http://dailykos.com/Tue Jul 24, 2007 at 11:29:57 AM PDT
Check out this exchange with Republican Sen. Arlen Specter.
S: How can you get approval from sedated Ashcroft?
G: Can I continue?
S: No, answer my question.
G: Obviously there was concern about Ashcroft's condition. There are no rules governing when Ashcroft decides he is well enough.
S: He had given us AG duties.
G: We knew he was ill...
S: Not making progress. Moving on. Do you think constitution govt can survive if Pres has unilateral authority to reject congress inquiries for Exec Privilege and prevent prosecution of claim?
G: Ongoing matter, I am recused, I cannot answer.
S: I am asking about constitutional law.
G: You are talking about an on-going issue.
S: No. Answer.
G: I won't answer - it is ongoing controversy and I am recused.
Leahy: Calls for decorum (room is protesting).
S: Won't pursue. This is hopeless. You are not just AG, you are a lawyer. This is a fundamental issues separate from USA resignations. Other subject. Do you have a conflict regarding the firing of US AGs?
G: Yes.
S: Do you have a conflict of interest about Miers?
G: Yes. I won't answer.
S: Let's find one you will answer. How about death penalty case? Charlton contacted your office and said case was not appropriate for dp. Testimony that AG spent 5-10 minutes on the issue...is this accurate?
G: I have no specific recollection of this case. But we have a detailed process for capital case review.
S: I am not interested in that. I want an answer to my question. You don't remember a case regarding a man's execution?
G: I have no recollection of the conversation.
S: Do you disagree with the testimony?
G: I can't agree or disagree.
Such hubris and disrespect for Congress (including its minority), that I don't think 17 Republican votes to convict are out of the question.
* Permalink ::
* Discuss (20 comments, 20 new)