Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rosemary Palmer on the Environment...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 05:36 PM
Original message
Rosemary Palmer on the Environment...
Edited on Sat Aug-18-07 05:38 PM by SaveElmer
She is ramping up quickly...good job giving a high level view of where she thinks we should be headed...look forward to her fleshing out the details...and it's clear she intends on being an active participant on this issue...



On May 25, 1961, President Kennedy called on Americans to land on the moon within that decade. We accomplished that task about eight years later.

America has a new challenge: To find and market alternative forms of energy.

By doing that, we can clean the environment, reduce our dependence on foreign oil, and rejuvenate industry and create jobs.

The current administration has wasted precious time by denying that global warming is a problem. The facts are clear: polar ice is melting, water levels are rising, and weather patterns have changed while our consumption of oil products continues unabated.

At the same time, Americans complain.

We complain about the high cost of gas.

We complain about our dependence on foreign oil.

We complain about the decline of our central cities and urban sprawl while we make longer and longer daily commutes to our homes farther and farther out.

We complain about loss of jobs and young people’s lack of preparation in the math and science needed for new, technological jobs.

When elected to congress, I will push for a national program to perfect and market alternative energy sources to halt global warming and reduce dependence on foreign oil.

This program would involve industry, labor, and all levels of government acting cooperatively to meet this major new challenge. Such a comprehensive program would cover fuel efficiency and alternative fuels for our cars and trucks, and alternative heating and cooling energy sources for our homes and offices.


...

Governments at all levels can lead the way toward going green. Fuel-efficient light bulbs, sensors that turn on and then off when people enter or leave a room, and municipal recycling programs are just some of the ways we can protect the environment.

The national program I support would have four major results that would help to keep America strong and retain its leadership in the world.

First, alternative fuels would insulate us from the need to import oil. This would have a major impact on our foreign policy toward the Middle East. This would allow wise leadership to focus on issues such as poverty and health care that lead desperate people to jihad.

Second, the program’s emphasis on cooperation between industry, labor and government would help rejuvenate American industries, including auto, glass, electronics, and metal fabricating.

Third, if tied to education at the primary and secondary levels, as well as higher education, the program would serve a new generation of students with higher proficiency in math and science, ready for jobs of the future.

And fourth, of course, we would greatly reduce carbon emissions that cause global warming and otherwise damage our environment.

Environmental protection is an opportunity, not a burden. As our region seeks to develop existing and new industries, research and innovation offer our economy a real opportunity to compete with other areas of the country as well as an ability to compete globally.

Congress has taken some steps in the right direction on this topic this year. On Saturday, August 4th, the House passed “The New Direction for Energy Independence, National Security, and Consumer Protection Act.” This legislation encompasses the work of several Congressional Committees this year and reflects a new perspective for environmental policy-making in the near future. It calls for the development of alternative energies, worker training in new technologies, International emissions reduction, increased funding for cutting-edge research and encourages energy efficiency in both the public and private sectors, among many other provisions.

I believe Northeast Ohio can be a leader in this effort given our abundance of academic institutions and our history of technological innovation. What it will take, however, is the political will and commitment to stick to policies that protect the environment while, at the same time, offering an economic opportunity.

We need the political leadership to guide the way. Leadership is the daily work of committed elected officials working toward the goals of environmental stewardship and economic development as complementary principles and ideals.

Congressman Kucinich failed to show up to vote when this bill was on the House floor. The 10th Congressional District of Ohio can no longer afford to have an empty desk representing us in Washington, DC.

We need thoughtful and provoking leadership. We need someone to be at the negotiating table when important decisions are made. I will be that Congresswoman, and I will be committed to these important environmental issues as well as every other issue that matters to Northeast Ohioans, everyday.

http://www.rosemarypalmerforcongress.com/index.php?page=display&id=12

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Despite her platform
I can't help thinking that she will enjoy immense support from Bob Ney democrats throughout Ohio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
penguin7 Donating Member (962 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. This woman seriously needs her head examined.
She is running against Kucinich because she feels he has not done enough to get us out of Iraq. That is just plain crazy.

And Kucinich had food poisoning two or three weeks ago. If that is the day she is talking him missing a vote that is just plain dishonest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TSIAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Just to be fair
He had food poisoning in mid-July. It doesn't appear this happened on the same day.

Nevertheless, the bill passed 241-172 with 20 no votes. Damn! They really needed DK to get that passed :sarcasm: I hate it when candidates pull this crap. It's not like Dennis is out there on vacation. He's campaigning for president trying to show that there is a real left wing alive in this country.

Why not go after Allen Boyd and the other Blue Dogs who actually voted against this piece of legislation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yep. Crazy. And suspicious. Sudden anti-DK movement?
From "within?"

Why tear down Dennis? Why attack him?


Surely there are two sides to that vote he allegedly missed. Where is the balance? Where is DK's side of the story?

To me that's telling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TSIAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Here's a total list of missed votes
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/110/house/vote-missers/

I'll give Charlie Norwood and Juanita McDonald a pass, since both of them died during the 110th Congress.

I looked to see if any Blue Dogs had a worse attendance record than DK. So far I came up with Nick Lampson and Jim Marshall.

Looks like he's doing pretty well, since GOP'rs Duncan Hunter and Tom Tancredo are pushing 30 %.

Overall, this is a pretty silly argument. I'm positive that if his support in needed for a vital measure to pass/fail, he'd be there. Other than that, this type of talk is purely political and means nothing. I remember when the right-wing smear machine, headed by Charlie Crist, pulled this line of attack on Democrat Jim Davis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC