Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There is NO defense IMO to what Meiers and Bolten did in regard to the subpoenas

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:56 AM
Original message
There is NO defense IMO to what Meiers and Bolten did in regard to the subpoenas
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 12:38 PM by Hepburn
There are ways to LEGITIMATELY deal with legal issues. Ignoring them IMO is generally NOT the route to take.

I don't get at all ANY of what went on from the Repukes on the House Judic Committee today...except it seemed like that would do ANYTHING to delay and cloud the real issues that the committee was to discuss.

Subpoenas are ORDERS to appear...not just a request that anyone can refuse. If a person who is subpoenaed has a LEGIT reason for NOT giving testimony and/or appearing...or if there is a mistake in the service of the document, etc., then it is required that the person appear and raise the defense, the privilege, the error, etc.

I cannot imagine in my wildest dreams that if I were served with a subpoena that I would just blow it off. I am a lawyer ~~ Harriet Meiers is a lawyer: How in the hell can she POSSIBLY support thinking in a different mode that I do?

Are there any other "legal" people out here??? Lawyers, law students, paralegals, etc??? Does ANYONE have any idea on how in the hell someone with a legal background can come to the conclusion that a subpoena can be ignored????

Unbelievable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. No, there is no defense
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 12:05 PM by Warpy
Their butts needed to be in those chairs, period.

Had they gone and refused to answer questions or demonstrated early onset Alzheimer's (the GOP alibi), there might be a defense.

This is totally indefensible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. They flat out refuse to recognize the rule of law.
Sounds like INHERENT CONTEMPT to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, they can Ignore it if: 1. they in a coma, they in battle, on the moon,
or, in a prison camp of the enemy, etc etc

But Miers/Bolton are not in any of above....so they must appear or look incredibly AFRAID, STUPID, or GUILTY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quispquake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's to further the tentacles of power
They know by pushing this, it will end up in a court run by a Bush crony, (even/especially if it gets to the Supreme COurt), and NOTHING will happen to them, and they know that they will be able to do the same thing again...It's a total push of power...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. You know, I hear the bullshit from the Pubbies all the time...
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 12:23 PM by Hepburn
...like on the House Judic Comm hearing today...and I some times think I am living in some kind of altered reality, a place where some actually think that there are no consequences from acting illegally. Even worse? Not only NO consequences...but the illegal actors should be cannonized.

I just cannot believe that Meiers who supposedly is a lawyer would think that blowing off ANY subpoena is OK. This is just beyond me...then to have a bunch of Pubbie lawyers (both on and off the Judic comm) defend her actions???? Man, altered reality for me!

Edit for typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmosh42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Maybe the Bush gang have tipped their hand.....
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 12:32 PM by dmosh42
and feel that they can prevent the DOJ from carrying out the citation, or they can control the courtroom with their 'stooge' judge. As suggested here, maybe they should make it an 'inherent contempt', where, as I understand it, the House has the trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I agree with that.
And...I am totally appalled at BushCo having the nerve to instruct the DOJ on what they can and cannot prosecute. What total unmitigated horseshit.

I say they should proceed on their own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Golden Raisin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. If those subpoenaed were Democrats in a
Democratic administration and contemptuously, arrogantly ignored Congressional subpoenas, EVERY Republican Congressperson would be united in lockstep and storming the Whitehouse with pitchforks, torches and tar & feathers. The "fair and balanced" media would be hemorrhaging highly vocal, rabid screaming and outrage nonstop 24/7.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. What you said!
Yep...exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC