Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Six Judiciary Committee Members for Impeachment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
davidswanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 09:52 AM
Original message
Six Judiciary Committee Members for Impeachment
By David Swanson

Forty-five Congress Members now stand in one manner or another for impeachment.

Congressman Steve Cohen from Tennessee, and Congresswoman Shiela Jackson-Lee of Texas have signed onto H. Res. 333. That makes six Judiciary Committee members ready to impeach the Vice President. The other four are Hank Johnson of Georgia, Keith Ellison of Minnesota, Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, and Maxine Waters of California. Four of these six are African American. A fifth, Cohen, is white but represents a majority black district and attempted unsuccessfully to join the Congressional Black Caucus. All six represent urban districts, three from the South, two from the Midwest, and one from Southern California. All six are Democrats. None of the six chairs a subcomittee. Three of them are freshmen.

There are 23 Democrats on the Judiciary Committee, and 17 Republicans.

All told, 19 congress members have signed on as cosponsors of H. Res. 333, a bill proposing articles of impeachment against Vice President Dick Cheney. H Res 333 cosponsors include, Dennis Kucinich, Jan Schakowsky, Maxine Waters, Hank Johnson, Keith Ellison, Lynn Woolsey, Barbara Lee, Albert Wynn, William Lacy Clay, Yvette Clarke, Jim McDermott, Jim Moran, Bob Filner, Sam Farr, Robert Brady, Tammy Baldwin, Donald Payne, Steve Cohen, Sheila Jackson-Lee. Nine are African-American, 10 are white. All 19 are from urban or suburban areas, three from the South, five from the Midwest, five from the East, and six from the West. One, Jan Schakowsky, is Chief Deputy Democratic Whip. Let's hope she starts whipping!

Twenty-eight congress members have signed onto H Res. 589, a bill proposing the impeachment of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. The cosponsors are Jay Inslee, Xavier Becerra, Michael Arcuri, Ben Chandler, Dennis Moore, Bruce Braley, Tom Udall, Earl Blumenauer, Peter DeFazio, Hank Johnson, Steve Cohen, Keith Ellison, David Wu, Yvette Clarke, Darlene Hooley, Betty McCollum, Timothy Bishop, Barney Frank, Carolyn Maloney, Ed Perlmutter, Tammy Baldwin, Shelley Berkley, Raul Grijalva, Ed Pastor, Ellen Tauscher, Rush Holt, Jim McGovern, Gary Ackerman.

Only Johnson, Ellison, Clarke, Baldwin, and Cohen have signed onto both bills (four of them Judiciary Committee Members, four of them freshmen). (19 + 28 - 5 = 42)

Congressmen Jesse Jackson Jr. and Maurice Hinchey have recently said that they support the impeachment of Cheney and Bush, but have not yet signed onto any bills. (42 + 2 = 44)

Other Congress Members have said privately that they favor impeachment but not these bills, even that they would only support impeachment if it included Bush. The lack of cross-over support between the two existing bills is an indication of the importance of petty personal politics within Congress, and the extent to which Congress Members will sign onto a bill based on who the sponsor and cosponsors are and who asks them, and whether anyone asks them, to sign on.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has opposed impeachment since May 2006, but this week said that if she were not the Speaker she would probably be backing impeachment, and that impeachment of Gonzales is clearly merited. (44 + 1 = 45)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NRaleighLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. I will only believe appropriate ACTION when I see it. Fool me once.....
too many boys and girls who cried wolf. I simply don't believe that our Dem elected officials have the will or desire for anything to change. And that is simply sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rabies1 Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Right on. Until words are backed up with some ACTION
Nothing will happen except some hearings, investigations, and a lot of complaining.
Meanwhile kiss this nation goodbye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. K&R. The groundswell continues, the facts (crimes) do not go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. OK Conyers. Put up or shut up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. noo sheeet...put up or shut up!! i agree!! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. And there you have the list of the only Democrats I'd even consider
supporting financially.

I had a call from the California Democratic Party begging for money and I put it straight to them - "no IMPEACHMENT? No MONEY. PERIOD."

I've had it. I'm not throwing good money after bad. Presidential candidates included. If they won't fight bush, how on earth can we be confident that they'll ever fight al Qaeda?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fiendish Thingy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. No Impeachment, No Money- that's what I said to Obama's phone crew 3 times last week
and that's what I write on every Dem fundraiser letter I get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fiendish Thingy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Impeachment would make the bitterness of the FISA vote a little less bitter
Conyers has his "3 more" and then some, but I guess we'll have to wait until September to see what he does...and then it will likely be overshadowed by Petreaus's report...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry Monroe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. So what the hell are they waiting for??
LET'S GET THIS PARTY STARTED!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC