Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For those who think Chuckie Hagel is such a good guy...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 06:58 PM
Original message
For those who think Chuckie Hagel is such a good guy...
Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007 - Vote Passed (68-31, 1 Not Voting)

The Senate passed this bill that would add 3 million lower-income children to the State Children’s Health Insurance Program.

Sen. Chuck Hagel voted NO
Sen. Ben Nelson voted YES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't think there are many left.
He was pretty well outed as an ultraconservative when he was flirting with running a few months ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. LOL! I know this doesn't surprise you, does it?
I would have been surprised if he VOTED for it, frankly. He won't betray his cold-hearted conservative principles, not even for little kids, NOT EVEN when other Repubs supported/cosponsored it, like Chuck Grassley. He's nothing if not consistent when it comes to screwing the average Joe. The good thing is, it will bite him in the ass if he does decide to run for Prez. And Nelson gets a gold star for that vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peregrine Took Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. If I've said it once I've said it a thousand times, "Never trust a republican -
not one - ever!!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. As I understand it, Hagel is ultra-conservative except in his opposition to the war.
Is this right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Pretty much. Even his opposition to the war can be considered
consistent with conservatism--why keep wasting our troops and resources for diminishing returns? I hope the other R's start to see it that way. But yeah--he's a right-winger, though a sane/non-fundie one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 05:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yep!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. Thank you!
I was extremely pissed when he spoke at my son's college graduation. There were people on DU defending him. I could not believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Curious as to what he said that was so offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. The f*cker had the nerve to speak about ethics.
Imagine that.

This is the guy who did not admit until later that he owned the company that counted all his votes...electronically. This is the guy who was on the short list for vice-president on the Bush ticket the first time around.

A repuke...who rubber-stamps all the shit that they are doing - talking about ethics. He agrees with them about everything except the war, as I understand it. It seems he is a veteran, a rarity among that group of chickenhawks, who knows what war is.

I don't think it was appropriate to have a politician who, although unannounced, may be considering a run for the Presidency during this cycle. I would not have minded another office holder of either party, as long as he or she was not someone using this graduation as a possible photo op for higher office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Fair enough! I don't think candidates should give grad speeches either, but
it appears to be common practice now. I thought Obama gave a great one in the spring, but still...I have to agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
7. People think Hagel is a good guy?
Wow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
9. Forget about him. Hagel is a "Diebold Republican"
Edited on Wed Aug-08-07 05:28 AM by Perry Logan
Chuck Hagel doesn't belong in public office at all:

"The respected Washington, DC publication The Hill (www.thehill.com/news/012903/hagel.aspx) has confirmed that former conservative radio talk-show host and now Republican U.S. Senator Chuck Hagel was the head of, and continues to own part interest in, the company that owns the company that installed, programmed, and largely ran the voting machines that were used by most of the citizens of Nebraska.

Back when Hagel first ran there for the U.S. Senate in 1996, his company's computer-controlled voting machines showed he'd won stunning upsets in both the primaries and the general election. The Washington Post (1/13/1997) said Hagel's "Senate victory against an incumbent Democratic governor was the major Republican upset in the November election." According to Bev Harris of www.blackboxvoting.org, Hagel won virtually every demographic group, including many largely Black communities that had never before voted Republican. Hagel was the first Republican in 24 years to win a Senate seat in Nebraska.

Six years later Hagel ran again, this time against Democrat Charlie Matulka in 2002, and won in a landslide. As his hagel.senate.gov website says, Hagel "was re-elected to his second term in the United States Senate on November 5, 2002 with 83% of the vote. That represents the biggest political victory in the history of Nebraska."

What Hagel's website fails to disclose is that about 80 percent of those votes were counted by computer-controlled voting machines put in place by the company affiliated with Hagel. Built by that company. Programmed by that company.
http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0131-01.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 05:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes, that is so true. I've posted about that before, and so many people
seem to either want to ignore that fact, or think I'm full of shit.

The truth is the guy is republican. Through and through. Not what the propagandists call a fiscally responsible republican, but a money grubbing, vote stealing, lying, self-serving shit of the type that party spits out.

Being against the war isn't that big a deal. It just proves that one is capable of logical thought and has tracable brainwave patterns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. As far as I'm concerned, America is in a state of civil war. The left and right are going to fight.
Edited on Wed Aug-08-07 06:04 AM by Perry Logan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Well, I disagree with you there. He's one of the few Repubs I respect.
I disagree with his votes (like on SCHIP) and his ultra-conservatism, but I expect him to vote the way he does--he's a product of, and represents, both Nebraska and his party. I think he has integrity, and as a military wife, I appreciate that he served his country (no chickenhawk, he) and ALWAYS stands up for fellow vets--sorry, can't join in on the Chuckie hate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. That's fine. Yeah, he served. So did millions of others. And they
all didn't turn out to be corporate shits. Whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yep, he is as pro-big-business as they come.
There's no question about that. He will always side with their interests. (There are many Democrats, though, who do the same thing, just not as obviously or as consistently.) But that's the conservative Republican religion. It's like getting angry at a wolf for being a predator and eating bunnies--that's just the nature of the beast. That doesn't mean that I can't appreciate the wolf who occasionally goes against the pack to do the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. See, I can't appreciate someone just because they served if
they are elitist, corporatist, and a liar. And if they won their first election by votes counted on machines produced by a company of which they are a part-owner. Especially when he'd never won anything else before.

Nope, military service don't cut it. He's not a chickenhawk. But he is a chickenshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I can understand if you don't like him, certainly. I respect him, but
he often aggravates me. It just all comes down to what you're willing to believe about certain people. I don't believe he rigged his elections--aside from the fact that there's no evidence, nor any credible current allegation or investigation against him, there's just nothing about his character that suggests he would commit this sort of serious crime. Hell, two of our Prez candidates made him their official favorite Republican on national TV, and I would think Biden and Edwards wouldn't say that if they thought he was a corrupt Stevens-like scandal waiting to happen. But a guy who volunteered for combat, and still has shrapnel in his chest from it, is not someone I'd call a chickenshit--an asshole, maybe, but chickenshit, no. Voting against expanding kids' healthcare--assholiness. On that we can agree. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
18. GOP using this bill to hit Dems .
It has been on every news channel --Some Republicans used
it to slam Dem. Party at the Iowa Rep. Debates this weekend.

I respect Hagel. He has excellent forein policy ideals and
ideas.

On Domestic issues he is arch conservative. I thought everyone
new this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. I find it hard to believe that they are using this bill against us--
I would think it's the other way around. Who wants to be AGAINST health care for kids? But that's how craven they are. And I agree, Hagel is a highly trusted and respected voice on foreign policy--he is going to leave a big hole in the Foreign Relations Committee when he's out of the Senate next year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democratsin08 Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
19. he is a rep
whats good about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC