE Scholarship helps make the first two years of college universally available by providing a tax credit of up to $1,500 for tuition and fees for the first two years of college. The Lifetime Learning Tax Credit provides a 20 percent tax credit on the first $5,000 of tuition and fees for students beyond the first two years of college, or taking classes part-time (in 2003, this increases to $10,000 of tuition and fees). In his FY 2001 budget, the President has proposed expanding the Lifetime Learning tax credit with a College Opportunity tax cut, which will give families the option of taking a tax deduction or claiming a 28 percent credit for the first $5,000 of college tuition and fees until 2002, and $10,000 thereaft! er.

Expanding Work Study and Pell Grants. One million students can now work their way through college because of the President's expansion of the Work Study Program, and nearly four million students will receive a Pell Grant of up to $3,300, the largest maximum award ever. The maximum award has increased 43 percent under the Clinton-Gore Administration. This year President Clinton proposed a $77 million increase in Work Study to continue to support one million awards, and a $200 increase in the Pell Grant maximum award, to raise it to $3,500.

Making College More Affordable. The Clinton-Gore Administration has cut student fees and interest rates on all loans, expanded repayment options including income contingent repayment, and improved service through the Direct Loan Program. Students have saved $8.7 billion since 1993 through the reduction in loan fees and interest rates.

More High-Quality Teachers with Smaller Class Sizes. The Clinton-Gore Administration won a second installment of $1.3 billion for the President's plan to hire an additional 100,000 well-prepared teachers to reduce class size in the early grades, when children learn to read and master the basic skills. Already, 29,000 teachers have been hired through this initiative. This year's budget provides $1.75 billion, a $450 million increase -- enough to fund nearly 49,000 teachers.

Turning Around Failing Schools. 11 million low-income students in 13,000 school districts now benefit from higher expectations and a challenging curriculum geared to higher standards through Title I-Aid to Disadvantaged Students. The FY 2000 budget provides a $134 million accountability fund to help turn around the worst performing schools through such measures as overhauling curriculum, improving staffing, or even closing schools and reopening them as charter schools. This year, the President is proposing to nearly double investment in this fund to $250 million to help ensure all children receive a quality education.

Providing Safe After-School Opportunities for 850,000 Students Each Year. The 21st Century Community Learning Centers program will provide enriching after-school and summer school opportunities for 850,000 school-age children in rural and urban communities in FY 2000. Extended learning time has not only been shown to increase achievement in reading and math, but to decrease youth violence and drug use. Funding for this program more than doubled from FY 1999 to FY 2000. For FY 2001, the President's budget calls on Congress to invest $1 billion in 21st Century Community Learning Centers and to ensure that all children in failing schools have access to quality after-school and summer school opportunities. This proposal will double funding and triple the number of students served to 2.5 million.

Expanding Choice and Accountability in Public Schools. The Clinton-Gore Administration has worked to expand public school choice and support the growth of public charter schools, which have increased from one public charter school in the nation when the President was first elected to 2,000 today. More than 250,000 students nationwide are now enrolled in charter schools in 30 states and the District of Columbia. The President won $145 million in FY 2000 -- and has proposed $175 million in his FY 2001 budget -- to continue working toward his goal of establishing 3,000 quality charter schools by 2002.

Teaching Every Child to Read. The President challenged Americans to commit to the effort to ensure that every child can read well and independently by the third grade -- 1,400 colleges and universities took up his challenge, and 26,700 college work-study students now serve as reading tutors to help every child learn to read.

Expanding Access to Technology. With the Vice President's leadership, the Clinton-Gore Administration has made increasing access to technology a top priority. The President and Vice President created the Technology Literacy Challenge Fund to help connect every school to the Internet, increase the number of multimedia computers in the classroom and provide technology training for teachers. They increased overall investments in educational technology from $23 million in 1993 to $769 million in FY 2000, and tripled funding for Community Technology Centers to reach at least 120 low-income communities. Through the E-rate program, they secured low-cost connections to the Internet for schools, libraries, rural health clinics and hospitals, benefiting more than 80 percent of America's public schools. They also increased investment in education research to ensure all children benefit from educational technology. In 1999, 95 percent of public schools were connected to the I! nternet -- up from just 35 percent in 1994.

Supporting Local Education Reform Efforts. The President signed the Education Flexibility Partnership Act of 1999 (Ed-Flex) into law in April 1999, giving all states greater flexibility in the use of federal education funds in exchange for greater accountability for helping all students reach high academic standards.

Established the GEAR UP Mentoring Program for Middle School Children. President Clinton and Vice President Gore created and expanded GEAR UP, a nationwide mentoring initiative, to help over 750,000 low-income middle school children finish school and prepare for college. The President's FY 2001 budget would expand services to 1.4 million students.

Providing Early Education to Nearly 900,000 Children with Head Start. The President and Vice President have expanded Head Start funding by 90 percent since 1993. Head Start will reach approximately 880,000 low-income children in FY 2000 and, with the President's proposed increase for the program, will be on the way to reaching the President's goal of serving 1 million children and their families by the year 2002. The Administration also created Early Head Start, bringing Head Start's successful comprehensive services to families with children ages zero to three, and set high quality standards for both programs.

Crime and Drugs: Lowest Crime Rates in 25 Years

Lowest Crime Rates in a Generation. When President Clinton and Vice President Gore took office in 1993, the violent crime rate in America had more than quadrupled during the previous three decades. Since then, America has experienced the longest continuous drop in crime on record. The overall crime rate is the lowest in 25 years, and in 1999 crime fell for the eighth consecutive year nationwide. Violent crime rate fell 7 percent in 1999 and 27 percent since 1993. Since 1993, the murder rate is down more than 25 percent to its lowest point since 1967, and gun violence has declined by more than 35 percent.

Putting 100,000 More Police on the Streets. In 1999, ahead of schedule and under budget, the Clinton-Gore Administration met its commitment to fund an additional 100,000 police officers for our communities. As a part of the COPS Program, the President announced a distressed neighborhood grant program to increase community policing in high-crime and underserved neighborhoods. To help keep crime at record lows, in fall 1999, the President won funding for the first installment toward his goal to hire up to 50,000 more officers by 2005. This year, the Clinton-Gore budget includes over $1 billion to continue the successful COPS initiative to hire more officers, hire new community prosecutors, give police the tools and technology they need to fight crime, and to fund community-wide crime fighting efforts.


More Than Half a Million Felons, Fugitives and Domestic Abusers Denied Guns. Since taking effect in 1994, the Brady Law has helped to prevent a total of more than 536,000 felons, fugitives, domestic abusers, and other prohibited purchasers from buying guns. In November 1998, the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) took effect under the Brady Law, allowing access to a fuller set of records that law enforcement officials can use to conduct checks of all prospective gun purchases -- not just for handguns. As of March 2000, NICS has conducted over 10 million background checks on gun purchasers, and stopped an estimated 179,000 illegal gun sales.

Cracking Down on the Most Serious Gun Criminals. President Clinton and Vice President Gore have established a tough records of enforcement of our nation's gun laws by helping law enforcement take serious gun criminals out of our communities and put them where they belong: behind bars. The number of federal firearms cases prosecuted by the U.S. Attorneys increased 16 percent, from 4,754 in 1992 to 5,500 in 1999. And, by providing federal, state and local law enforcement and prosecutors with the tools they need to crack down on gun criminals, overall gun prosecutions have increased 22 percent. In addition, the average sentence for federal gun offenders has increased by nearly two years, and federal law enforcement is successfully targeting the most serious gun offenders. Between 1992 and 1998, the number of federal gun defendants sentenced to prison for three years or more went up 20 percent, and the number sentenced to five years or more went up 12 percent.

Largest Gun Enforcement Initiative in History. This year, President Clinton has proposed the largest gun enforcement initiative ever. The initiative would provide a record $280 million to add 500 new federal ATF agents and inspectors to target violent gun criminals and illegal gun traffickers that supply guns to criminals and juveniles, and fund over 1,000 new federal, state, and local gun prosecutors to take dangerous gun offenders off the streets. This initiative would also expand the ATF's crime gun tracing program by providing tracing equipment and training to 250 additional law enforcement agencies and by creating the first nationally integrated ballistics testing system. The new ballistics testing system will help law enforcement use the unique "fingerprints" of bullets or shell casings left at the scene of a crime to identify gun criminals -- even in the absence of a firearm.

Developed Comprehensive Anti-Drug Strategy Including a $195 Million National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign. The President appointed Barry McCaffrey, a four-star general, to lead the Clinton-Gore Administration's anti-drug strategy as the nation's Drug Czar. In 1997, President Clinton and Director McCaffrey launched the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign, the largest targeted effort ever to teach youth about the dangers of drugs. The Campaign uses the full power of the modern media to encourage young people to reject drug use, and helps parents, teachers and other responsible adults talk to kids about drugs and get more involved in the lives of young people. Illicit drug use among young people age 12-17 declined for the past three years, and the average age of first-time use went up. Since 1997, overall youth drug use is down by more than 20 percent, and youth marijuana use has declined by over 25 percent. Overall drug use is down since its peak in the 1970's! , drug-related murders have fallen by 48 percent since 1992, and youth drug use is leveling off or declining.

Preventing Violence with the Safe Schools/Healthy Students Initiative. Evidence shows that a comprehensive, integrated community-wide approach is an effective way to address the problems of school violence and alcohol and other drug abuse and promote healthy childhood. In 1998, President Clinton unveiled the Administration's Safe Schools/Healthy Students Initiative (SS/HS), an unprecedented joint effort involving the Departments of Education, Justice, and Health and Human Services to help communities design and implement a comprehensive approach, including educational, mental health, social service, and law enforcement services for to help combat youth violence. SS/HS has provided $146 million to 77 local education authorities who have established formal partnerships with local mental health and law enforcement agencies. This year, the President has called for a $100 million expansion of the Safe Schools/Healthy Students Initiative.

Fighting Hate Crimes. The President enacted the Hate Crimes Sentencing Enhancement Act in 1994. He held the historic White House Conference on Hate Crimes, where he called for passage of the Hate Crimes Prevention Act -- bipartisan legislation which would strengthen hate crimes laws and make it clear that America will not tolerate acts of violence based on race, color, gender, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.

Protecting Children from Sex Offenders. President Clinton signed Megan's Law and the Jacob Wetterling Crimes Against Children and Sexually Violent Offender Registration Act, requiring states to set up sex offender registration systems and require community notification when sex offenders are released from prison.

Welfare Reform and Community Empowerment: Moving Millions of Americans from Welfare to Work

Lowest Percentage of Americans on Welfare in 35 Years as More Recipients Go to Work. President Clinton has kept his promise to reform the welfare system and move more Americans from welfare to work. The percentage of Americans on welfare is at its lowest level since 1965 as record numbers of people move from welfare to work. Since January 1993, the number of people on welfare has fallen by more than half, from 14.1 million to 6.3 million. More than 1.3 million welfare recipients went to work in 1998 alone, and the percentage of adults still on welfare who were working reached 33 percent in 1999, compared to just 7 percent in 1992 -- nearly a fivefold increase. Through the Welfare to Work Partnership launched by the President, more than 20,000 businesses have hired 1.1 million former welfare recipients since 1997.

Creating New Tools to Help Families Move from Welfare to Work. The 1997 Balanced Budget Act signed by President Clinton included $3 billion to move long-term welfare recipients and low-income non-custodial fathers into jobs. The President's Access to Jobs initiative helps communities design innovative transportation solutions, such as van services, to help former welfare recipients and other low-income workers get to work. President Clinton has secured 110,000 new housing vouchers in the last two years to help welfare recipients and hard-pressed working families move closer to job opportunities, and this year he is proposing $690 million for 120,000 new housing vouchers. And the Welfare-to-Work Tax Credit provides tax incentives to encourage businesses to hire long-term welfare recipients.

Doubled Child Support Collections. President Clinton signed into law the toughest child support crackdown in history. Federal and state child support programs broke new records in 1999, collecting nearly $16 billion -- double the amount collected in 1992. The number of paternities established rose to a record 1.5 million in 1999 - more than triple the number from 516,000 in 1992. The number of child support cases with collections more than doubled during the Clinton Administration, from 2.8 million in 1992 to 4.5 million in 1999.

Teen Births Down to the Lowest Rate on Record. The teen birth rate has fallen eight years in a row, dropping 20 percent from 1991 to 1999 to the lowest rate in the 60 years data on teen births have been recorded. The teen pregnancy rate is also at the lowest rate on record. To build on this progress, the President's budget includes funding for "second chance homes" for teen parents.

Child Abuse Declines for Five Years in a Row. The number of children abused and neglected has decreased approximately 11 percent from a record 1,018,692 in 1993. While this represents progress, President Clinton and Vice President Gore continue to work to protect the health and well-being of America's children, and ending child abuse.

Expanded Investment in Urban and Rural Areas. The Clinton-Gore Administration created 31 Empowerment Zones and more than 100 Enterprise Communities, including 50 rural ECs, which have created new jobs, new opportunities and stronger communities.

Encouraging Investment in Underserved Communities with the New Markets Initiative. President Clinton's New Markets Initiative will help bring economic development and renewal to communities that have not benefited from the soaring economy by spurring more than $22 billion in new investment in urban and rural areas. On July 25, 2000, the House passed the President's New Markets Initiative in a historic bipartisan agreement that included extension and expansion of Empowerment Zones, and an increase in the Low Income Housing Tax Credit. The President has taken three New Markets Tours of underserved communities, which have helped generate more than $1 billion in private sector investment commitments.

Providing Incentives to Save. President Clinton signed legislation creating Individual Development Accounts, providing incentives for low-income families to save for a first home, higher education, or to start a new business, a key part of his 1992 community empowerment agenda. In FY 1999, $10 million was awarded to establish savings accounts for over 10,000 low-income workers in 40 communities, and an additional $10 million will be awarded in FY 2000. The President's budget provides $25 million for IDAs in FY 2001 and proposes to allow low-income working families to use IDAs to save for a car that will allow them to get or keep a job.

Health Care: Increasing Access and Improving the Nation's Health

Enacted Most Comprehensive Medicare Reforms in History. In the 1997 Balanced Budget, the Clinton-Gore Administration protected, modernized and extended the life of the Medicare Trust Fund while offering new options for patient choice and preventive care. New preventive benefits passed include coverage of annual mammograms, coverage of screening tests for both colorectal and cervical cancer, and a diabetes self-management benefit. The President proposed a plan to reform and modernize Medicare's benefits, including an optional prescription drug benefit that is affordable and available to all beneficiaries. The President has also proposed a reserve fund to help Medicare beneficiaries with extremely high prescription drug costs.

Extending the Life of the Medicare Trust Fund. When President Clinton and Vice President Gore took office, Medicare was expected to run out of money in 1999. Now, the life of the Trust Fund has been extended until 2025. Medicare is now in the soundest shape it has been since 1975.

Enacted Single Largest Investment in Health Care for Children since 1965. The five year, $24 billion State Children's Health Insurance Program (S-CHIP) will provide health care coverage for up to five million children. Two million children have already been enrolled, and in October 1999 President Clinton announced new outreach initiatives to enroll millions more uninsured, eligible children. Last year, the President launched a nationwide "Insure Kids Now" campaign that will bring together major TV and radio networks, healthcare organizations, religious groups and other community-based organizations to help enroll more children in the Children's Health Insurance Program, with the goal of enrolling 5 million of the estimated 10 million children eligible for health insurance under S-CHIP within 5 years. As of June 2000, approximately 2.5 million children were enrolled in S-CHIP. This year, the budget includes sev! eral of Vice President Gore's proposals to accelerate enrollment of children in S-CHIP. The President is also proposing a new FamilyCare program, which would give States the option to cover parents in the same plan as their children.

Passed Meaningful Health Insurance Reform. The President signed into law the Kennedy-Kassebaum Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, which helps individuals keep health insurance when they change jobs, guarantees renewability of coverage, and ensures access to health insurance for small businesses. As many as 25 million people will benefit from this law. The bill also eliminated the discriminatory tax treatment the of the approximately 10 million Americans who are self-employed; strengthened efforts to combat health care fraud, waste and abuse by creating a stable source of funding; and provided consumer protections and tax incentives for private long-term care insurance.

More Americans Have Health Insurance. From 1998 to 1999, the number of Americans with health insurance rose by 1.7 million -- two-thirds of them children. This is the first decline in the number of uninsured in 12 years. Factors contributing to the decline in the uninsured include the establishment of the historic S-CHIP program; the unprecedented outreach and enrollment efforts by the Administration and key states; and the improving economy in which increasing numbers of employers are offering health insurance. Despite historic gains, millions of Americans remain without insurance. The President and Vice President remain committed to provide health insurance coverage for all Americans.

Enacted Historic Comprehensive FDA Reform that Expedited the Review and Approval of New Drug Products. The President signed into law the 1997 FDA Modernization Act that includes important measures to modernize and streamline the regulation of biological products; increase patient access to experimental drugs and medical devices; and accelerate review of important new medications. This reform builds on the administrative initiatives implemented under the Vice President's reinventing government effort which have led U.S. drug approvals to be as fast or faster than any other industrialized nation. Average drug approval times have dropped since the beginning of the Administration from almost three years to just over one year.

Signed Mental Health Parity Provisions into Law. To help eliminate discrimination against individuals with mental illnesses, the President signed into law mental health parity provisions that prohibit health plans from establishing separate lifetime and annual limits for mental health coverage. In 1999, the White House held the first-ever Conference on Mental Health and released the Surgeon General's first Report on Mental Health. This year, the President's budget includes an investment of $100 million for mental health services, a 90 percent increase since 1993 levels.

Signed Legislation to End Drive-Through Deliveries. President Clinton signed into law common sense legislation that requires health plans to allow new mothers to remain in the hospital for at least 48 hours following most normal deliveries and 96 hours after a Cesarean section.

Extended Strong, Enforceable Patient Protections for Millions of Americans. Leading by example, the President directed all federal agencies to ensure that their employees and beneficiaries have the benefits and rights guaranteed under the proposed Patients' Bill of Rights. 85 million Americans covered by federal health plans, and Medicare and Medicaid, have the security of knowing they will have fair access to health care thanks to the President's work. The President and Vice President have called for passage of the bipartisan Patients Bill of Rights Act, to ensure that all Americans have essential protections, such as guaranteed access to needed health care specialists; access to emergency room services when and where the need arises; continuity of care protections to assure patient care if a patient's health care provider is dropped; access to a timely internal and independent external appeals process with a medical necessity standard; assurance that doctors and! patients can openly discuss treatment options; and an enforcement mechanism that ensures recourse for patients who have been harmed as a result of health plan actions.

Fighting Medicare Fraud and Waste. Since 1993, the Clinton-Gore Administration has assigned more federal prosecutors and FBI agents to fight health care fraud than ever before. As a result, convictions have gone up a full 410 percent, saving more than $50 billion in health care claims. The Balanced Budget Act gave an array of new weapons in our fight to keep scam artists and fly-by-night health care out of Medicare and Medicaid.

Released Strong New Protections for the Privacy of Electronic Medical Records. The Clinton-Gore Administration released a new regulation to protect the privacy of electronic medical records held by health plans, health care clearinghouses, and health care providers. This rule would limit the use and release of private health information without consent; restrict the disclosure of protected health information to the minimum amount of information necessary; establish new requirements for disclosure of information to researchers and others seeking access to health records; and establish new administrative and criminal sanctions for the improper use or disclosure of private information.

Implementing Comprehensive Nursing Home Quality Initiative. The Clinton-Gore Administration has issued the toughest nursing home regulations in the history of the Medicare and Medicaid programs, including increased monitoring of nursing homes to ensure that they are in compliance; requiring states to crack down on nursing homes that repeatedly violate health and safety requirements; and changing the inspection process to increase the focus on preventing bedsores, malnutrition and resident abuse. They also won a $43.5 million increase in FY 2000 to fund more rigorous inspections of nursing facilities and improved federal oversight and enforcement of nursing home quality.

Ensuring Safe Food for America's Families. President Clinton created the President's Council on Food Safety to develop a comprehensive food safety strategic plan for federal agencies. The Clinton-Gore Administration has implemented a new science-based inspection system -- Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points -- and reduced the prevalence of salmonella in raw meat and poultry by as much as 50 percent. The President signed the Food Quality Protection Act, which included special safeguards for kids and strengthened laws governing pesticides and food safety. The Administration also issued new rules to prevent foodborne illness caused by pathogens such as E. coli.

Raised Child Immunization Rates to All Time High. Childhood immunization coverage rates in 1998 were the highest ever recorded. 90 percent of toddlers in 1996, 1997 and 1998 received the most critical doses of each of the routinely recommended vaccines, surpassing the President's 1993 goal. Because childhood vaccination levels in the United States are at an all-time high, disease and death from diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, measles, mumps, rubella and Hib are at or near record lows. There was only one reported case of diphtheria, 100 reported cases of measles, and no reported cases of wild poliovirus in 1998.

Promoting Reproductive Health. The Clinton-Gore Administration has taken strong steps to protect a woman's right to choose and to promote safe reproductive health services for women. The President has provided contraceptive coverage to more than a million women covered by federal health plans; provided family planning services to low income women through the Medicaid program; stood up against attempts to prohibit the FDA from approving RU-486; and continues to fight restrictions on international family planning.

Environment: Growing the Economy And Improving the Environment

Preserving Our National Treasures. The Clinton-Gore Administration has protected tens of millions of acres, from the red rock canyons of Utah to the Florida Everglades. The Administration reached agreements to protect Yellowstone from mining and save the ancient redwoods of California's Headwaters Forest. In the FY 2000 budget, the President and Vice President won $651 million (a 42 percent increase) for Lands Legacy, a historic initiative to strengthen federal efforts to preserve national treasures and provides communities with new resources to protect local green spaces. This year, the President's budget includes a record $1.4 billion for Lands Legacy -- a 93 percent increase and the largest one-year investment ever requested for conserving America's lands.

Created Nine New National Monuments. The Clinton-Gore Administration has created nine new national monuments: Grand Staircase-Escalante, protecting spectacular red rock canyonlands in Utah; Grand Canyon-Parashant, protecting deep canyons, mountains and buttes on the north rim of the Grand Canyon; Agua Fria, protecting extensive prehistoric ruins in Arizona; the California Coastal monument, protecting thousands of islands, rocks and reefs along the California coast; Giant Sequoia National Monument in California's Sierra Nevada, protecting 34 groves of ancient sequoias, the largest trees on earth; Canyons of the Ancients National Monument protecting America's highest density of archeological sites in southwest Colorado; Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument protecting unmatched biological diversity in the Cascade Range in southern Oregon; Hanford Reach National Monument protecting critical habitat for salmon spawning along one of the last free-flowing stretches of! the Columbia River in south central Washington; Ironwood Forest National Monument protecting rich stands of ironwood trees - known to live more than 800 years -- in the Sonoran Desert of Arizona. The Administration also expanded Pinnacles National Monument in California to better protect the area's unusual rock formations, and designated Anderson Cottage, which served as Abraham Lincoln's summer home while he was president, a national monument.

Preserving Our National Forests. The President directed the National Forest Service to develop and propose regulations to provide long-term protection for 40 million acres of roadless areas within national forests and ensure that future generations will be able to enjoy the pristine wilderness. The proposed regulations would ban road building in these areas and could also prohibit logging or other activities that harm their unique ecological value.

Accelerating Toxic Cleanups and Brownfields Redevelopment. The Clinton-Gore Administration has completed clean up at more than 530 Superfund sites, more than three times as many as completed in the previous twelve years. Clean up of more than 91 percent of all sites is either completed or in progress. The Administration's brownfields redevelopment initiative has leveraged over $2.3 billion in private sector investment and generated 6,400 jobs.

Keeping Our Drinking Water Safe. The President proposed and signed legislation to strengthen the Safe Drinking Water Act to ensure that our families have healthy, clean tap water. The Clinton-Gore Administration has required America's 55,000 water utilities to provide regular reports to their customers on the quality of their drinking water. The Administration significantly tightened the arsenic standard, providing additional protection to at least 22.5 million Americans from cancer and other health problems. The Administration has adopted or proposed new standards to provide the first-ever protection against waterborne illness like Cryptosporidium, potentially preventing more than half a million illnesses each year. The Administration also proposed new rule to reduce dirty runoff and strengthen protections for 20,000 rivers, lakes and other waterways too polluted for swimming and fishing. Ninety-one percent of America's tap water from community drinking water sys! tems now meets all federal standards.

Clearing the Air of Unhealthy Pollution. The President and Vice President have adopted the toughest standards ever on soot and smog. They proposed significant reductions in tailpipe emissions from cars, light trucks and SUVs, and launched long-term effort to restore pristine skies over our national parks and wilderness areas. Since 1993, the number of Americans living in communities that meet federal air quality standards has grown by 43 million.

Reducing the Threat of Global Warming. The Clinton-Gore Administration negotiated an international treaty to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in an environmentally strong and economically sound way. The President and Vice President secured $1.1 billion in FY 2000 for research and development of energy efficiency and clean energy technologies, and set a goal of tripling U.S. use of bio-energy and bio-products by 2010. The President issued several Executive Orders. The first order directs agencies to dramatically improve energy efficiency in federal buildings, saving taxpayers over $750 million a year when fully implemented. The second order improves fuel efficiency by requiring the Federal government to reduce fuel use in its vehicle fleets by 20 percent in five years. The third order offers federal workers incentives to use public transportation, cutting fuel use and the pollution that contributes to climate change.

Protecting Oceans and Coasts. The Clinton-Gore Administration has extended the moratorium on new oil leasing off most of the U.S. coast through 2012, and permanently barred new leasing in national marine sanctuaries. They directed the development of key recommendations for strengthening federal oceans policy for the 21st century and appointed a high-level task force to oversee the implementation of those recommendations and launched a new era of ocean exploration where federal researchers will collaborate with marine research institutions and universities for ocean exploration. The President and Vice President secured a funding increase of over 100 percent to better support national marine sanctuaries, and have led the world in calling for a global ban on ocean dumping of low-level radioactive waste.

Science and Technology: A Strong Research and Development Agenda

Unprecedented Investment in Biomedical Research. Two years ago, the President called for an increase of almost 50 percent over 5 years in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) budget as part of his Research for America Fund. Since that time, the NIH budget has increased by over $4.3 billion and with the funding proposed by the President this year, the Administration will be one year ahead of schedule in reaching the 50 percent goal. As a result, NIH now supports the highest levels of research ever on nearly all types of disease and health conditions, making new breakthroughs possible in vaccine development and use, the treatment of chronic disease, and prevention and treatment of diseases such as diabetes, osteoporosis, heart disease, cancer, and neurological diseases like Alzheimers and Parkinsons. The Clinton-Gore Administration's FY 2001 budget includes a $1 billion increase for NIH.

Supporting University Research, Training the Next Generation of Scientists and Engineers. The FY 2000 budget contained a 6.6 percent increase in the National Science Foundation research budget to support science and engineering research across all fields and disciplines. This includes $126 million for the Administration's "Information Technology for the 21st Century" initiative.

Ensuring U.S. Leadership in Space Science and Exploration. The Clinton-Gore Administration won increased investment of $13.65 billion for NASA in FY 2000. This investment offers the potential of new scientific breakthroughs through an aggressive robotic series of exploration missions into the solar system, as well as enhancing our ability to monitor important changes in the earth's climate systems, and strengthening aviation safety for the traveling public.

Strengthening the Economy and National Security with Information Technology. The Administration continued our investment to help ensure that America leads the world in information technologies that predict tornadoes, design life-saving drugs, and make air travel safer and more efficient, and maintain our nuclear weapons stockpile without nuclear testing.

Changing the Way Government Does Business: Doing More for Less

Results from the Reinventing Government Initiative. Overall, the Vice President's National Performance Review recommended and Congress adopted savings of about $136 billion since 1993.

Smallest Federal Civilian Workforce in 40 Years. Since President Clinton and Vice President Gore took office, the Federal workforce has been cut by 377,000 - nearly a fifth - and is now lower than any time since 1960.

Lowest Federal Spending as a Share of the Economy Since 1966. The spending restraint under President Clinton has brought government spending down from 22.2 percent of GDP in 1992 to a projected 18.5 percent of GDP in 2000 - the lowest since 1966. At the same time, President Clinton has increased investments in education, technology and other areas that are vital to growth.

Slowest Per Capita Growth of Government Spending Since the 1950's. During the Clinton-Gore Administration, federal spending -- on a per capita basis -- grew at the slowest rate since the Eisenhower Administration, not including inflation.

Increasing Participation in Our Democracy with the Motor Voter Law. President Clinton signed the National Voter Registration Act during his first year in office -- making voting easier for millions more Americans, and leading to the registration of more than 28 million new voters.

Foreign Policy: World's Strongest Force for Peace, Freedom and Prosperity

Promoting Peace and Strengthening Democracy

Advancing peace in the Middle East by hosting the Camp David Summit between Israelis and Palestinians, which constituted the first high-level discussions of all permanent status issues; brokering peace agreements between Israel and its other neighbors, including the Palestinians and Jordan; negotiating the Wye River Accords; supporting the launch of final settlement negotiations between the Israelis and Palestinians; and revitalizing peace talks between the Syrians and Israelis.
Stabilizing Southeast Europe by ending a decade of repression and ethnic cleansing in Kosovo through leading NATO alliance to victory in air campaign and ushering in international peacekeepers, and by launching the Stability Pact to strengthen democracy, economic development and security throughout the region and accelerating its integration with the rest of Europe
Helped broker the Good Friday Peace Accord in Northern Ireland, ending decades of bloodshed and empowering the people of Northern Ireland to determine their future.
Led diplomatic efforts to end the civil war and foster multi-ethnic democracy in Bosnia.
Restored democratic government in Haiti, ending military dictatorship and stopping refugee flows.
Supporting transitions to democracy in South Africa, Nigeria, Indonesia, Central Europe and the Baltics and supporting the mediation of peace efforts in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Central African Republic, Sierra Leone, Burundi, and Ethiopia-Eritrea.
Helped end violence and protected democracy in East Timor by leading diplomatic efforts and supporting international peacekeeping mission.
Helped settle the Peru-Ecuador border dispute and end civil war in Guatemala.
Pressing for human rights and religious freedom worldwide, including in China, Burma and Sudan.
Re-started talks toward a comprehensive settlement on Cyprus.
Combating Threats

Protecting Americans from weapons of mass destruction by working to reduce Russian nuclear arsenals through implementation of strategic arms control agreements (START) and cooperative threat reduction programs, permanently eliminating nuclear weapons from Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan, easing nuclear tensions between India and Pakistan, signing the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, and achieving the indefinite extension of the Non-Proliferation Treaty and ratification of the Chemical Weapons Convention.
Enhancing military stability in Europe by successfully concluding the adapted Conventional Armed Forces in Europe Treaty.
Combating terrorism by developing a national counter-terrorism strategy, appointing a national coordinator and striking terrorist targets in Afghanistan and Sudan.
Waging war on drugs by intensifying interdiction efforts, strengthening cooperation with allies, cracking down on drug lords and providing $1.3 billion in assistance for Colombia.
Reducing North Korean threat through deterrence, including the forward deployment of 37,000 U.S. troops; diplomacy, including bilateral talks leading to a moratorium on long-range missile testing; and non-proliferation, including the eventual dismantling of North Korea's dangerous nuclear facilities.
Containing Iraq while working toward regime change through deterrence, economic sanctions, humanitarian assistance for the Iraqi people from the oil-for-food program, and support for popular opposition to Saddam Hussein's regime.
Addressing new threats by protecting America's critical infrastructure from cyber-terrorism and biological and chemical weapons.
Discussed development of a limited national missile defense to protect against attacks from states that threaten international peace and security while preserving strategic stability with Russia.
Strengthening military readiness and modernizing our armed forces.
Combating trafficking in persons, especially women and children, through the development of an integrated strategy that focuses on prevention, prosecution of traffickers, and protection of and assistance to victims.
Fighting proliferation by improving controls over Russian nuclear weapon materials, and by funding legitimate employment opportunities for former Russian nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons researchers and institutes as an alternative to selling their skills abroad.
Negotiating a protocol to the Convention on Conventional Weapons, banning antipersonnel landmines that do not self-destruct and self-deactivate, signed by all the major mine-producing nations.
Waging war on international crime by strengthening U.S. law enforcement programs and bilateral, regional and global cooperation related to drug trafficking, money laundering and other international organized crime and by providing $1.3 billion in additional funding for critical counter-drug and related initiatives throughout the Andean Region.
Mobilizing leadership and resources - including the development of new vaccines - to fight AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis, which threaten development, economic growth, stability and security.
Strengthening Alliances and Building Partnerships

Fulfilling vision of an undivided, democratic and peaceful Europe by enlarging NATO, integrating Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic and Southeast Europe, and strengthening NATO's partnerships with Russia, Ukraine and the other New Independent States.
Building a more constructive relationship with China through engagement and frank dialogue, leading to cooperation on non-proliferation and regional security, environmental protection.
Deepening security alliance with Japan through adoption of Defense Guidelines and Joint Security Declaration.
Strengthening cooperation with South Korea through jointly offered Four Party Peace Talks with North Korea and the establishment of Trilateral Consultation and Oversight Group to coordinate North Korea policy.
Supporting democracy, human rights, and market economies in Russia, Ukraine, and the countries of the former Soviet Union and promoting their international integration
Secured landmark agreements to develop oil and gas pipelines from the Caspian Sea to the Mediterranean Sea, strengthening ties in the region and ensuring Americans have continued access to vital natural resources.
Expanding trade and strengthening democracy in Asia and Latin America through the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation forum, the Summit of the Americas, and the Organization of American States.
Strengthening ties with Africa by launching the new Partnership for Economic Growth and Opportunity, achieving passage of the African Growth and Opportunity Act, and supporting the Africa Crisis Response Initiative and other regional peacekeeping efforts.
Preserved U.S. leadership role at the United Nations by reaching agreement with Congress that would enable us to pay $1 billion in back dues. Deepened security ties with the Philippines through adoption of the Visiting Forces Agreement.
Expanding Prosperity

Opening markets for U.S. exports abroad and creating American jobs through NAFTA, GATT and nearly 300 other free and fair trade agreements.
Integrating China into the world economy through landmark agreement for China's entry into the World Trade Organization that opens markets to U.S. exports, slashes Chinese tariffs, and protects American workers from dumping.
Established World Trade Organization to reduce tariffs, settle trade disputes, and enforce rules.
Reduced the possibility that a future Asian financial crisis would undermine America's prosperity by promoting structural reform -- including sound monetary policies, urging banking reforms and fighting corruption abroad.
Stimulating worldwide growth through support for the IMF and G-8 global economic strategy.
Assisted Mexico's economic recovery with $20 billion in emergency support loans.
Forgave $500 million in African debt, announced initiative to link debt relief to health and education investments, and forged agreement among G-8 industrialized countries to provide additional debt relief.
Helped to overcome the Asian financial crisis through support for multilateral and bilateral efforts and through keeping America's markets open at a critical juncture.
Helped facilitate disaster relief and reconstruction in Central American countries affected by Hurricane Mitch, committing $940 million to economic reactivation, education, public health, and future mitigation.
Helped Brazil avert financial crisis by backing $41.5 billion international support package.

---------------------

there are a lot of people eagerly hoping for a re-run, Mr. Zulu.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 04:39 AM
Response to Reply #23
42. hey thanks--I have not seen a long list of B. Clintons accomplishs before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #23
50. NAFTA, the telecommunications act of 1996
Welfare "reform", increasing homelessness, ncreasing numbers of people without health insurance, skyrocketing prison population with attendant disenfranchisement of minorities, increasing use of foodbanks, further destruction of our manufactuing base, more crappy jobs and fewer good ones.

True, he did block many of the nastiest Repub initiatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #50
67. Of course Clinton made mistakes,
but measured against the 12 years that preceded it and the debacle of the last 7 years, arguing that it was "crap" isn't going to win many converts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #67
78. Compare it to Carter's 4 years and Johnson's tenure and the Clinton years looks like paradise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #78
80. I was far better off in the Carter era
The decline of average family income from its 1973 all time high had just begun then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #80
115. The Kennedy-Johnson era had something that has been missing ever
since, especially during the last 25 years: hope and big ambitions.

It's hard to convey the sense that people had then that America could solve its domestic problems and that everyone would benefit.

The Vietnam War was the beginning of the end of that dream, and every foreign misadventure since then has been another blow to our national well-being.

To me, the Clinton era felt like a missed opportunity, a lot of little accomplishments that avoided tackling the basic sickness of our current economy and mostly benefited the yuppie class that forms the core of the DLC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #78
114. Because we know that it's really her Husband running for a Second Chance...
And, we've already gone through a Bush Second Chance and don't want another dynasty.

Women sense that she isn't running alone ...she's masking the run which is for her husband.
It smacks of a lack of "independence." And...she's gotten where she is because of the name recognition of her husband. That doesn't sit well with many women who had to carve out their lives on their own and not by association with their husbands or family connections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #67
79. What it was was a slowdown of the debacle
Some of us would still like to end it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #79
86. yeah, it sucked.
1999-

Fastest and Longest Real Wage Growth in Over Three Decades. In the last 12 months, average hourly earnings have increased 3.8 percent -- faster than the rate of inflation. The United States has had five consecutive years of real wage growth -- the longest consecutive increase since the 1960s. Since 1993, real wages are up 6.5 percent, after declining 4.3 percent during the Reagan and Bush years.

Household Income Breaks $40,000 for First Time in History. Income for median households rose $1,072, or 2.7 percent, from $39,744 in 1998 to $40,816, marking an unprecedented fifth year of significant growth in income. In 1999, the median income of African American households increased from $25,911 in 1998 to $27,910 -- an increase of $1,999, or 7.7 percent, which is the largest one-year increase ever recorded. The income of the median Hispanic household, adjusted for inflation, increased from $28,956 in 1998 to $30,735 in 1999 -- an increase of $1,779, or 6.1 percent, which is the largest one-year increase ever recorded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #86
88. It certainly did. Average wage levels never approached what they were in 1973
And what do you supposed happened to housing, food and energy prices in the meantime? The gains in household income were achieved by dramatically increasing work hours for both parents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #88
92. you act as if Clinton is responsible for the
destruction wrought by Reagan/Bush on our economy.

And your the first person I've run across to make the claim that Carter's economy was so wonderful. High inflation, high unemployment (which got higher under Reagan), high interest rates... While it's true that much of this was beyond Carter's control (triggered by the oil crisis), you're still not going to find many pining nostalgically for those days...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #92
98. He isn't responsible--he just could have done more to be pro-worker
--instead of inflicting NAFTA and welfare "reform" on us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #86
113. According to economic data, it did indeed suck for 90% of us
Schlepping this rosy view of the post 1973 economy is just what the 1% that Hillary really represents want.

http://www.alternet.org/workplace/57180/

Saying that the majority of the country's economic gains in recent years have gone to the top 1 percent of the income ladder understates the trend. You have to cut the pie into even smaller slices to get the full picture. Because, while the bottom half of the top 1 percent of the income distribution have done far better than the average wage slaves, it is a smaller slice still -- the top .01 percent -- that has grabbed most of the gains, seeing an impressive 250 percent increase in income between 1973 and 2005 from an economy that's grown by 160 percent.

An analysis by economists Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez gives us the best perspective of what's going on for everyone else. They found that despite several periods of healthy growth between 1973 and 2005, the average income of all but the top 10 percent of the income ladder -- nine out of ten American families -- fell by 11 percent when adjusted for inflation. For three decades, economic growth in the United States has gone first and foremost to building today's modern Gilded Age. The recipients of those gains don't care about a fully funded Social Security system or a healthy Medicare program -- they don't need them.

http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~saez/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #23
59. Thanks for mentioning NAFTA as a "plus", what about Telecommunications Act?
No mention of losing to Newt and the Fellas in 1994...

No mention of Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton...

No thanks. Let's turn the page please.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #59
109. if you really think you are going to gain support for Obama
by trashing Bill Clinton...

you are making a huge error, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconocrastic Donating Member (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #23
87. That was done by America
And Hillary failed in her most ambitions project
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #23
89. Thanks, I needed that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. I Don't Hate Her, But I Hate LOSING, Especially With So Much at Stake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. Unfortunately, lots of men, especially those over 60 are AFRAID
of powerful women! Any woman in the business world will confirm that! The women who don't want her as Prez are still pi*ed off at Bill and they don't want HIM back in the WH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. i know they exist, but i don't dislike her because of her gender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. I like her. But I don't trust her. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
13. The criticism of Clinton's wardrobe changes sound like the criticisms of Gore's apparel
in 2000, I dress differently when I'm in NY, California, and the deep south. It has a lot to do with climate differences. Trying to morth that into someone not being true to one's self is silly journalism.

I expect this junk from right-wingers, not liberals.

Folks stop evaluating female candidate's legs and style of dress and try to address the issues. The presidency isn't a body beautiful competition or a fashion show.

Hey, people liked the manly way GW dressed and his trimness, and almost half the electorate voted for that empty suit......voters aren't too thrilled with that empty suit now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
104. Oh? And no one comments on John Edward's appearance?
Sounds a little hypocritical to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dollface Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. Why is She Hated by Progressives?
Could it be because the right wing and the puppets in the media have been disparaging her for about 12 years now? There has been a slow, subtle drumbeat of negativity about her for a long time and progressives have been sucked into the mindset along with the trolls. (That includes me, progressive not troll that is.)

No, she is not idealistic. Idealists don't get elected because they will never pull in the middle. She is a pragmatist. You can't accomplish anything if you don't get the job. No she is not perfect, but she is damn good. She is not my first choice but I won't be offended if she wins. (I will have high expectations, however.)

Even if you don't support her, let's not give the Repukes ammunition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wanpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #16
34. Great post Dollface! And welcome to the DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. Hate? I reject the premise.
I disagree with her corporate-corrupt policies, as I do with the other annointed candidates. I don't hate any of them. The Hillary hating seems to be a monopoly of the right, but they are big on hating all of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #17
94. There are certain people (here and elsewhere)
with an irrational, gut-level, out-of-their-mind hatred of HRC that I've seen with no other candidate. Something about her just sets them off. It's like Kramer when he hears Mary Hart's voice.

I can only describe it as Hillaryphobia.

Me, she's not my first choice, and I criticize quite a few of her actions, but I would campaign for her if she got the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
18. Could it be that people who try walk the middle of the road
naturally raise the ire of those whom I describe as "true
believers". True Believers have a set of core beliefs and
values which they hold dear. Someone walking in middle is
naturally suspect. Each side wonders if he or she will
simply split the baby to solve differences or will he or
she lean right to appease in an attempt to prove bipartisanship
or as GWB simply play to the base of his party?

It is difficult for true believers to understand Middle of the
Roaders. Do they not really believe in anything?? In some
cases, people call themselves Moderate when they are as Conservative
as they come. Loose use of terms creates distrust.

This is why it is important for Middle of Roaders to tip their
hat, that is , give some specifics so electorate better understand
them. Always speaking in generalities leads to mistruat.
That is making statements which, can be interpeted as the listener
so desires.
example: GWB during his initial campaign did refer to SS"Reform"
but never any specifics. Reform did not sound threatening.
The Public was shocked and outraged when they found out Reform
really meant Privatization. Words are pesky things, are they not?

In Hillary's case, the RW has had years to define her the way they
so desire. Sad but true, one almost has to just chalk them up
as "No" Votes, hoping that she can over time create a different
picture than the one instigated by Hate Radio and some at Fox.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
19. Three reasons why: NAFTA, NAFTA and NAFTA.
Well, there are more reasons than that, and NAFTA represents more than just NAFTA. It represents Bill's biggest mistake--a whopper of one. It represents Corporate Rule, in all its ugliness. It represents the MONEYED 'Democrats' of the DLC, who betrayed us long ago, way back in the Reagan era, when they agreed to the end of the progressive tax (first set of tax cuts for the rich; tax burden shifted to the poor). She represents the WRONG ECONOMICS, from the point of view of the majority of Americans, workers and the poor.

2. She voted for the Iraq War, and never said she was wrong.

3. She lacks...warmth? Connectedness? A winning personality?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. except that she never voted on NAFTA
and has said this on the subject -

“We just can’t keep doing what we did in the twentieth century,” she told a reporter from Bloomberg, adding that we may need “a little time-out” before the enactment of any further trade deals. Accordingly, in 2005, she voted against the Central American Free Trade Agreement. Last month, she announced her opposition to the South Korean Free Trade Agreement. She has backed legislation that would impose trade sanctions on Chinese goods unless Beijing stops holding down the value of the yuan. She has even repeatedly spouted skepticism about the wisdom of NAFTA—while stopping short of blaming her husband for its deficiencies. “NAFTA was inherited by the Clinton administration,” she informed Time magazine. “I believe in the general principles it represented, but what we have learned is that we have to drive a tougher bargain.”

She did say she was wrong on the IWR vote, something along the lines of - "if I knew then what I know now, I never would have voted for it".


wrong economics ????????

The Clinton economy was the longest lasting economic expansion in our history, an expansion that benefited all levels of society, not just the wealthy, unlike Republican economies. The numbers are there, I've posted them elsewhere in this thread.

Your third point - about her personality... have you met her? Or are you just repeating the Republican spin? You know, the same sort of spin they tag every Democratic candidate with...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 04:44 AM
Response to Reply #25
43. and voted NO on the recent CAFTA bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
20. I want a chance at single payer or Universal health care, she is
Edited on Sun Jul-15-07 09:55 PM by caligirl
not the best hope for that. Manufacturing has left this country, health care reform could bring that back. While she's better than any repug any day, she isn't the person I trust with this issue. Edwards is the person I would go for, then Obama. If Hil would distance herself from corporate, if she stopped diluting her trust factor by straddling all issues for max gain, it would be easier to swallow a vote for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
21. What I said this morning applies here: No facts are cited, no statistical numbers are quoted.
It is merely asserted. And the left laps it up like a thirsty dog. No wonder on election day you're all shell shocked when your guys don't win - you start believing your own group speak.

Polls say her positives are rising and her negatives are falling. If the anti-Hillary Clinton alliance is growing by the day, so is the pro-Hillary alliance.

She leads all other Dems in national polls and in most state by state polls. She wins against the GOP frontrunners in head to head match-ups. Multiple polls show this. No, the Clinton aren't paying off all the polling organizations.

So sit around with your friends and declare how no one any of you know likes her. Write your articles and blog posts void of anything more than anecdotal evidence. Just don't ask "how did this happen" when Clinton wins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #21
30. "No wonder on election day you're all shell shocked when your guys don't win"
You mean like Harold Ford?

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 04:59 AM
Response to Reply #30
44. You supported him?

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

No, see, with Ford we didn't sit around convincing ourselves he was going to win.


No, I'm referring to lefty darlings like Howard Dean, Ned Lamont, Cynthia McKinney, and a host of others the left convinced themselves (despite all evidence) were going to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #44
83. Sorry, I was a Lamont volunteer and I disagree with your reference.
We certainly did not start out "convincing ourselves" that Ned would win. I for one attended one of the earlier meetings of volunteers for Ned and was shaking my head when I heard the primary would be held on Aug. 4! Impossible! But we persisted and, if nothing else, we got Lieberman off the Democratic ticket and made inroads on the entrenced Democratic party in our state.

Progress has fits and starts all the time. Without persistence, nothing gets done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 02:50 AM
Response to Reply #83
90. Wyldwolf doesn't need evidence or facts - blanket statements are good enough.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #90
96. the "facts" were all over the netroots - polls showed Lieberman winning...
Lamont supporters were in deep denial.

Of course, Alexander, "prooogresssiiivves" are so quick to revise history I wouldn't expect you to recall that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #83
95. you disagree with a reference I did not make
I never said Lamont supporters started out "convincing themselves" that Ned would win. But as the campaign went on, they made all manner of smug predictions of how "Holy Joe" was going down. Even when Lamont won the primary (a squeaker if you believed the netroots when they claimed how many Dems were against Lieberman), they still were in denial when the poll showed Lieberman winning the general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #44
91. I was busy working for a winning candidate named Harry Mitchell.
Edited on Tue Jul-17-07 02:55 AM by Alexander
But don't let my facts and personal history get in the way of you making your assumptions. After all, you're so wise. :eyes:

"No, see, with Ford we didn't sit around convincing ourselves he was going to win."

No, you supported a man who adopted the most right-wing platform a Democrat could possibly have, and he LOST!

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

"No, I'm referring to lefty darlings like Howard Dean, Ned Lamont, Cynthia McKinney, and a host of others the left convinced themselves (despite all evidence) were going to win."

Well, I worked my ass off for Howard Dean even when I knew it was hopeless, so your assumption is similarly incorrect there.

I would have gladly worked for Lamont against Lieberman - since Connecticut is my home - but I'm not living there right now. How about you? Are you happy Lieberman is still in the Senate?

And I never claimed to be a fan of Cynthia McKinney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #91
97. In post 30, you said you supported Harold Ford.
:shrug:

No, you supported a man who adopted the most right-wing platform a Democrat could possibly have, and he LOST!

No, I supported a black Democrat running in a red state who came very close to winning. But no one was in fantasy land like you in thinking "oh, if he'd just run as a wimpy socialist wannabe, he would have won!" :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Well, I worked my ass off for Howard Dean even when I knew it was hopeless, so your assumption is similarly incorrect there.

Wait! Are so SO egotistical that you think I was referring specifically to you? :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

I would have gladly worked for Lamont against Lieberman - since Connecticut is my home - but I'm not living there right now. How about you? Are you happy Lieberman is still in the Senate?

Nope, but I am glad the netroots and their holy crusade was turned back.

And I never claimed to be a fan of Cynthia McKinney.

Wait! Are so SO egotistical that you think I was referring specifically to you? :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
22. The right hate her because she's a female with power; the left because she's a Republican --
Edited on Sun Jul-15-07 10:49 PM by defendandprotect
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. the left wing hates her, because in their blinkered world,
anyone to the right of Noam Chomsky is a Republican...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. How do you explain Howard Dean? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. you mean the centrist governor from Vermont?
he ran to the left... the left bought it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #29
36. Actually the center BECAME the left
Because the center moved to the right... he just didn't budge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 05:01 AM
Response to Reply #36
46. I call this the left's rebranding project
"Let's call ourselves centrists so more people will like us."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 05:00 AM
Response to Reply #29
45. and crashed and burned because of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiserableFailure Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #26
31. no, the left wing hates her because
she is to the right of 80% of Democrats in Washington it seems like. She has refused to apologize for her IWR vote and her Iraq speech is too little, too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 05:02 AM
Response to Reply #31
47. fantasy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 05:38 AM
Response to Reply #31
52. She's not sure whether or not she'd pardon Scooter Libby
She essentially belongs to his crowd, and tht of Marc Rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #31
65. your post illustrates the largest problem I have with the left
and their "hatred" of Hillary Clinton.

Ignorance. And usually a willful ignorance.

HRC is NOT remotely "to the right of 80% of the Democrats in Washington". Her voting record is solidly liberal, and this information is easy to come by on the internet. She has a 95% lifetime ADA rating, IOW, she has voted with the Dem majority 95% of the time.

Dislike her if you must, but at least base your reasons in real things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiserableFailure Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #65
71. when it comes to domestic issues, sure
when it comes to foreign policy and triangulation, she positions herself to the right of 80% of democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #71
73. that's just not true
you might not like her positions when it comes to foreign policy, but it's just not correct to say that they are to the right of 80% of Democrats. She is in line with the majority of Democrats... maybe it's possible that your positions are to the left of 80% of Democrats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stressfulreality Donating Member (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #22
112. ... and everyone else hates her because she's an elitist drone (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
24. Right-wingers hate powerful women; some left-wingers hate triangulation and inoculation politics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-15-07 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
27. Because, Like Bill, She Is Willing To Sell Out Others For Her Own
This includes beating the war drum to make herself look tough. How many people have died senselessly? How many programs could have been funded instead of this war?

How can she not, at long last, have the common decency to say, "My God, have I made a terrible mistake?"

The answer to that question should help clear things up for Leonard Doyle.

But far worse than that, my fear is not that she cannot humble herself and admit that she played politics with the lives of tens of thousands of innocents, but I fear what new wars she would start to make herself look more macho.

Add to that her - and Bill's - desire to extend the powers of the executive branch, and you might have the start of the many, many reasons.

I still hope Al joins in the race, but I will be more than happy with either Obama or Edwards and will work to make sure that happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
32. "If you try to please everyone, you end up pleasing no one."
That saying will be the epitaph of Senator Clinton's presidential campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
33. Let's take a look at a few months of her voting record
I did not compile this list, but found it interesting:


YES on:
6/28/05: This was the vote to pass HR 6, a sellout of the environment to the nuclear, coal-burning and automotive industries. The emphasis on nuclear and coal facilities could leave the United States a radioactive, mercury-ridden deserted land. A couple hundred million or more children and adults could be killed by nuclear meltdowns and/or mercury poisoning. The bill sells out to those who want to make inefficient cars and thereby will continue to subject millions of Americans to the risk of death and serious health conditions, aside from the risks of mercury-poisoning and radiation-poisoning..


YES on:
7/01/05: This was the vote on H.R. 2419. The last vote before passage was a vote to reject an amendment to prohibit the use of funds for the Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator and instead utilize the amount to reduce the National Debt This has billions in funding for nuclear weapons activities. It contains full funding for Yucca Mountain, a project designed to make California a radioactive wasteland, to irradiate the Colorado River and to make much of the nation's food supply dangerously radioactive. It also uses billions of taxpayers dollars to fund nuclear weapons activities. This is perhaps the coldest, most inhuman bill voted upon this year.


Yes on:
6/09/05A: This was the confirmation vote on Richard Griffin for a lifetime appointment to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Richard Griffin has a history of taking extreme positions harmful to the environment, civil rights and the rights of workers, strikers. and consumers.


Yes on:
6/09/05B: This was the confirmation vote on David McKeague for a lifetime appointment to the Sixth Circuit. McKeague has a judicial activist history of being a strong opponent of the environment and of privacy rights. The approval of both Griffin and McKeague places the future of the natural resources and the health of the residents of the area covered by the 6th Circuit in grave jeopardy.

YES on:
5/24/05: This was the cloture motion on Priscilla Owen for the 5th Circuit. Torture-proponent Alberto Gonzales even called Owen extreme. Her record shows that she is anti-environment, anti-employee, anti-civil rights, anti-human rights, pro-discrimination and pro-polluter. This was the critical vote - the confirmation vote was a sure thing once this passed.

YES on:
5/10/05: HR 1268/HR418 involved two bills re-combined in committee. Since these bills both are catastrophic to human rights and human life and were originally two separate bills, though they were voted on together following the conference report, each of the two bills is being counted here. HR 1268 is an appropriations bill which gives profits to contractors who benefit from wars and which acts as an excuse to continue the war and the killing in Iraq. HR 418 presumes to override Articles I,II and III of the U.S. Constitution and to give the power to commit acts of terrorism, murder, torture, etc. to Michael Chertoff, a man connected with individuals involved in financing 9/11. It also eliminates political asylum in the United States by requiring the victims of persecution to obtain written proof of the persecution from the governments that are persecuting them. It also sets up the basis for a Nazi-style national ID Card while making the highways more unsafe and terrorism more likely.


YES on:
4/21/05B: This was HR 1268, the appropriations bill which took funds away from veterans injured in Iraq and from education, heath care and services for children, the elderly and the needy in America and gave approximately $81 billion dollars to those who were profiting from death.


AWOL on:
3/10/05: This was the actual vote on the bankruptcy deform bill, guaranteeing that credit card issuers can now steal homes from veterans, laid-off workers and people with serious medical conditions. (my note: although the senator did vote "yes" on nearly the exact same bill the year before.)


YES on:
2/15/05: This was the vote to confirm Michael Chertoff, a proponent of water-board torture, an individual connected to the financing of 9/11 and the man behind the round-up of thousands of people of Middle-Eastern descent following 9/11. By confirming him the Senate, in effect, endorsed terrorist attacks on America, water-board torture and racism.


Refused to stand for:
1/06/05: This was the opportunity for Senators to stand up for democracy and honest elections


The above information was mined from The Patrick Henry Democratic Club
http://patrickhenrythinktank.org/sen-score5.html

This is only a look at the last 8 months, and this list ONLY looks at the votes where she abandoned the Democratic Party principles. In other votes, she voted with the Democratic values.

If you look at her overall performance, she generally supports the social values of the Democratic party, but not the economic values. She never votes against increasing Defense Appropriations, War Money, and seldom votes to limit the Power of BIG Corporations, or seldom opposes judges KNOWN to support Corporate Management over LABOR.

Senator Clinton DID vote against CAFTA which passed with the help of other DLC defectors from the Democratic Party. Since the Corporatists had already ensured they had the votes for passage, her vote AGAINST CAFTA is not really significant.

This is the reason that "looking a the voting record" can be misleading. Politicians "swap votes" every day. A vote against CAFTA (or whatever) was meaningless once the PTB had the necessary votes for passage. The Powers that buy votes don't demand that each bought politician vote "their way" every time. They ONLY demand that their anti-LABOR legislation PASS every time. After that point, "their people" are free to "Cover Their Asses".
The votes "in committee" and the positions advocated from "the floor" are more significant than a quick look at the voting record. Even mre important are the positions that they choose to REMAIN SILENT on (thereby giving tacit approval), though these are harder to document.

For comparison,
Patrick Henry rating for:
Senator Clinton= +32

Senator Kerry= +75

Senator Kennedy= +110

Senator Boxer= +130

Senator Lieberman= -235

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. Excellent analysis.
You could single-handedly cause the Hillary fans to soil themselves.

:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. Not my objective
I'm an observer, a listener, and a reader. I need to be because I don't have a candidate that I support, thus, it is my responsibility to learn what I can about all of the candidates. I noticed that NOW has endorsed Senator Clinton. For the life of me, I can't understand why. Women are impacted by the same bad legislation and bad judges as much as men.

There are many more reasons I do not support her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #38
72. I couldn't agree more.
That's a great post! I'm saving it for my files.

TC


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #35
100. Patrick Henry Think Tank?
That bunch of whackjobs?

Actually, that analysis should cause anyone concerned with credibility to burst into gales of laughter...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #100
105. I take it you prefer the Cato Institute?
Why don't you try the freeper boards; your comments are more typical of what is found there regarding the Patrick Henry Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #105
108. LOL
another strawman rears it's head...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. Obama's rating was even worse than HRC's: -7.5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #37
40. Which is no reason to support Hillary, is it?
Edited on Mon Jul-16-07 03:10 AM by John Q. Citizen
I won't vote for her because she a corporitist and she buys into American empire.

I want change, not a re-run.

She voted for the Patriot act

She voted for the war, to fund the occupation until she voted against funding in a move to get the nomination

She distanced herself from her involvement in the plan to get rid of some candidates in future debates, she hung Edwards out to dry

She won't speak out on medical marajuana or recreational marijuana. Where does she stand?

She won't defend the constitution and call for impeachment

She won't back single payer.

She won't stick her neck out for anything unless it benefits her ambition to be President.

In one of her first town hall meetings after she announced she told the crowd, "Americans are the hardest working people in the world!" She said that with a straight face. She panders and she flatters and she tells people what she thinks they want to hear instead of what she really thinks. I find that inherently dishonest. I mean she could have said, the most productive workers, (which may be debatable) but no, she justs totally bullshits people.


There's more but that's enough not to vote for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #40
82. I am not supporting either half of Clobama
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #33
53. Great post.
Her voting record, including IWR, speaks for itself. Pandering to the right always means that certain demographics will be made to suffer unnecessarily while we go wagging the dog around the world..

I think the quote in my signature says it all about HRC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #33
58. This stuff is two years old. Sad really.
But it's good to know you "guys" love to show off you are fully loaded against Hillary, and are willing to drag out anything here on DU to hit her.

My, my.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #58
60. Guys?
Why "guys" in quotes? You responded to a post made by a female.

And "willing to drag out anything here on DU"? Since when is posting someone's voting record, thereby backing up an opinion, dragging anything out on DU?

There are very substantial reasons not to support Hilary for the primary and if those reasons are presented and backed up with fact, then that should be welcomed as opposed to those who just recklessly rant on about her. (supporters and non-supporters alike)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #60
61. That was a hacked record, nitpicked to support anti-Hillary bashing


"Guys" in quotes was not personally directed to the C&P hit piece made by a female.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #58
62. Agree, cherry pickin and bad cherry pickin at that
Edited on Mon Jul-16-07 07:08 AM by Alamom
Up to date Voting Information is available on everyone @

http://www.vote-smart.org


Almost all of this information from the link/source is someone's opinion and it doesn't look like they actually read the legislation or did not understand it.
5/24/05
The "Yes" on cloture for Priscilla Owen for the 5th Circuit, was followed the next day by a "Nea" on confirmation.

http://www.vote-smart.org/issue_keyvote_detail.php?cs_id=V3527&can_id=55463



YES on:
4/21/05B: This was HR 1268, the appropriations bill which took funds away from veterans injured in Iraq and from education, heath care and services for children, the elderly and the needy in America and gave approximately $81 billion dollars to those who were profiting from death.


http://www.vote-smart.org/issue_keyvote_detail.php?cs_id=V3508&can_id=55463

- Increases the military's total death benefits to $400,000

- Increases the death gratuity from $12,000 to $100,000 for all those military personnel killed in combat and applies the increase retroactively beginning in October 2001

- Extended insurance payouts for seriously injured troops from $25,000 to $100,000 retroactive for those injured since Oct. 2001 (as adopted in Sen. DeWine's amendment)

She has these ratings from Vets Orgs

Veterans Issues

2006 In 2006 Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America gave Senator Clinton a grade of A-.

2006 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Disabled American Veterans 80 percent in 2006.

2005 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Disabled American Veterans 92 percent in 2005.

2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Disabled American Veterans 100 percent
in 2004.



AWOL on:
3/10/05: This was the actual vote on the bankruptcy deform bill, guaranteeing that credit card issuers can now steal homes from veterans, laid-off workers and people with serious medical conditions. (my note: although the senator did vote "yes" on nearly the exact same bill the year before.)
Bill had heart surgery


You can check her ratings on Senate Votes @


http://www.vote-smart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=55463


edgr


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #33
77. But, but, but, but,
Hillary's better than lie-berman.... :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
39. I liked the Hillary of 1992. Unfortunately, politics has changed her to the way she is now. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phrogman Donating Member (940 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 03:07 AM
Response to Original message
41. Why? Because NOBODY likes a bullshit artist, and she's not even a good one
Edited on Mon Jul-16-07 03:09 AM by Phrogman
e0m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 05:17 AM
Response to Reply #41
48. *ahem!*
Among Democrats, Clinton is viewed favorably by 84% and unfavorably by 13%.

Guess you're part of that 13%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vssmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 05:34 AM
Response to Original message
49. I see 2008 as a year we could actually elect a true Liberal
Sure we could elect a middle of the road corporatist like HRC but this this election is a real open door for change not more of the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
51. The Right hates women. The Right controls the media. Weak-minded people absorb this hatred.
Edited on Mon Jul-16-07 05:37 AM by Perry Logan
If you hate Hillary, you've been infected with right-wing misogyny, that's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 05:47 AM
Response to Reply #51
54. Ridiculous and insulting
post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vssmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 06:15 AM
Response to Reply #51
55. I hate Anne Coulter
Am I being infected with right-wing misogyny?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #51
69. Oh geez.
The logic train is still waiting at the station.Try to catch it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #51
103. That does it
In 2008 I'll vote for Susan Collins over Tom Allen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
56. This hit piece lost me at “femi-Nazi”
Edited on Mon Jul-16-07 06:31 AM by Maribelle
as if I hadn't already noticed it was from a right-wing hate-the-left drool-all-over-Condi pump-Rush man-o-manos small-green-fruit-squeezer.

Some things never change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #56
81. CommonDreams is the far left's version of Fox Noise.
Both employ inflammatory rhetoric and flat-out bullshit to push their propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #81
106. The article is from The Independent, a LIBERAL British newspaper!
Here is link to original story:

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article2766305.ece

CommonDreams usually republishes news stories and articles from liberal/progressive sources. They are a far cry from Faux News!

But nice of you to disclose that you share the same dislike for the Left and progressives that Al From's DLC minions all seem to share.

While DLCers were parroting the MSM and Bush regime's propaganda on WMD, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and Israel's attack on Lebanon, The Independent had their war correspondents in the field reporting the news as they happened, without any spin. Ever heard of Robert Fisk, AK?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #106
111. And the difference is what exactly?
What I dislike is inflammatory rhetoric employed for the sheer purpose of manipulation of opinion, whatever the source may be. CommonDreams (and all articles they endorse by posting on their website) has a long and distinguished history of a nasty 'tude toward the Democratic Party in general and it is their specific campaigns of annihilation that are particularly egregious.

I find this constant struggle over the DLC and the attempts by people like you to frame input of others vis-a-vis the DLC downright ridiculous. There is a mile between the DLC and CommonDreams, and I am one of many gazillion Democrats that fall within those false parameters you have set.

Your assumption that I exist at point "X" on your arbitrary political opinion scale coupled with your assumption that since I don't think like you do I must be uninformed is so presumptuous, so over-the-top in its breadth it precludes even the possibility of a meaningful conversation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
63. Perhaps it hasn't been long enough ...
for progressives outside the beltway to ignore the failure of the Clinton competency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #63
64. what failure was that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
66. The RWers hate her for her associations with Bill, plus they have been sold
Edited on Mon Jul-16-07 08:47 AM by GreenPartyVoter
an image of her as a progressive hippy chick of some kind. As a progressive myself, I don't like her because she is too centrist and panders to everyone. (But then, even Dennis comes up north and east of me.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vssmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #66
68. Interesting graphic
1. Where are you?
2. I think Ron Paul should be in the purple.
3. I think Rudy should be higher and more to the left.

The whole thing is very interesting and thanks for posting that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #68
70. Any time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwolf68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
74. What about the South?
Edited on Mon Jul-16-07 11:56 AM by kwolf68
I remember when Kerry lost, they said it was because he didn't have any appeal in the South and the Dems needed someone who could cross these boudries. How is Hillary going to do that? Nothing. I still say she has no chance in hell of becomming President.

Hillary is strictly estbalishment stock...she is a ruling-class elite Democrat and I am sick we can't get anyone better than her.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
75. Where's the evidence?
Other than "The Feeling"

In fact the evidence shows the truth to be the exact opposite of the thesis in this article...in fact Hillary is the most popular among self described Liberals....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pink-o Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
84. I want to support her...I think she gets a bad rap a lot of the time
...but I really hate the DLC. The Froms and McAuliffes and Donna Brazilles who started the whole triagulation bullshit. And the DLC is very much embedded with the Clintons--I don't want to see them back in power any more than I appreciate Karl Rove managing this misadministration from "the shadows"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
85. I've seen a side of HRC that I don't like at all. A lot like Margaret Thatcher
and a sense of self-righteousness that makes the hair on the back of my neck stand on end.

I was never impressed by Bill Clinton although I voted for him twice. However, I do NOT like HRC and want no more Clintons in the WH.

Enough Bush and Clinton surnames in the Executive Branch. No more. :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kowanda32 Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
93.  I love me some Hillary !
And Bill Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
99. I don't hate her
I just don't trust corporate tools...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
101. K&R.
Thanks for posting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
102. There is something about her that rubs millions of people the wrong way.
And I say this as a woman who would love a female president ... But not her!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abq e streeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
107. What? Virtually everyone....agrees that she has the best chance of winning????
WHAT??? Who's virtually everyone. My own mini-straw poll tonight at the Tuesday night poker game: (ALL liberal Democrats including at least 2 Clinton fans)... Repeated my offer of a bet of any amount of money that if she's the nominee, we lose. There were NO takers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-17-07 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
110. but, Hillary gives us so many reasons to....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC