Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama vote of present in Il. Senate Okay'd by Planned Parenthood

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 12:32 AM
Original message
Obama vote of present in Il. Senate Okay'd by Planned Parenthood
there has been some questions regarding the present that Obama voted while in the State Senate on the Abortion bills.
All that was said is that it was a strategy but, how and why was never disclosed.
The head of Planned Parenthood in illinois tells why the vote was present.


ABC News' Teddy Davis Reports: When Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., voted "present," rather than "yes" or "no" on a handful of controversial abortion votes in the Illinois state senate, he did so with the explicit support of the president and CEO of Illinois Planned Parenthood Council.

"We at Planned Parenthood view those as leadership votes," Pam Sutherland, the president and CEO of the Illinois Planned Parenthood Council, told ABC News. "We worked with him specifically on his strategy. The Republicans were in control of the Illinois Senate at the time. They loved to hold votes on 'partial birth' and 'born alive'. They put these bills out all the time . . . because they wanted to pigeonhole Democrats."

Speaking to ABC News as Obama was preparing to join Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., and the wife of Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C., in addressing Planned Parenthood’s national conference in Washington, D.C., Sutherland said Obama approached her in the late 1990s and worked with her and others in crafting the strategy of voting "present." She remembers meeting with Obama outside of the Illinois Senate chambers on the Democratic side of the aisle. She and Obama finished their conversation in his office.

"He came to me and said: 'My members are being attacked. We need to figure out a way to protect members and to protect women,'" said Sutherland in recounting her conversation with Obama. "A 'present' vote was hard to pigeonhole which is exactly what Obama wanted."

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2007/07/obama-abortion-.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. So these were constant 'when did you stop beating your wife' votes.
I am expecting giving Obama leeway on this will serve PP a lot better than their support of Holy Joe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. What hypocrisy...Here we have BO changing his votes on a key issue for political gain
Edited on Wed Jul-18-07 01:05 AM by draft_mario_cuomo
This is precisely what many BO supporters claim HRC and JE, especially the former, are guilty of. The difference? There is no credible evidence of the latter doing so. Obama changing his votes on abortion is not disputed.

The strategy was created to protect Democrats representing conservative districts. Obama represented a liberal district, the South Side of Chicago. What was his excuse for not taking a stand? Oh yeah, he wanted to run statewide...

We know if HRC did the same she would be attacked by the same people who are defending Obama doing this as being a slave to polls, not a leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bling bling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Are you powered by Energizer? Because you just keep going....and going.....and going....
and going.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Is it wrong to change your vote for political gain or not?
Or does it depend on whether the politician in question is Obama or someone else? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Give it a rest.You need someone so pure they walk on water.Obama merely swims faster than the sharks
If you can grasp the analogy, that is.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC