flpoljunkie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-05-07 10:09 AM
Original message |
Hillary said at Yearlykos forum that Dean's 50-State strategy was "exactly the right thing to do" |
|
Now that's real interesting. Didn't her attack dog James Carville go after Dr. Dean for his 50-state strategy, even calling it "Rumsfeldian"--and, reportedly tried to get Dean replaced as DNC head with Harold Ford--now president of Al From's DLC? A less than subtle attempt to rewrite history here for the Yearlykos attendees? http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/11/17/ap/politics/mainD8LF47580.shtml
|
ChairmanAgnostic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-05-07 10:11 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Rahm, James, and a few other Hillarians |
|
wanted to fire Dean BEFORE the election. Luckily, they failed.
|
movonne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-05-07 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. That is because Dean was going after progressives (I prefer liberals) |
|
and they went after the blue dogs...they are really repugs in disguise as dems..we have really be had..they still want him out and so does hillary..
|
meegbear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-05-07 10:12 AM
Response to Original message |
2. What did she say previously? |
|
Not James Carville, not Nosepicker Von Douchebag or anybody else.
What did SHE say previously?
|
Inspired
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-05-07 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Carvillle speaks for the Clintons. n/t |
wyldwolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-05-07 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
meegbear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-05-07 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. And you're basing this on ........... |
BleedingHeartPatriot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-05-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
9. That is a ridiculous declarative statement. You have nothing with which to back up that |
|
statement.
I'll will be happy to withdraw my post if, in fact, you can provide something which supports your theory.
Preferably, an on the record statement by a credible source.
MKJ
|
msongs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-05-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message |
4. another hillary smear with no cause/effect or relationship... |
|
what other people say and do has nothing to do with what she said. What is the term for this kind of twisted logic?
you could at least put up honest complaints, of which there may be many, instead of copying from the right winger playbook.
Msongs www.msongs.com/political-shirts.htm
|
flpoljunkie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-05-07 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. These are her own words yesterday, and Carville was and is her attack dog. |
BleedingHeartPatriot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-05-07 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
BleedingHeartPatriot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-05-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
11. There are plenty of psy ops going on here. Most ploys are transparent and |
|
Edited on Sun Aug-05-07 10:34 AM by BleedingHeartPatriot
some are more skilled.
But, you can count on one thing. If the subtle, or blatant, disruption isn't working, they will always go back to bashing Sen. Clinton.
Works like a charm.
MKJ
|
flpoljunkie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-05-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. Psy ops? Disruptive to what--Hillary's "coronation"? This is a political discussion board, and |
|
Edited on Sun Aug-05-07 11:40 AM by flpoljunkie
politics ain't beanbeag!
|
BleedingHeartPatriot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-05-07 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
15. LOL! Excellent response. It's not hard to understand why you might believe |
|
that was my intent.
It's the divide and conqueor, declarative statements about one Dem candidate or another which I was addressing.
I'm not thrilled with seeing Sen. Clinton splashed all over the morning, noon and nightly news, each day, and the other candidates get barely a flicker.
Except Sen. Obama, who was initially called a "rock star" :puke: by the corporomedia, he has now been presented to us as being attacked by Sen. Clinton for being naive.
No doubt, there are "operatives" from the campaigns reading this website and posting.
Along with all sorts of "neighbor watch" types, trying to create disagreement for whatever agendas. For which a fundemental understanding human psychology is helpful.
So, I was saying operatives, of whatever stripe, using psychology to disrupt the board.
I stand by that statement. :-)
MKJ
|
Adelante
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-05-07 10:39 AM
Response to Original message |
12. I accept her statement |
|
I was very glad to hear it.
|
SaveElmer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-05-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message |
14. Hmmm...lets see...by your logic then... |
|
Since Obama's mentor is slum lord...then that means Obama is a slum lord too right...?
|
killbotfactory
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-05-07 11:29 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Will Carville shut the hell up now? |
|
That guy is determined to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
|
NoodleBoy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-06-07 12:10 AM
Response to Original message |
17. Carville hasn't worked for the Clintons in how long? |
|
Not that it matters to some people.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:57 PM
Response to Original message |