Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Two General Election Maps with Hillary beating both Giuliani and Romney

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 09:02 AM
Original message
Two General Election Maps with Hillary beating both Giuliani and Romney
http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=938

Clinton 335 Giuliani 203



Clinton 430 Romney 108


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. In the fictional world of Saint Hillary, she can beat Mother Theresa.
Edited on Sat Aug-25-07 09:17 AM by IndianaGreen
In the real world, Hillary can't even summon a majority of Democratic voters. Her tenuous plurality won't hold as other candidates drop out and the anti-Hillary forces rally around one candidate to knock her off her throne.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. If she supposedly can't even get a majority of Democratic voters, then why is she doing so well
in the polls againt the other Dems who are running?

Sounds ike YOU'RE the one living in a fictional world. Hillary's lead against her Democratic opponents keeps expanding...yet you claim she can't get a plurality of Dem voters on her side.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Prior to the Gulf War, the Pentagon ran war simulations in which Iraq won
They were simulations, and Iraq's "forces" were led by Americans.

The Gulf War was a decisive defeat for Iraq, and it liberated Kuwait.

The fact is that not a single vote has been cast, and that in all the many polls that have been run, Hillary has yet to reach a majority of all Democratic voters (51% for you). Hillary only has a plurality which is mostly based on the Clinton name and nostalgia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Hillary
I don't support her for the nomination but I have to cede I was apparently wrong on her Electabilty.Against Guiliana she Is only losing one Blue state she stands to take the 2 Gore States
Kerry Lost(Iowa and New Mexico) but stands to win Ohio,Florida,Arkansas,West Virginia,Virginia,and
Kentucky(Bill CLinton never won Virginia) possibly take my home state of Missouri,and If Romney Is
the nominee(which could happen Romney could win Iowa and New Hampshire) could carry Alambama.Even If
Republicans succede with the vote spliting In California this may not help them keep the white house.A lot of voters want to return the country to before Bush,and Bush and the war In Iraq Is a
neuse around the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. hey, IndianaGreen, I realize real world politics is lost on you, so I'll explain it briefly
Political parties have primaries where a number of candidates vie to win their party's nomination. Each of these candidates have, traditionally, had their share of supporters.

The candidate with the MOST support (at this point Hillary Clinton) usually goes on to win the primaries.

Polling has indicated that Hillary Clinton is the overwhelming SECOND choice of Democratic voters. That means as other candidates drop out, Clinton gets the lion's share of their support.

And one more thing...

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Clinton and Edwards flip red states; Obama doesn't
Speaking of fictional worlds...(I am not talking about you, a DK supporter, here btw). Many say we should nominate someone who flips zero red states over people who do flip red states because he is magically more electable because if we win most of the Kerry states from 2004, lose the key swing states of Pennsylvania, Michigan, Ohio, and Florida as well as California, New York, and even Massachusetts (to Ghouliani) we will win. Have "hope"! :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. Hillary can't win Mississippi!
Even if Osama bin Laden was running against her and Jesus was her VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. mississippi?
President Clinton lost Mississippi to both Bush One and Dole and STILL was a two-term President. I don't think Osama or Jesus was involved in either race, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I'm just saying the map is flawed
Edited on Sat Aug-25-07 09:47 AM by TheFarseer
If it has Hillary winning MS, you wonder what else it's being overly-optimistic about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. against romney
i think you'll be surprised at the level of her support in the deep south Hillary will have. Mormons are concerned a cult, kind of like David Koresh and the branch dividians in the deep south. A lot of born-again christian types will simply be disgusted with their choices and stay home and if obama is on the ticket with her the black vote will just go up like crazy. It is certainly plausible for Hillary to win Mississippi if Romney is the candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Then I'll be cheering for Romney
to see how this theory works out in practice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobalt1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. Until they actually start campaigning against the republicans,
any projection is just a guess.

Right now, both sides are campaigning internally. How the final Republican and Democratic nominees do against each other is, at this stage, just a wild guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. The GOP doesn't have a candidate that can win.
None of the GOP candidates will rally the base enough to bring out the numbers needed to win. And voting "against" the other side's candidate is not a winning formula, either. The GOP is screwed.

Romney: New England background, way too slick, flip flopper on big issues, Mormon
Giuliani: Big city East Coast Mayor, liberal on guns gays and abortion. Wants to expand the war in the Mid East. Cross-dresser (!!!) Adulterer.
Thompson: Empty suit. Career lobbyist. Hollywood actor, philanderer. Lazy, disorganized. Losing the nomination while he stalls. Looks ill in photos. Old.

It doesn't matter who the Democrats run, the GOP cannot unite the Crazy Christian Fundamentalist and traditional cloth-coat factions of their party, the way Bush did in 2000 and 2004. That alliance has been damaged.

Hillary Clinton can definitely win, without a doubt:
-The Democratic base is still way more energized than the Republican base.
-Bush will still be in office in November 08, and US forces will still be in Iraq without a clear mission
-She's not nearly as "unlikable" as the pundits claim
- Quote: "Hillary only has a plurality which is mostly based on the Clinton name and nostalgia." (since when is "name and nostalgia" a negative for electability???)

Bill Clinton was twice as popular as Bush is now, even during the Monica scandal. A lot of that good will is going to carry over.

I'm not sure who I'll vote for in the primary. But all the leading candidates on the Dem side have a shot at winning, and even a couple of the second tier Dems could win IMO (Richardson and Dodd could also win in 08)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC