bigdarryl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 05:38 PM
Original message |
RIGHT WING pundits agree with Hillary on not talking to enemy states |
|
I have been watching all day the reaction the pundits especially the right wing pundits on the Obama Clinton disagreement on talking to enemy countries and heres a break down so far Charles Krahammer,Fred Barnes, Bill Kristal, Tucker Carlson and Pat Buchanan most of these guys were the ones beating the drum for war in Iraq and now agree with not talking to curtain countries because we don't like them this is kind of FRIGHTENING that you have these guys agreeing with Hillary it kind of gives you some insight as to who is going to make an effort to get us out of this war.
|
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 05:40 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Who watches Fred Barnes?! |
|
The 25 percenters. And not all of them even know who that asshole is.
Really, not many people watch the guys in your OP. So, do enjoy grinching about them. I sure do like picking on Tucker. But remember, it's the 25 percenters and us.
|
wyldwolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 05:41 PM
Response to Original message |
William769
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 05:42 PM
Response to Original message |
|
BTW she did not say she won't talk to enemy States (thats just a headliner being used) which may sound great to anti Hillary people, but is completely false.
|
rinsd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. BD and the truth are apparently not well aquainted |
rinsd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 05:42 PM
Response to Original message |
4. What a lame ass smear by association |
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
Considering how long this campaign season is, it would be thoughtful and polite if they could make an effort to up the quality of the slime.
|
durrrty libby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 05:44 PM
Response to Original message |
6. She is a brilliant strategist and is already putting feelers |
|
out for the General Election. How can you not get this????
It is not FRIGHTENING at all, unless you are a wussy dem, as sooo very many are.
|
Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 05:51 PM
Response to Original message |
7. She didn't say she wouldn't talk to them. nt |
wakeme2008
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 05:52 PM
Response to Original message |
8. And you can count on NONE of the RWers to vote for her nt |
William769
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
13. And whcih democratic candidate can count on the RWers to vote for them? |
TeamJordan23
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 05:52 PM
Response to Original message |
9. The Weekly Standard (aka Neo-Cons) loved her statement also. nm |
rinsd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. This thread woulnd't be complete without an appearance of Team Smear-4-Obama |
EndElectoral
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 06:14 PM
Response to Original message |
12. JFK and Kruschev talked .what's the problem? Ridiculous! Ignoring our enemies gets us into this mess |
William769
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
16. And where did she say she would ignore them? |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 06:23 PM by William769
|
journalist3072
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 06:18 PM
Response to Original message |
14. For the UMPTEENTH million time |
|
Sen. Clinton did NOT say she wouldn't talk to the leaders of rogue nations. She simply said she would not conduct such a high-level meeting without first knowing that the intentions and the way forward are, because she would not want the POTUS to be used for propaganda.
She said she might send an envoy first.
It's really disappointing that some here on DU continue to distort her comments. That's what I expect from FR.
|
William769
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. Lie would be a better term to use. |
Bullet1987
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
17. That's the way the media is spinning it... |
|
that she wouldn't and he would.
|
journalist3072
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
18. Well the media needs to be called on it as well, because it's simply NOT what she said. eom |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:00 PM
Response to Original message |