Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

in 2004, Obama said not gonna run for president in 2008...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 05:23 PM
Original message
in 2004, Obama said not gonna run for president in 2008...
Edited on Sun Jul-29-07 05:24 PM by msongs
amazing what one finds when searching for something else -

___________________________________________________________________

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_go1631/is_200411/ai_n9671306

Obama silences presidential talk Newly-elected senator insists his 'entire focus' is on people of Illinois
Daily Herald (Arlington Heights, IL), November, 2004 by Eric Krol
premium

Byline: Eric Krol Daily Herald Political Writer

Democratic U.S. Sen.-elect Barack Obama made one thing clear Wednesday: he's not running for president or vice president. At least not in 2008.

"Look, I can unequivocally say I will not be running for national office in four years," said Obama, who was running on just two hours sleep following Tuesday's record-setting victory, according to aides. "My entire focus is making sure that I'm the best possible senator on behalf of the people in Illinois."

_________________________________________________________________________

looks like he changed his mind.

of course this article could have been written at that time by an agent of the not-yet-existing hillary clinton campaign.

Msongs
www.msongs.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's America...Minds change, situations change, life outlook
changes....Maybe when he made the statement he thought that someone else would step up and fill the gap...

I am not supporting anyone either way right now....but as long as we do not have another Rethuglican in the WH in 2009 that's all I care about...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. In 2004, Richardson said he'd stay as Governor of NM
He turned down any talk of VP. I respected that.

If I were a voter in Illinois I'd be upset by the flip-flopping it seems Obama has done after making this earlier statement. My Senator, Susan Collins, said she'd only serve two terms and she's gone back on that statement and we're making sure everyone knows it. We can't have it both ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. In 2004, I was a Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
30. For reals?
You've come a long way, baby!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. This does not compute. Obama never changes his position nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. And Edwards and Clinton thought their IWR votes were a good idea in 2004.
Advantage: Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. No other candidate's marketing team claims he/she never changes positions
Edited on Sun Jul-29-07 05:54 PM by draft_mario_cuomo
Well, aside from *'s team...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ariesgem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. She was also invoking 9/11 to explain her IWR vote.....
Edited on Sun Jul-29-07 06:40 PM by ariesgem
April 2004: Larry King asks Clinton whether she's "sorry" that she voted to authorize the use of force in Iraq.

"No," she says. "I don't regret giving the president authority, because at the time it was in the context of weapons of mass destruction, grave threats to the United States, and clearly, Saddam Hussein had been a real problem for the international community for more than a decade. What I regret is the way the president used the authority."

King asks Clinton if she's "frustrated" or "rethinking" her vote on the resolution.

"No," she says. "I believe strongly that after 9/11, we have to be prepared to take action to protect our country, to protect our friends and allies, American assets around the world ... Now that we're there, we're going to have to make the best of it. I think it could have been handled differently ... For the life of me, I don't understand how they had such an unrealistic view about what was going to happen."

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0404/20/lkl.00.h...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
33. So was John Edwards....while selling the war as a co-sponsor of the Blank Check
Edited on Mon Jul-30-07 04:27 PM by FrenchieCat
"The path of confronting Saddam is full of hazards. But the path of inaction is far more dangerous. This week, a week where we remember the sacrifice of thousands of innocent Americans made on 9-11, the choice could not be starker. Had we known that such attacks were imminent, we surely would have used every means at our disposal to prevent them and take out the plotters. We cannot wait for such a terrible event -- or, if weapons of mass destruction are used, one far worse -- to address the clear and present danger posed by Saddam Hussein's Iraq."
Senator John Edwards (Democrat, North Carolina)
US Senate floor statement: "Iraqi Dictator Must Go"
September 12, 2002
http://web.archive.org/web/20030219152335/edwards.senate.gov/press/2002/0912a-pr.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hillary Clinton said no to 2004 AND 2008:
http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/06/08/hillary/

Former first lady Hillary Clinton says she has no plans to launch a bid to become the country's first woman president in the next two elections.

It has often been speculated the former first lady would make a bid for the White House, but in two interviews Sunday, she said she had "no intention" to run for president in 2008 -- and would turn down invitations to run in 2004.

Clinton said she is enjoying her current political role as a senator for New York.

"I don't have any intentions or plans for running," Clinton told ABC's Barbara Walters. "I'm flattered the question gets asked. I hope that it will lead to a woman running for president."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. You beat me to it
These people need to stop trying to find dirt on a fellow Democrat. It's pretty sad and makes it understandable why the Repubs keep beating us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LadyJD Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. In addition to flip-flopping...
it could also be construed as not thinking long-term. Too bad he said "unequivocally." That one term is really the only reason it can be construed as a flip-flop. And in light of this last week's revelations about the Miami Herald interview before the debate versus what he said in the debate, he really doesn't need this to reinforce an image as a flip-flopper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Are you serious? It is normal for politicians to "deny" their true political aspirations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. It is normal for politicians to lie, and to use misleading propaganda.
That doesn't make it ok. It just points out the corruption in our political system.

From my perspective, I do not want to enable that corruption by excusing it, or by perpetuating it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. President Obama will fight against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Why would a
Edited on Sun Jul-29-07 06:33 PM by LWolf
President Obama fight against something he was a willing participant in as a Senator?

That suggestion stretches the boundaries of normal human, as well as political behavior beyond believability, to say the least.

There is no evidence, anywhere, to suggest that a "president obama" would somehow be a different man than the "candidate obama" or "senator obama."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. Anyone can change their mind. Any time.
Tiny issue for tiny minds, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. That's right.
No one is obliged in any way, at any time, to keep their word.

No vows, no promises, are safe or sacred. No one should be held accountable for breaking them. They didn't lie, or break promises. They just

"changed their minds."

Anyone who actually expects people to keep their word has a "tiny mind."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. I would be more terrified if a person didn't change their mind
Just like Hillary did when she said she wouldn't run in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Frankly, I'm not terrified.
I don't get much out of fear, so I choose not to indulge.

Changing one's mind is ok much of the time. Changing one's mind about what to have for dinner, what to wear to the wedding, etc.. is not a problem at all.

Changing one's mind when it involves breaking a promise, a vow, a commitment, is something else entirely. That breaks a trust. It happens, and sometimes it happens legitimately. If the original promise was flawed to begin with, then there is at least some legitimacy in breaking it, even if it breaks other things along the way.

Politicians change their mind according to which way the wind, or spin, is blowing. That's why calls to "trust" them are so ridiculous, frankly. That's why repeating campaign talking points is like spreading a cloud over the person. When the campaign is over, that cloud of spin, propaganda, promises, and mischaracterization will burn off to reveal what the credulous voted for.

Obama's mind change has two aspects for me: First, the use of the term "unequivocal," as I interpret it, means a promise not to change his mind. That can only leave potential voters to wonder what other "unequivocal" positions he has that might shift in the wind. To his credit, he tends to leave "everything on the table." That is a serving of honesty that many don't seem to want to digest. They seem to think he doesn't really mean it when he leaves things like nuclear power plants, teacher merit pay, etc. on the table.

Secondly, it debunks the "fresh face/blood/ideas" characterization that seems to impress so many about Obama. It is politics as usual.

I don't give HRC a pass, either. It all holds true for her as well, although she spun it less "unequivocally." In other words, her propaganda was smarter, and more calculated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. Yes. Tiny mind.
At least you admit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. I forgot one thing which you seem to need here:
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. Bill Clinton when running for reelection as Governor said he wasn't going to run for President .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
13. it's just an fyi post, i've vote for him if he's the nominee nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. Delighted he changed his mind
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
21. Nov. 2004??? no one takes that seriously when it is that old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. Excellent, if this opinion applies to "all" the candidates. nm
Edited on Mon Jul-30-07 07:20 AM by Alamom



:)


edgr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. ...
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
22. Heh, heh, heh

Gotta love this stuff.

:evilgrin: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
28. In 1991 I said I'd never vote for a Democrat
I have in every election since.

Guess I lied...or changed my mind...or both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
29. People change their minds
to me this is no big deal. I think it's the right time for Obama to run, although this time I would rather have him be the VP choice and then he could try again in four or eight years.
It's not an endorsement for him to be the VP choice but I think he wouldn't be the worst choice to be the second name on the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
31. HOLY SHIT! "looks like he changed his mind" THIS IS HUGH11!1111 IM SERIES
Did you actually have a point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
32. Everyone says that shit. Especially those running for a lower office (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC