Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton the original "new kind of politics" president?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 10:38 PM
Original message
Clinton the original "new kind of politics" president?
Here is what a prominent author, whose book has sold a million copies, had to say about Clinton's DLC Third Way:

==It was Bill Clinton's singular contribution that he recognized that the categories of conservative and liberal played to Republican advantage and were inadequate to address our problems.

He understood the falseness of the choices being presented to Americans. He saw that government spending and regulation could serve as vital ingredients and not inhibitors to growth, and how markets and fiscal responsibility could help promote social justice. He recognized that societal and personal responsibility were needed to combat poverty. Clinton's third way went beyond splitting the difference. It tapped into the pragmatic, nonideological attitude of Americans.

By the end of his presidency, his policies enjoyed broad support. That he failed, despite a booming economy, to translate popular policies into a governing coalition said something about the demographic difficulties Democrats were facing and the structural advantages Republicans enjoyed in the Senate.==

Do you agree or disagree with this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. bill clinton's legacy "failed" because of corrupt vote counting in Florida nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. It was 8 great fucking years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Electing Hillary will not bring that back....
the reason it was "8 great fucking years" is because the Clinton presidency represented a definite change in Washington. Electing Hillary will just add to the problem that is now entrenched.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I disagree with you 100 %. She is what I want
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. For what reasons?
What does she offer that inspires you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. If I believed you cared, I would answer. You blew it ...sorry, on my Loathe List
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. I'll take it that your answer is "I don't know"
xxx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. Just as you, predictably, avoid any attempt at intelligent discussion
and instead resort to childish insults and baiting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. So I have no patience with low IQ inmates. It is my downfall after all these years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. I'd guess you'd rather be obtuse and post cute little smilies
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. You guess? woop de doo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
28. Obama is not the only one who offers people "hope"
Edited on Fri Aug-24-07 12:01 AM by draft_mario_cuomo
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. I never said he was...
....in fact, I think there are many candidates who offer a ton of hope and inspiration. I just laugh at the idea that electing Hillary will bring back the glory days of the 90's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. So do I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
21.  ...
:loveya: :yourock: :applause: :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. No
The Clintons understood that if they moved very, very close to Republican policies, they could co-opt voters in the middle, and the traditional Dems wouldn't dare vote for non-Dem voters. So they won elections (and we lost both houses of Congress - yahoo!) The problem is that the Republicans pulled further to the Right to differentiate themselves, and all of the sudden we were knee-deep in all sorts of crazy stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Or perhaps he was practicing a "new kind of politics" like the author in the OP thinks?
It depends on how you look at it. We know he split the difference between progressives and conservatives--the question is why. Is the author correct or is your common view correct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Let's Look At The His Points
"He saw that government spending and regulation could serve as vital ingredients and not inhibitors to growth" - He actually decreased government spending and regulation, just as traditional Republicans do. He slashed barriers to free trade - that may have increased the growth of bank accounts for the rich, but it screwed the rest of us.

"and how markets and fiscal responsibility could help promote social justice." - A traditional Republican meme. And it follows that, under Clinton, the gap grew between the rich and everyone else.

"He recognized that societal and personal responsibility were needed to combat poverty." - again, a traditional Republican meme.

I suppose that if you define pragmatic=Republican, the shoe fits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. Take a guess who the author was nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alteredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. I think I've already posted the answer. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #22
35. Well Done
Assuming that the autor was Mr. Obama, that was a good swipe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alteredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. So........ did you just pick up "The Audacity of Hope"? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Did you?
Hope is the dumbest reason to elect someone.
One might as well blow out candles
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. No I don't agree. He was essentially an opportunist and self serving at heart and weak
Edited on Thu Aug-23-07 11:05 PM by illinoisprogressive
If people would look at his presidency in the real eye of today instead of gauzy thinking they would see that Clinton was a weak man. And he was an opportunist who was mostly about himself.
the Clintons embody that selfish thinking of "It is only about me, me me."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. So why kind of approach would you like to see that differs from the author's/Clinton approach? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. Who do you think wrote the things in the OP? Al From? Rahm? Holy Joe? nt
Edited on Thu Aug-23-07 11:50 PM by draft_mario_cuomo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 05:55 AM
Response to Reply #24
33. Interesting.........(still ) no answer to your question.
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alteredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 05:58 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. I answered it n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. Great forensic talking point question dmc...
Funny though- Obama supporters tend to disagree with the author's analytical view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Well, Tell, concidering your candidate is the most corrupt, I can see where you'd be jealous
You cannot point to anything like a real stand on the issues or any vision or anything other than just the same old selfish Clinton way of thinking only about themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Ah, sour grapes coming from you because 'Obama Girl' is voting for Hillary..
"I have to say I'm very impressed with Hillary Clinton,"she tells Steppin' Out magazine's Chaunce Hayden."
"I watched the recent debates and I liked a lot of her answers!"

http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/r_m/2007/08/23/2007-08-23_obama_girl_has_hil_thrill.html?ref=rss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. Wow ....so much crap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
32. is this the same author who wrote...
... the free market system is a good thing and who believes competition is vital? who rejects special interest, or single issue, politics based on race, gender, sexual orientation, or victimhood? who recognizes the global war on terrorism is real, and not a "bumpersticker slogan?" Who would not be hesitant to use military force against terrorists if the situation warrants it? Who is not influenced by the conspiracy theories of certain corners of the party? Who Doesn't believe the US government has been hijacked by an evil cabal or other such nonsense? Who believes that both societal responsibility AND personal responsibility is key for combating society's ills? Who realizes that not every New Deal or Great Society program, like welfare, has worked as advertised and is open to reforming them?

This sounds like a DLC whore! WHO IS IT???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Yes it is. Who could it be? Did Al From ghostwrite his book? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC