Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill O'Reilly vs Jeremy Glick, Feb. 4, 2003 RE: Brzezinski

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 05:33 PM
Original message
Bill O'Reilly vs Jeremy Glick, Feb. 4, 2003 RE: Brzezinski
Edited on Fri Aug-24-07 05:37 PM by wyldwolf
I remember it will. Mr. Glick's father died in the World Trade Center on 9/11 and he appeared on the Bill O'Reilly show in the most shameful interview I'd ever seen.

As Glick debated O'Reilly on American culpability for 9/11, O'Reilly grew more and more hostile, telling him to SHUT UP... SHUT UP.

O'REILLY: See, I'm more angry about it than you are!

GLICK: So what about George Bush?

O'REILLY: What about George Bush? He had nothing to do with it.

GLICK: The director -- senior as director of the CIA.

O'REILLY: He had nothing to do with it.

GLICK: So the people that trained a hundred thousand Mujahadeen who were...

O'REILLY: Man, I hope your mom isn't watching this.

GLICK: Well, I hope she is.

O'REILLY: I hope your mother is not watching this because you -- that's it. I'm not going to say anymore.

GLICK: OK.

O'REILLY: In respect for your father...

GLICK: On September 14, do you want to know what I'm doing?

O'REILLY: Shut up. Shut up.


On DU, other Democratic message forums, blogs, and various other stops on the progressive blogosphere the video and transcript was talked about for days. People condemned O'Reilly for his behavior and the American government for arming and training the Mujahadeen - that eventually became Al Queda - who eventually killed 2000 Americans on 9/11.

Many put that squarely at the feet of the Reagan Bush administration. But that isn't where all the blame should go:

Q: The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs <"From the Shadows">, that American intelligence services began to aid the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan 6 months before the Soviet intervention. In this period you were the national security adviser to President Carter. You therefore played a role in this affair. Is that correct?

Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.

http://www.proxsa.org/resources/9-11/Brzezinski-980115-interview.htm


Today, Zbigniew Brzezinski expresed great admiration for Barack Obama's foreign policy judgement. Some on DU are applauding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. There are things I said and did 28 years ago
that I've since learned were wrong. I don't know how old you are, but it could be there will come a day that you'll discover some of your previous views and decisions were wrong.
Then comes the BIG challenge...will you admit them and change your ways ??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. has Brzezinski recanted? Should we forgive Reagan and Bush, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. at long last, oh shill oh scoundrel.... have you no shame?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. more of tha "progressive" attacking we're used to. Refute much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. have fun dissing liberals on a liberal board....
sweating under your Chewbacca suit much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. He does this quite regularly.
He attacks liberals and progressives and purposely posts things to point the blame on Democrats (as he has here). Then when they get mad, which when you are insulted and blamed for things you had nothing to do with you inevitably do, he mocks the entire progressive movement.

Frankly, I don't know how the guy has survived this long with the amount of flamewars he has started just to get a rise out of the large majority of this board that consider themselves, "progressives" or "liberals".

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. underoos too tight ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. wyld, you are very cool, but your attacks are very pathetic.
Edited on Fri Aug-24-07 05:56 PM by Katzenkavalier
You need to bring your game up a notch. This is not effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. Smearing Zbig? You're having a bad day
Edited on Fri Aug-24-07 05:59 PM by BeyondGeography
Got your butt kicked on the last anti-Zbig thread so you start this one.

For those with an open mind on the issue, who can forget Brzezinski running circles around Richard Perle and the neo-cons on Newshour and other venues prior to the war? He was one of the few voices of sanity is a very dark time. And, oh, by the way, he was right about the impending collapse of the Soviet Union before any of the Cold War-crazed Reaganites would admit it.

Training the Mujahadeen was the appropriate step at the time; failure to do so would have invited the soft-on-Communism meme that plagued Democrats in the post-Vietnam era. Not Zbig's fault that the problem of Bin Laden was allowed to fester as it did for decades after he was out of power.

You're way out of line on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. Wyldwolf, this is getting a little sad. You're becoming what you've always railed against.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC