Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton Loses Ground to Obama in new State Polling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 10:36 AM
Original message
Clinton Loses Ground to Obama in new State Polling
American Research Group has released new polls from three early states in the 2008 presidential nominating race.

On the Democratic side, Sen. Hillary Clinton has lost ground to Sen. Barack Obama in New Hampshire and South Carolina as Obama has gained among male Democrats in both states. Clinton continues to lead Edwards among Democrats in Iowa, with Bill Richardson cutting into Edwards' support among Democrats and Richardson leading among independents in the state. These results suggest Obama benefited from the July 23 debate and its aftermath in New Hampshire and South Carolina.

On the Republican side, Mitt Romney has slipped in Iowa and New Hampshire and he is now essentially tied with Rudy Giuliani in those two states. In South Carolina, Giuliani is tied with Fred Thompson as John McCain has slipped into third place, giving up his lead among independents to Thompson.

Iowa:

* Among Democrats, Clinton 30%, Edwards 21%, Obama 15%, Richardson 13%
* Among Republicans, Giuliani 22%, Romney 21%, McCain 17%, Thompson 13%

New Hampshire:

* Among Democrats, Obama 31%, Clinton 31%, Edwards 14%, Richardson 7%
* Among Republicans, Giuliani 27%, Romney 26%, Thompson 13%, McCain 10%

South Carolina:

* Among Democrats, Obama 33%, Clinton 29%, Edwards 18%
* Among Republicans, Giuliani 28%, Thompson 27%, McCain 10%, Romney 7%

http://politicalwire.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dancingme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Go Obama!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't like those Iowa numbers, but South Kacalacki and NH are looking good.
I guess the voters aren't buying the spin of the war enablers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skyblue Donating Member (724 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
34. Sorry but the towers were in NY. NYrs are pushy, aggressive, pugilistic.
And alot of them retire to F L O R I D A (Bonus). I suppose alot of them deal less better with facts than with their tough guy nature.

How was she supposed to vote when lots of these people pass by the missing towers everyday and maybe when they come home lights may have appeared where the towers used to be. NY'rs were most likely pro war-- sadly enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. No Way Will NH Go For Mrs. Clinton
My neighbors to the north much prefer forthrightness and consistency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hijinx87 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. excellent.

so, hillary is dishonest and inconsistent.:eyes:

why not just come right out and say it directly? at least
that WOULD be forthright and consistent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. How Did My Statement Differ From Your Suggestion?
Perhaps an example of how they could describe different activities would help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hijinx87 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. I didn't think it differed at all.

I just wanted to see for certain if you were willing to call
a leading candidate the democratic nomination for president
out-and-out dishonest.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Hillary is dishonest and inconsistent
Oh hell, I'll say it day and night until every DUer finally gets it through their head that WE CAN DO BETTER. ANY Democrat would be better than her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. And isn't vilsack a supporter of
hillary which might explain some of the support in Iowa?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #19
33. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. Here in SC...
I've seen it on the ground all along. Obama will win South Carolina. GOBAMA!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
7. Obama plummeting like a rock in the polls..
Edited on Tue Jul-31-07 11:42 AM by Tellurian
Senator Hillary Clinton leads all challengers with:

41% support among Likely Democratic Primary Voters.

Illinois Senator Barack Obama is a distant second at 23%

while former North Carolina Senator John Edwards is preferred by 14%

edited to add link:

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_2008__1/daily_presidential_tracking_polling_history

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beastieboy Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. Among democrats and women, she is way ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. And How!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
9. Good for Obama.
Though I have to snicker at the sudden credibility ARG polls enjoy with Obama supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. And don't forget the weasley poll pact ..
If anything, after the stunt Obama pulled name calling Hillary all last week, his numbers have only one place to go and thats down! I never thought Obama's star power would burn out so quickly. He should have waited 8 more years to have a record of accomplishments and a decent campaign organization in place before he attempted to take on a presidential bid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. The is a minor spat going largely unnoticed by the general populace.
And that actually hurts Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. Hum, it seems like good news, but I don't buy that Edwards Iowa number
then again numbers in Iowa mean almost nothing, in a caucus it is all about organization and enthusiasm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. It's Trippi
His numbers have fallen in NH since Trippi took over in April too. His far left lurch only appeals to about 20% of the Dem grassroots, and comes off as disingenuous because at least half of it differs so greatly from what he was saying 5 years ago. The more people compare Edwards' talk with Obama's walk, the worse Edwards is going to do. Edwards desperately needs a change in advisers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. That is false
Edwards tanked in NH after he attacked Clobama during the June NH debate. He was doing fine until then. Moreover, the poll in the OP shows Edwards gaining three points in NH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOVA_Dem Donating Member (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. I think Edwards has moved too far to the left to make...
himself a viable general election candidate and that is what I think you're seeing in the polling. Edwards would be my 2nd choice but I think he's made some calculations that would put him at an extreme disadvantage in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. It's not a matter of left
His policies are relatively fine, they're what people want. It's a matter of the words he uses to present them, the tone he creates. He creates a radical left divisive tone, and that comes straight from Trippi. It's not enough to win the Dem Party, let alone the GE. Not to mention, it's so completely different than what so many remember from 2002, that they just scratch their head and walk away. I sincerely hope he dumps Trippi soon, and gets back to common talk for common people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
11. I think Obama needs to improve in Iowa and he will than be in a great position. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. How's NV?
The west is slightly different than Iowa even. I haven't seen how he's doing out here yet either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. All polling has Hillary up big in NV though the last poll is a month old
Mason-Dixon 06/20 - 06/22 39 17 12 1 7 Clinton +22.0
American Res. Group 06/15 - 06/19 40 16 16 -- 6 Clinton +24.0
Mason-Dixon 04/30 - 05/02 37 12 13 9 6 Clinton +24.0
Zogby 04/11 - 04/12 35 21 15 -- 5 Clinton +14.0
Susquehanna (R) 03/06 - 03/09 32 17 16 -- -- Clinton +15.0
Research 2000 03/06 - 03/08 32 20 11 11 2 Clinton +12.0
American Res. Group 12/19 - 12/23 37 12 8 -- -- Clinton +25.0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. single mom service worker
vote. I'd read that was going to Hillary. They need to send Michelle to NV, not that you would be interested in Obama strategy, hehe. Thanks for the data!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Edwards caught him for 2nd in the last ARG NV poll
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yukari Yakumo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 04:26 AM
Response to Reply #16
38. In the West...
Ed is getting throttled. Except for Idaho, he's not even cracking 15% in most polls.

Then again, most polls are over a month old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
24. Good news for Obama, mixed bag for Edwards (mostly bad)
Edited on Tue Jul-31-07 02:58 PM by draft_mario_cuomo
Perhaps last week did help him.

As far as Edwards goes, it is a mixed bag. He is finally recovering ground in NH in the ARG poll but he lost ground in SC (about 4 points) and IA. However, he list 8 points in IA and that is disturbing. That said, another IA poll released last week had him gaining and Clinton and Obama losing. We'll have to see which trend proves to be accurate in future polls but the ARG poll is certainly cause for concern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broke Dad Donating Member (345 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. KCCI poll shows Edwards up 27 - 22 on Hillary
Research 2000/KCCI
7/26/2007

See poll details

A new poll from KCCI in Des Moines shows John Edwards and Mitt Romney leading their respective parties.

Edwards was tops among Dems, favored by 27 percent of respondents. He was followed by Hillary Clinton (22 percent), Barack Obama (16 percent) and Bill Richardson (11 percent). Clinton and Obama both saw their numbers drop by 6 percentage points compared to the same poll in May, while Richardson for a boost of 4 percentage points.

On the Republican side, Mitt Romney was favored by 25 percent of respondents, followed by Fred Thompson at 14 percent, Rudy Giuliani at 13 percent and John McCain at 10 percent. Romney saw his numbers jump by 9 percentage points since the May poll, while Giuliani dropped by 4 percentage points and McCain dropped by 8 percentage points.

The telephone poll of 600 likely voters was conducted July 23-25 by Research 2000 and has a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.

In Iowa, we know the people at KCCI. As my father told me down on the farm, "Figures don't lie, but liars will figure."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
27. Mason-Dixon also had Obama ahead in SC
Edited on Tue Jul-31-07 04:00 PM by maximusveritas
and the NH result is consistent with other polls showing a tightening of that race between Obama and Hillary.
The only bad news for Obama is that he hasn't made much progress in Iowa and I'm not sure he ever will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Obama was the only candidate to gain points (only two, mind you) in the latest IA ARG poll.
Edited on Tue Jul-31-07 07:00 PM by jefferson_dem
The only one who stands to lose by not winning Iowa is Edwards. CW is that if he loses IA, he's done.

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. I agree with that
I know Obama has started to put more money into Iowa, so hopefully that'll pay off eventually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madville Donating Member (743 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Iowa is 95% white
I doubt Obama can win Iowa with it being 95% white. They are going to support Edwards and Clinton for the most part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. So white people don't support black candidates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gelliebeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 04:00 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
31. Good news for Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
djjimz Donating Member (223 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
37. Hillary in 2008
I like Obama and believe that one day he will be a doable candidate for POTUS.
I can even see him playing a part in the next administration, but …
Unless some horrific shit hit’s the fan, I’m backing Hillary.
I listen to all of them and none comes across as sincere as she does.
:dem:
Of course, that’s only my opinion.
I’m a DEMOCRAT and no matter who we end up nominating will get my vote and unyielding support.

525 days till freedom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
39. The more I get to see Obama, the more I'm convinced he should be the prez...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
40. It is good to see him moving up. As people get to know him, he
will do well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC