Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Ultimate Hillary Clinton Question

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 01:19 PM
Original message
The Ultimate Hillary Clinton Question
I hope the mods don't delete this out of hand...

(this is how I picture myself asking her the ultimate question...)

Hello Senator Clinton. The question I have for you is going to be uncomfortable, but given recent history I ultimately believe it is a fair question.

If you get elected President, and your husband gets caught having another extramarital affair, how will you cope with the subsequent media and political fallout? Do you believe it would destroy any positive achievements your administration might make? Would it destroy the Democratic Party?



--look, I like Bill Clinton. You like Bill Clinton. But I firmly believe that were it not for the Lewinsky affair Al Gore would be our President TODAY. What makes you think Bill's going to keep it in his pants this time around? Now, I really could care less about his affairs, but millions of Americans did have a problem. Surely, the Clintons' political opponents had a problem with it or at least exploited it as such. What's going to happen the next time? It could destroy a HRC Presidency. It could paralyze the nation's domestic and foreign policy agenda. It could emaciate the Democratic party -- our funds, our energy, our optimism. Is everyone here prepared to go through the whole Lewinsky affair all over again?

This line of thinking may seem offensive to some, or in bad taste, but I strongly urge you to reconsider and look at this from a purely unemotional political point of view. Yes, it'd be great to have Bill Clinton back in the white house because of his great experience and leadership skills. But it'd also be a tremendous liability due to his wandering eye. Another affair would cripple every advancement the Democratic party has made since 2000.

I have not seen this topic broached in any other posts. Maybe its verboten here. But I think it's a conversation we should have. I would like to see how DU feels about this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. I know there are more important issues that that
I just know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. in 2000
there apparently weren't. It's one of the reasons we lost to Bush - Gore didn't or couldn't associate himself with Clinton's otherwise successful Presidency. I don't want to see an iteration of that happen again.

The religious right may be quiet right now, but they didn't disappear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. What if Obama starts doing cocaine again? What if something horrible comes out of Edwards past?
What ifs are bullshit.

You cross that bridge when you come to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. what if Bush invades Iran
Edited on Wed Jul-18-07 01:58 PM by Scriptor Ignotus
is that bullshit?

Plus the odds of Obama doing coke or Edwards doing something is unpredictable but effictively nil.

Bill Clinton has a multi-decade track record of being unfaithful. I see that as fair game and something worth considering BEFORE Hillary is our nominee.




edited typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. What if pigs fly out of Kucinich's butt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. That could be worth 2 points in the polls!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. It'd get my vote for sure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #28
57. Mmmmm! Butt pig!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. You left out a word in your subject line
Shouldn't that read "The Ultimate Boneheaded Clinton Question"?

I'm no fan of Shillary, but there are many, many better candidates for "ultimate" Clinton questions than something so useless and cringe-worthy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Totally stupid question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. CORRECTION: Gore isn't president because of a 5:4 coup d'etat.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Not to mention some ice picks in the back room of some ballot counters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. *
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. That might have been a better place to use the ice picks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
30. or a hand grenade (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. With his arteries? C'mon! America'd stand up and cheer if he even COULD. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. !!!!
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. I've heard more than one Dem talking head say that
the repukes are holding back on any fresh dirt they've dug up on Bill until after Hillary gets the nom. There has to be a reason why the rw slime machine has been so quiet. If they do have anything, if Bill hasn't been 100% faithful since Monica, we'll all hear about it before the last piece of confetti has hit the floor in the convention hall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. yea
I think the RW is salivating over her being our nominee. It's their one last rallying cry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eggman67 Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Absolutely
They've been stumping for her since 2004. They'll get record RW turnout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. Mostly right wing fundie republicans would care about that
and Hillary isn't going to get their vote anyway, nor would any other Democratic candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. you don't think the Lewinsky affair
had a negative effect on the Democratic Party? You don't think that was a factor in the 2000 election? I think it's something we should be concerned with as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. Bad, bad Clinton!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
16. Bill doesn't have to do anything. They'll make the shit up as they did before (Vince Foster, etc)
If a postal worker goes, excuse me, 'postal' in Nebraska, Limbaugh and O'Reilly will be blaming the Clintons for their "culture" problems, and will be fielding calls from people throwing out all kinds of UFO style connections...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. thats a whole separate issue
the Right will make up shit about Hillary or Bill, that's a given.

I'm talking about things he was proven to have done and which is likely to happen again - namely have an affair at some point in time over a 4 or 8 year Hillary Presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
20. What kind of a friggin' question is that?
You've got a pretty small and narrow view of the world if that's the best question you can ask one of the top 3 Democratic nomination contenders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. would you argue that the Lewinsky affair had no negative
impact on Clinton's presidency (after the scandal blew up) or on the Democratic party?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #24
34. All I know is as the GOP went about impeaching Clinton
his approval rating went astronomically through the roof. I think at the height of the impeachment thing, Bill was at 70%+ approval rating. Does that sound like Lewinsky had a negative impact?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #24
39. And, as a matter of fact
in December 1998, Clinton was at 72% approval rating in the NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll, 73% in the Gallup/CNN/USA Today Poll, 71% in the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press survey, 73% in the CBS News Poll, and even 69% in the Fox News/Opinion Dynamics Poll. Most other polls had Bill in the mid to high 60's approval rating. Not exactly a negative effect from Lewinsky.

http://www.pollingreport.com/clinton-.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
25. The "ultimate" Hillary question? More like a cheesy neocon smear.
Edited on Wed Jul-18-07 03:24 PM by Perry Logan
Since the Right has taken to "pornographizing" the Presidents...let's not forget that George I had a mistress. So he was getting plenty more than Clinton. He was boffing his mistress whiule his white-haired wife sat at home...

Eisenhower had an affair, too, the randy old goat--bending her over the desk while World War II raged.

Talk about not being able to keep it in your pants!

Then there was Jefferson, fathering a child by a black maid. That's why they call him "Brown Sugar" Jefferson. You should never mention Jefferson without making a lewd reference to this fact.

As for the Republican hopefuls--aren't they mostly serial adulterers? Let's remember to mention their private parts when we're talking about them...

See? You can "pornographize" any President--or anyone else--if you care to sink so low.

And all in an effort to smear Hillary. Get help, my friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. a smear is when you make something up
stating an unpleasant fact about someone's past behavior and its logical extrapolation is not a smear. this was ten years ago, not fifty or two hundred years ago.

yes, the Republicans are cheaters and divorcees. but Clinton has a stigma all his own on this issue. remember the Clenis.

This is a valid issue to discuss, I'm afraid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
26. I suppose if rudy is the candidate she could respond
by asking whether that question has been posed to Rudy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #26
48. Good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hijinx87 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
27. no one will give a damn what bill does during a Clinton II administration

he isn't president anymore. it would be a total non-issue.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. with our media the way it is you believe that?
a total non-issue? man, you are way, way off.

if Laura Bush got caught banging some dude in the WH coat-room tonight are you trying to tell me that wouldn't be front page news for years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hijinx87 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. absolutely

it would be a political non-issue.

and you insist that I am "way, way off" because the truth
is dismissive of your gossipy point.

can we talk about something that matters?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #32
42. my opinion of the MSM doesn't matter
everyone knows THEY are gossipy. That's the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hijinx87 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #42
56. when I said "gossipy", I wasn't referring to the MSM story

I was referring to your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hijinx87 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #29
58. if laura bush got caught banging the hat-check boy

she would get the nobel "at least I wasn't fucking *" prize.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. They will be all over him trying to find out if he is having affairs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
33. I must say, I'm disappointed the admins didn't zap this reprehensible thread. Buncha Republicans!
Edited on Wed Jul-18-07 05:32 PM by Perry Logan
If you aren't familiar with "The Hunting of the President"--which is both a book and a documentary movie--you might check it out. Zillions of dollars went into smearing Clinton--and the sad results are on display here. The same degenerates who outed a CIA agent and made torture national policy wrote the memes you see repeated in this thread.

The book is by Joel Conason and Gene Lyons. Essential information for all Democrats. Find out how the Right took your President away from you. Those wingers can do anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #33
40. the Lewinsky scandal wasn't a smear
that actually happened.

What is a smear is calling me a Rebpulican for stating a historical fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
36. It did cost Gore dearly. I have thought about this with Bill.
Afterall, he will be at loose ends and he has control problems. Especially with women.
and being in the white house without being the real big shot - is he going to need to do something to sooth the manhood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broke Dad Donating Member (345 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Re: Hillary brought Bill to Iowa
Hillary is getting her ass kicked in Iowa. She brought Bill out here over the 4th of July to try to stop the bleeding.

Bringing Bill out to campaign for her makes his sexual excesses an issue (sigh) again. If you Hillary fans really want to relive the 90s, I suggest that you buy some 90s music on iTunes and throw a Dick Morris toe sucking party. Invite Bill. I'm sure that you will have a good time.

The fact that you Hillary lovers reacted so violently to this thread tells me that you are just as scared as Bill's staff was in 1992 that one of his Arkansas sweeties would derail his nomination.

Hillary Clinton is Richard Nixon in drag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. No wonder you're broke. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. yea
I wasn't sure what to expect after posting this. Of course, some of the responses attacked my Democract bonafides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
43. What if Bill runs in some election somewhere as a Republican?
If he wins, then it becomes a Republican problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
44. This is an issue and question lurking with some Democrats whether
people want to admit it or not.

It isn't an unreasonable question either based on past behavior but it must be whispered about and not spoken out loud.

I love Bill Clinton and I kind of assumed he was going to be a good boy when he was in the WH the first time. I wouldn't make that assumption again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
45. "Ultimate" as in "last"??
Oh God, please, please, pleaseeeeeeeeeeee!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
46. Beyond all else, including the fact that Bill has not been able to remain faithful since the early
years of their Marriage ... beyond all else, I'm SICK of hearing about *any Clinton* and wish they would just go back to New York State. Bill's had his reign and neither the Bush nor Clinton family qualify as *royalty.*

I don't want any more Bush or Clinton Surnames as our President ... EVER! :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indy_Dem_Defender Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
47. I feel the ultimate Hillary Clinton Question
Is will we see another Clinton just signing on the dotted line of a Bush pet project as was the case with NAFTA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hot_for_hillary Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
49. Bullshit, Gore lost not because of Bill Clinton
What were Clintons favorability numbers when he left office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hot_for_hillary Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #49
50. 66% job approval at the end of his term
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ripple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. Gore didn't lose. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. well he didn't win either - nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #49
53. not exclusively because of Bill Clinton
of course not. but explain why Gore distanced himself from Clinton during the 2000 campaign?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
54. The biggest irony, I see with Clinton,
Edited on Thu Jul-19-07 05:13 PM by Uncle Joe
is, the same man that "forgot about tomorrow" irregardless of Fleetwood Mac's 92 Democratic Convention theme song, and carried on an affair with an Intern half his age using cigars in a manner I never dreamed up even when I was an active duty Marine, who risked not only the political future of his loyal subordinate but the health of the Earth as well, would be our nation's very first, First Gentleman.

Regardless of your definition of what the word "is" is, what will our future generations' definition of the word "gentleman" be?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
55. IT wouldn't matter even if he did, Hillary would be respected all the more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC