Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House: Democrats on 'crusade' against Gonzales; "constant settling of scores"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 11:19 AM
Original message
White House: Democrats on 'crusade' against Gonzales; "constant settling of scores"
Democrats on 'crusade' against Gonzales: White House
Published: Friday July 27, 2007
http://rawstory.com/news/afp/Democrats_on_crusade_against_Gonzal_07272007.html

The White House Friday accused Democrats of a "crusade" against Attorney General Alberto Gonzales after a senior US senator threatened to request a perjury inquiry into President George W. Bush's top law enforcement official.

White House spokesperson Dana Perino said Democrats in the Congress were involved in a "constant settling of scores" after they suggested that Gonzales who heads the US Justice Department, had lied in sworn testimony before Congress.

The accusation came after a top intelligence official contradicted Gonzales's testimony over a key White House meeting reportedly dealing with the controversial warrantless surveillance program aimed at terror threats.

Perino called the Democrats' criticisms of Gonzales a "crusade against him to destroy the attorney general."

"It's a constant settling of scores," she said, adding that Bush "has full confidence in the attorney general."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. I have no problem with putting him under some heavy "cross" examination
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. If "scores" equals "lawbreaking", then yes we are on a "crusade."
A crusade to uphold the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. Gonzales has been caught in a bald-faced lie...
...and that, of course, means it is time to deflect. So the new talking point is that the mean ol' Democrats are out to git Gonzo, for no good reason! Oh, and do not mention anything about his li... er, testimony, as that brings up pesky facts which are sure to distract from the main point which is, once again: the mean ol' Democrats are out to git dear Gonzo, and we cannot imagine why they would do such a thing (wringing hands)...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. once again, Republican language show their politics is all about "projection"
Seeing in others exactly what you do yourself...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NI4NI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. Call it a "crusade" or anything you want to
but "neccessary" is the word most applicable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I thought "crusade"
was what we were doing in Iraq, you know, good vs evil, christians versus muslims. Why do they throw that term into the Gonzo hearings? Isn't that fundy code?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Well, it is good vs evil n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. Gee, I thought that repukes were the party of "Law and Order" ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. why do they constantly try to honor the rule of law, when Exec Fiat trump them
Edited on Fri Jul-27-07 02:16 PM by Supersedeas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. I personally believe there are plenty of "scores"
that SHOULD be settled. Probably more than we even suspect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. And more than we can ever hope to settle n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC