rainy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-17-07 02:28 PM
Original message |
As long as Reid does not mention the oil contract he is still being |
|
dishonest with us or else the Senate is a used up old, in the dark, obsolete body. It is about the oil and until the Dems start talking about it they are all full of shit.
|
leftchick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-17-07 02:31 PM
Response to Original message |
1. agreed, they are FULL OF SHIT! |
|
Kucinich is the only person in congress I have seen address the STEAL IRAQI OIL LAW!
:grr:
|
Tom Joad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-17-07 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. there are a few others, but i could drive them all comfortably around town in my |
|
subcompact. that's the moral poverty of US politics at the moment.
|
leftchick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-17-07 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. they are so patently obvious about who they are working for |
|
For the life of me, I do not understand the 'Dems Do or Die' Denialists.
:crazy:
|
Tom Joad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-17-07 02:32 PM
Response to Original message |
2. They do mention the oil contract. They demand Iraq cede its oil |
|
to multinationals. ain't hardly anyone in congress ('cept a token few) who want anything else but a full-blown victory for the oil cartels and capitalism.
|
terisan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-17-07 02:38 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Which other countries want the oil? Saudis, Turks, Europeans? |
ORDagnabbit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-17-07 02:41 PM
Response to Original message |
6. and a few other things like AIPAC |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:33 PM
Response to Original message |