Its not about the candidates, so much as the environment. The GOP spent a lot of its efforts on party-building, even as our party focused its efforts on short-term election strategies. As a result, the GOP forged a favorable place in the public mind: they are a party of beliefs, we are a party that just wants to win the next election.
But the GOP movement was never sustainable. Their politicians are far too smart to believe in what the rank and file GOP voters believe in. But they've been all too wiling to pretend to believe. All that was ever needed was a persistent opposition, or an event that exposed their fraud. Iraq and Katrina cooked their goose pretty good.
So what are they left with? God, guns and gays again. And tax cuts. But because their credibility is shot, less people are willing to go along with their absurd agendas in these areas. So they are screwed.
Rudy Giuliani can't save them. The pro-life wackos will refuse him.
Romney can't save them. The fundies won't back him - even against Hillary.
John McCain is finished. He picked the wrong horse, and now his credibility is gone.
Fred Thompson isn't the savior either. But even if he gets the nomination, he's fighting an uphill battle, taking the narrow GOP point of view, and President Clinton, folks just don't want to hear that stuff anymore.
Even if we nominate a candidate that unifies the GOP, they are still working with a shrunken slice of the pie. There aren't enough haters on their side to get them to 270 EVs. (
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17150019/)
So I firmly believe that it doesn't matter who we nominate. We are going to have a Dem president in Jan 2009. The issue is whether we are going to grow up and become a party about something, or if we're going to continue to be the political strategy party.
If we stand for something (bringing back the US Constitution, for example), we could conceivably destroy the GOP for years to come. If not, then we are just waiting around for the GOP to recover and take power again.