Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

To me - endorsements don't mean SHIT...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 01:04 PM
Original message
To me - endorsements don't mean SHIT...
Edited on Thu Aug-02-07 01:04 PM by HawkeyeX
We, the people, have the right to decide who our next president would be.

Who agrees?

(I'm referring to the latest endorsement from Ms. Baldwin - who I have respect for)

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. doesn't impact me, either. neither do the polls. I'm planning to vote for
a candidate in the primary if that candidate is still around. If not, I'm voting for Kucinich.

If you-know-who gets the nomination, I'm writing in someone. You-know-who will never carry this state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm with ya to a point, but
if I saw General Clark on stage with a Presidential candidate raising his/her hand high above and announcing that he was endorsing so and so, it would cause me to pause and reflect deeply. Conversely I look forward to a goper getting an endorsement from grover norquist, it really helps whittle the list down. (Not that I would ever again vote for a republican, I haven't since Ford in 76.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. BFD-- it's all part of the game and it's not for you anyway...
don't flatter yourself thinking that they are trying to impress you.

It's about who can deliver votes and then payback time when the election is over.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm with you. Anyone influenced by endorsements doesn't know the pay-offs and sweet whisper
Edited on Thu Aug-02-07 01:22 PM by ShortnFiery
promises that are often part of "the deal." It's disingenuous to say the least and I hope all these people who come out early endorsing especially HRC for perhaps, a place on the cabinet, are sorely disappointed by someone else (Obama or Edwards) winning the Democratic Nomination. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think Gore and Feingold are independent enough that their endorsements are meaningful.
Edited on Thu Aug-02-07 01:25 PM by Heaven and Earth
Other than those two, I really don't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. here's what Baldwin's endorsement means
it means that a progressive can vote for Hillary.

There is an idea out there that Hillary and progressivism are totally uncompatible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trogdor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. They only mean something if you belong to the endorsing group.
For example, if you belong to the UAW, you probably do care who the UAW endorses and why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. Endorsements are double-edged.
If someone you like makes an endorsement of someone you have a problem with, it will inevitably shake your confidence in the endorser.

As I understand it, Ms Baldwin supports universal health care. But she now endorses someone who wants to keep health care in the hands of the insurance companies. That would be a problem.

But as I never heard of Baldwin before today, it's nada to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC