Hillary overwhelming choice among Hispanic Democrats...

[SaveElmer]

Hillary 45
Obama 17
Richardson 5


http://www.abqtrib.com/news/2007/jul/18/clinton-obama-beat-richardson-hispanics/

[durrrty libby]

1. I wonder why Richardson gets no support from his peeps?

[Jim Sagle]

2. Hey, if you're a cheap labor conservative, she's your guy.

[William769]

3. She seems to be most everybody's.

[Jim Sagle]

6. Ahh yess...The Inevitability Shuffle. Moe thanks.

[wyldwolf]

4. are hispanics "cheap labor conservatives?"

[dmallind]

5. Yes!

Anyone who can even tolerate the idea of a Hillary candidacy is no different from Dick Cheney! How can you deny the obvious truth that there is NO DIFFERENCE between them???

These people are not TRUE Dems©, regardless of how many polls, donations or crowds seem to consider her a viable and in fact very strong candidate amongst all those "fake" Dems who are willing to donate time and money and even actually vote Democratic to maintain their charade of being TRUE Dems©! The pollsters somehow have DU's member lists and are avoiding calling the TRUE Dems© who only support Kucinich or Gravel or....well a Green Party reject but hey they're still TRUE Dems©!


Full disclosure - HRC is right now my 3rd and possibly 4th choice depending on my mood at the time. Gore would rank higher too if he ran, and so might Clark once I learn enough about him. However because I do not consider her the political twin of David Duke, and because I point out how unbelievably stupid and self-defeating that asinine meme is, I am assumed to be in her pay (nobody would support her if they weren't paid of course!) and to fanatasize about joining her black-shirted personal army one day. I am of course, not a TRUE Dem© either, but since by current DU definition that means about 3% of the party I'm not all that worried about the exclusion...