Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wary of Recess Appointments, Senate Democrats Weigh August ‘Pro Forma’ Sessions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 01:11 PM
Original message
Wary of Recess Appointments, Senate Democrats Weigh August ‘Pro Forma’ Sessions
I think the Dems are being 'played'.



Wary of Recess Appointments, Senate Democrats Weigh August ‘Pro Forma’ Sessions
By Bart Jansen, CQ Staff


Majority Leader Harry Reid confidently predicted that Bush will not use his constitutional authority to fill top jobs without Senate confirmation. “We have an agreement with the president,” said Reid, D-Nev. “We don’t think there will be any.”:eyes:

Privately, a leadership aide said amicable negotiations are under way, but a series of pro forma sessions during August remains a possibility.

A White House spokeswoman said Reid was wrong. “We do not have an agreement,” said Emily Lawrimore. “We don’t ever comment on the potential for recess appointments.”

Jim Manley, a Reid spokesman, said Democrats have worked with Republicans to clear nominees this week to high-level posts at the Treasury, Energy and Education departments, as well as two ambassadors, 56 generals and five admirals. Committees are working to clear other non-controversial nominees.

“In view of this work and our view that the process is working well, the issue of recesses should be moot,” Manley said. “If, despite this work, we see that the president still plans to recess {appoint} controversial nominees, Sen. Reid may need to keep the Senate in pro forma session during the August break.”

Rather than having the Senate adopt a month-long adjournment resolution, Reid could opt for a recess of a few days. Then, Democratic senators — most likely from Maryland, Virginia or another nearby state — would be asked to take turns convening the Senate briefly every few days.

more...

http://public.cq.com/docs/cqt/news110-000002565848.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. I like Biden's stance on this
“There will be no recess appointments on my committee or they will not get another single nominee for anything at all from the Committee on Foreign Relations,” Biden declared. “I made that clear to the secretary of State. Absolutely, positively clear. Not a one. Mark me down. Not a one.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 03:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. if he was serious, he'd advocate for not recessing. and you know he will approve whoever they send
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. "We have an agreement with the president"
How many times are we going to get kicked in the balls before we figure out that there are no agreements, the game is being played for keeps, and the other side is an international organized crime family?

Our leaders are idiots, and I am an authority on idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. what kind of fucking retard makes an agreement with Bush? he will not only break it but fuck you up
the ass while doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC