MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 09:50 AM
Original message |
|
Why does Conyers supposedly need three more sponsors for HR 333? I don't get it.
The original reports, which seem to be getting embellished, didn't mention Cheney, didn't mention HR 333. Conyers supposedly told someone who told someone who reported that he needed 3 more congresspeople, and he'd run with impeachment.
Now it's being said here that Conyers said this on the air - not according to the original reports! It's being reported that he was talking about HR 333 - not according to the original reports!
But it just doesn't make any sense on the face of it. Why is he willing to pursue impeachment with 17 co-sponsors, but not 16?
I think something big got lost in translation here, and people will be quite disappointed when the real story comes out.
|
ayeshahaqqiqa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 09:53 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I'm wondering if it isn't how many but rather who |
|
perhaps he's waiting for a particular 3 Congresspeople to come on board.
|
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
that would make a little more sense.
|
rosesaylavee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Ahhh! That makes much more sense |
|
and perhaps his mentioning it a few days before Cindy Sheehan shows up at his office (tomorrow) puts a bit of pressure on the three holdouts.
Can the Speaker co-sign a bill? Could Nancy be one of the three?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 06:54 AM
Response to Original message |