Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TPM Cafe: Hillary's Secret Weapon - She Makes Republicans Lose It!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 01:39 PM
Original message
TPM Cafe: Hillary's Secret Weapon - She Makes Republicans Lose It!
It was November 1966. Richard Nixon was struggling to do the near impossible: achieve a second Presidential nomination after losing to JFK and then to Pat Brown for Governor of California.

Nixon was not given much of a chance. He was a "loser" and the most polarizing figure in American politics.

But Nixon assembled a staff, campaigned across the country and tried to make his nomination in 1968 seem inevitable.

And then suddenly, the unpopular President from Texas, LBJ, did Nixon a huge favor. After Nixon criticized Johnson's war strategy, Johnson, during a televised press conference, lost it.

He blasted Nixon, calling him a "chronic campaigner, whose only concern was picking up a few votes.

The Nixon camp could not believe their luck. They had succeeded in getting under LBJ's skin. By responding to Nixon's attack as he did, LBJ elevated Nixon to the Presidential level, right where Nixon needed to be. He was, of course, elected in 1968.

Now Hillary Clinton is no Nixon, thank God.

But the Bush/Rove White House today did the same favor for her that LBJ did for Tricky Dick.

Team Hillary this week started sticking it to Bush and Rove with the sole intention of getting under their skin and provoking an attack that would make her seem like the anti-Bush, the Democratic standard bearer, the inevitable nominee.

They succeeded. And although Hillary still has a tough road ahead of her in achieving the nomination, let alone the White House, this week's episode demonstrates that there is an upside to Hillary's polarizing history.

She drives Republicans nuts.

She causes them to lose their sh*t.

And, when they attack her as they did this week, she causes pretty much all Democrats to want to rally behind her. I think that is because, although not all of us are Hillary fans, we know that the Republicans despise her because she's an "uppity woman", a liberal, a "sixties" person, a symbol of the diversity that is the Democratic party.

It's like what the Democrats used to say about Grover Cleveland (I'm old), "We love him because we hate his enemies."

And that is why, despite her negatives, Hillary would win against the Republicans. Their hatred of her will galvanize support among Democrats and independents (especially women).

Yes, she has high negatives. But watch THEM drive her negatives down. Being the #1 target of the most despised administration in history (and of their strident right-wing acolytes) is the one asset no one can take away from Hillary.

They will never hate anyone as much as they hate her. The irony is that their hatred will, if she is nominated, elect her.

Nice.

http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/coffeehouse/2007/aug/14/hillarys_secret_weapon_she_makes_republicans_lose_it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ken Blackwell, Wm. Kristol,
Rupert Murdoch, Bush Rangers all love her.

I wonder who she drives crazy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. so you're position is she would NOT rally the GOP base?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. She might,
but it will be offset by the Democratic base she alienates.

Either way, alienation of any segment is not a reason to support a candidate. The enemy of my enemy is not my friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. the monkey wrench in all that is...
...there is no evidence of either.

Sorry.

The left has been threatening to "sit out" elections since 1968.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I didn't vote in '68
and I haven't been happy with many of my choices since I could first vote in a Presidential election, but I've always held my nose and voted D regardless, but if Hillary is the nominee I refuse to vote for the Democrat. Maybe David Brooks' endorsement will help her pick up Republicans to make up for people like me, but I don't care. This nomination will push me to the limit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I've heard it over and over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. If she's elected
you'll be proved right. If she wins I suspect it would be with Republican cross-over, which is why she bows to them. The reason she doesn't care about the Democratic base is she has calculated that she doesn't need them. She may very well be right about that.

If she governs, I'll be shown to be right about what she is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. "democratic base"
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. The Democratic Party is not
a religion to me. It is what is does.

My vote is not faith based. Maybe the rank and file will vote Hillary regardless of what she is, I doubt it, and I doubt she cares.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. but... "democratic base?"
:shrug:

When Democrats are polled, and 40% say they're voting for Clinton, who are they if not rank and file dems?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. Those who contribute,
volunteer, participate and follow the issues and candidates. Definitely not the group who choses their candidate based on name recognition.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. I have chosen not to
make personal attacks directed at you.

Your decision to use personal insults is all one needs to know about the substance of your argument.

Our conversation is over, the last word will be yours.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. spotbird, you've fallen for the "progressive" redefining of "base."
Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. You're confusing respect for support. They respect BillC....
and she benefits from that some.

But they do hate her. Trust me on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Why do they hate her?
Edited on Fri Aug-17-07 01:49 PM by aquart
On edit: and who, exactly, is "they"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bizarre.
THEY will not drive down her negatives among those who are THEM. This is being made out by the media to be so much more than it is - a relatively mild slap at the administration by her, provoking a relatively mild response by Rove as he is leaving office.

Other candidates have been far harsher, and been responded to much more severely and the media ignored it.

It's all about the campaign to make Hillary "inevitable".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. "Other candidates have been far harsher, and been responded to much more severely" Who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. How many in the current crop of candidates have been accused of murder...?
By the right wing sleaze machine...eagerly repeated in the MSM...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Ancient history and "she "personally" was not accused of murder
but her husbands admin was implicated bu a few " RW wackos" no one gave credence to. Bush has been accused of even more .This is filed under BFD.She has not been as savaged as either Obama and Edwards in this cycle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Vince Foster...
The ridiculous conspiracy theory that she was responsible for his death because they had an affair was splashed all over...

Edwards I'll grant you has not had an easy time, and he doesn't deal with it well. Obama has been largely fawned over...with Hillary getting plenty of negative coverage...only now turning around because the media cannot plausibly deny the effectiveness of her campaign...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. She was not accused in Vince Foster's death.As I said it was implied the WH was involved
It was splashed all over mostly tabloids and talk radio. and most American's didn't buy it. Obama has NOT just been fawned over.He was accused of being a terrorist and his name has been made much of.He has also been accused of lying.Edwards has handled his attacks every bit as well as Hillary ever has. He has diplayed true grace under pressur.He takes this crap while running a campaign with a wife who is gravely ill.Hillary only had a cheating husband.And Hillary has gotten NO negative coverage this cycle.Even Hannitty and Fox News suck up to her.Rupert Murdoch is supporting her for gods sake.What reality are some living in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. Well Laura * just happen to run a stop sign and just happen to T-bone her ex boyfriend. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm not a big fan of her statements on the war
I'm not enamored of her campaign style either.

But one thing I love about her.

Every idiot wing nut I know (and I know a lot of them) goes absolutely fuckin bat shit crazy at the mention of her name. They are conditioned by years of listening to pig boy limpballs on the radio to believe she is the earthly incarnation of satan. Most of these idiots don't know jack shit about her enabling of the Iraq war or her refusal to condemn the Libby pardon.

And very few of them even bother to vote - just bitch.

You might call it reverse motivation. I will vote for her just to make these cretins foam at the mouth and drool for the next four years.

And I believe there are more of me than there are of them - nation wide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. My RW neighbor (an older, retired professional) admires HRC for
her brains, her "sticktoitiveness" (her word, not mine). "It's damn time we got a woman in the WH, men have been screwing things up for years." Again, her words, my thoughts exactly. I would add this woman allowed her husband to handle the finances, stock market purchases, etc. He's now dead and she's pretty much broke. She says she will vote for the first time in 60 years as a Dem and prays it will be HRC. She has many friends and still socializes, says she is not alone in her thinking. I'm liking that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
16. So we get to watch the same bad movie over and over again?
Yippee.

Only a country in an awful rut would opt for this sort of re-run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. What bad movie. The Clintons always Won even in the worst of times..
It's a rut we'd love to have the Republican's in...because it's a Loser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
19. I dont want to encourage the "Let's sit back and let Republicans fall on their own sword" routine.
I hope that it is right this time (it never has been before)- that the Republicans at heart are just a bunch of unfocused, red-faced screamers who's negative attacks will turn voters against them.

I'd love to believe it is true, but I've never seen it work that way...

I'll agree that Hillary can fight these people if they blow their cool or take the smears too far, I just hope we are not expecting the "sit back and let them self destruct" thing to work as well as it did in 2006.

I hope the 2006 model holds true from now on- I hope the GOP election machine bumbles,fumbles and makes mistakes like we are always told they will end up doing.

Just my general opinion- If she wins the nod, I hope the article proves true.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
21. Hillary rocks
I would gladly volunteer/vote for her (or any of the dem front runners!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
22. Oh great- lets keep this country divided. It's so much fun
with Repubs and Dems hating each other.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
26. republicans are praying all the time for her to be our nominee. the are so hoping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Are you in on those prayer meetings or do you just have faith? Because...
....there is simply no real evidence to support your claim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. They are underestimating her again if they think they can beat her.
She's made of tough stuff. I don't think the Reps running could beat Hillary. Rudy is the one that is fatally flawed. Mittens is too creepy, too plastic even for Republican voters.

No matter who gets the Dem nod, we will have to work our fingers to the bone. We have to win beyond the margin of error.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
30. Ladies and Gentlemen of this
Forum, we have a fighter in HRC. She has already stated, " If your opponent attacks you, deck em." When she wins the nomination we will not have to worry whether are not she will fight if the republican attacks her. You can rest assured there will be a response like there was in 1992 when the War Room went after any republican that said anything negative about Bill Clinton. HRC is more then just the average bear in the woods. She is a damn grizzley....
One other thing when she wins the nomination the democratic convention will not be like the one in 04 where no one could say anything negative. You can rest assured this will be a great convention and when she finishes her acceptance speech and tells the country in what she believes and in what direction she will take the country her lead over the republican will increase to double digits...

I do thank you
Ben David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v4.0
==================



This week is our third quarter 2007 fund drive. Democratic
Underground is a completely independent website. We depend on donations
from our members to cover our costs. Thank you so much for your support.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EndElectoral Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
36. You' right on one thing. She drives Repubs nuts, and they will turn out in d-roves to defeat her.
Edited on Sat Aug-18-07 12:38 PM by EndElectoral
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC