Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Thank you Congress for my dilemma...House Approves Foreign Wiretap Bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 10:02 PM
Original message
Thank you Congress for my dilemma...House Approves Foreign Wiretap Bill
Edited on Sat Aug-04-07 10:11 PM by dajoki
Should I continue to email my friend in London, and if I do, will I be on some kind of watch list? We grew up and graduated high school together and have always stayed in touch. He moved to London about 10 years ago because of a job transfer and he loves it. We have kept in touch through email, can we still do that? Of course the recently passed bill will not change that, but will I now be harrassed?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Associated Press
House Approves Foreign Wiretap Bill
By CHARLES BABINGTON 08.04.07, 10:27 PM ET
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/08/04/ap3988006.html

WASHINGTON - The House handed President Bush a victory Saturday, voting to expand the government's abilities to eavesdrop without warrants on foreign suspects whose communications pass through the United States.

The 227-183 vote, which followed the Senate's approval Friday, sends the bill to Bush for his signature. He had urged Congress to approve it, saying Saturday, "Protecting America is our most solemn obligation."

<<snip>>

Many congressional Democrats wanted tighter restrictions on government surveillance, but yielded in the face of Bush's veto threats and the impending August recess.

"This bill would grant the attorney general the ability to wiretap anybody, any place, any time without court review, without any checks and balances," said Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., during the debate preceding the vote. "I think this unwarranted, unprecedented measure would simply eviscerate the 4th Amendment," which prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just imagine all the overseas business calls
that are now fair game.

Repubs never shrank away from a good swindle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Everyone is fair game...
as I pointed out with my situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC