Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

USA Today editorial: Obama is the Democrats' common sense 'liberal'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 11:53 PM
Original message
USA Today editorial: Obama is the Democrats' common sense 'liberal'
http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2007/07/obama-is-the-de.html

Obama is the Democrats' common sense 'liberal'
By DeWayne Wickham

When Barack Obama announced his strategy for combating some of the most intractable problems afflicting urban blacks, he invoked the name of Robert F. Kennedy, the New York senator who was assassinated during his 1968 campaign for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination.

Kennedy, he said, looked at the poverty that wracked the Mississippi Delta and asked reporters, "How can a country like this allow it?"

But as Obama, the Illinois senator who hopes to become the Democratic Party's standard bearer in the 2008 presidential election, reeled off what he believes needs to be done to better the lives of urban blacks, I thought of another Kennedy.

Obama's prescription for healing impoverished urban communities is a mix of government programs. He pledged to link increases in the minimum wage to the cost of living index, to increase federal funding for education, and to provide affordable health care to all Americans.

This is what makes Obama a different kind of Democrat.

He's willing to contest the political right's characterization of what it means to be a liberal while challenging some of the Democratic Party's most loyal constituents to behave more responsibly. Like Kennedy, he's responding to attempts to make "liberal" a bad word not by hunkering down, but by standing tall. In so doing, he exhibits great courage — though it could come at a high cost politically.

"At a certain point, welfare got separated from the idea of work," Obama said. "There was the welfare rights movement, and people started talking as if you were just entitled to an income, whether you were trying or not. And ordinary working people — black and white — would hear that and say, 'Now hold on a second. I'm getting up at 4:30 in the morning and taking a bus two hours to get to a job, and you're telling me that you have a right to something,' and they resent it. Work has to be an important component of any anti-poverty agenda."

Imagine that, from a liberal.

While it's too soon to tell how voters will react to all of this, Obama's embrace — and definition — of the liberal label has raised the bar for his opponents in the race to become the Democratic Party's presidential candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good read--thanks! I have said it before and will say it again,
he is the new face and vision of the party, and he is going to influence it for a long time to come, no matter the outcome of '08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Absolutely
I agree with you. He is shaking up the party and it is in a good way. I don't think he will likely overtake Hillary but he is the best thing to come along for the Democrats in a long long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds like that Clinton welfare program.
Doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. I agree that Obama exhibits great courage. I disagree that he will pay a high political price for it
I think he's going to get the nomination, win the White House, and be a wonderful president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baby_bear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. If he can evoke the memory of RFK, he's in.
I am still wondering what life would have been like had Bobby not been assassinated.
What a sad day for America, for the world.

Perhaps Obama can bring a bit of that anti-cynicism back to us. Lord knows we need it after the past six+ years.

I like Hillary, but I don't think she represents the hopes, the idealism, that we need and crave. And by idealism I don't mean anything wishful or irresponsible. I mean back to the basics of our ideals in this country. No kings; people matter.

b_b

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Whatever anyone may think of her--and I see a lot of good points--I fear that she will...
...be too polarizing. If she gets the nomination, the smear machine will kick into gear like we've never seen it, before, and legions of now apathetic, mouthbreathing Clinton-haters will get off their couches and vote just to keep her out. I don't like it but I think it's an unavoidably true fact, and we can't afford to have that happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. Excellent. the combination of idealism and realistic is what makes him so appealing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
8. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
9. Obama is further left than his image.
And because of that, I support him. Obama would be a modern FDR, not a "moderate" Carter or Clinton. Again, that's why I support him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yeah, I agree.
Just look at his record at the state level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 03:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC