Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary said at Yearlykos forum that Dean's 50-State strategy was "exactly the right thing to do"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 10:09 AM
Original message
Hillary said at Yearlykos forum that Dean's 50-State strategy was "exactly the right thing to do"
Now that's real interesting. Didn't her attack dog James Carville go after Dr. Dean for his 50-state strategy, even calling it "Rumsfeldian"--and, reportedly tried to get Dean replaced as DNC head with Harold Ford--now president of Al From's DLC?

A less than subtle attempt to rewrite history here for the Yearlykos attendees?

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/11/17/ap/politics/mainD8LF47580.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Rahm, James, and a few other Hillarians
wanted to fire Dean BEFORE the election. Luckily, they failed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. That is because Dean was going after progressives (I prefer liberals)
and they went after the blue dogs...they are really repugs in disguise as dems..we have really be had..they still want him out and so does hillary..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. What did she say previously?
Not James Carville, not Nosepicker Von Douchebag or anybody else.

What did SHE say previously?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inspired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Carvillle speaks for the Clintons. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. no he doesn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. And you're basing this on ...........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. That is a ridiculous declarative statement. You have nothing with which to back up that
statement.

I'll will be happy to withdraw my post if, in fact, you can provide something which supports your theory.

Preferably, an on the record statement by a credible source.

MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. another hillary smear with no cause/effect or relationship...
what other people say and do has nothing to do with what she said. What is the term for this kind of twisted logic?

you could at least put up honest complaints, of which there may be many, instead of copying from the right winger playbook.

Msongs
www.msongs.com/political-shirts.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. These are her own words yesterday, and Carville was and is her attack dog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Riiiiight.
MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. There are plenty of psy ops going on here. Most ploys are transparent and
Edited on Sun Aug-05-07 10:34 AM by BleedingHeartPatriot
some are more skilled.

But, you can count on one thing. If the subtle, or blatant, disruption isn't working, they will always go back to bashing Sen. Clinton.

Works like a charm.

MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Psy ops? Disruptive to what--Hillary's "coronation"? This is a political discussion board, and
Edited on Sun Aug-05-07 11:40 AM by flpoljunkie
politics ain't beanbeag!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. LOL! Excellent response. It's not hard to understand why you might believe
that was my intent.

It's the divide and conqueor, declarative statements about one Dem candidate or another which I was addressing.

I'm not thrilled with seeing Sen. Clinton splashed all over the morning, noon and nightly news, each day, and the other candidates get barely a flicker.

Except Sen. Obama, who was initially called a "rock star" :puke: by the corporomedia, he has now been presented to us as being attacked by Sen. Clinton for being naive.

No doubt, there are "operatives" from the campaigns reading this website and posting.

Along with all sorts of "neighbor watch" types, trying to create disagreement for whatever agendas. For which a fundemental understanding human psychology is helpful.

So, I was saying operatives, of whatever stripe, using psychology to disrupt the board.

I stand by that statement. :-)

MKJ

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
12. I accept her statement
I was very glad to hear it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
14. Hmmm...lets see...by your logic then...
Since Obama's mentor is slum lord...then that means Obama is a slum lord too right...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
16. Will Carville shut the hell up now?
That guy is determined to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
17. Carville hasn't worked for the Clintons in how long?
Not that it matters to some people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC